Jump to content

IMF takes aim at Yingluck’s rice-pledging scheme


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

There is no way that the thieving convicted criminal caddy will make any meaningful humanitarian gesture to the PI, as there are no votes to be won in for that, but there is plenty of money to be made by selling above market prices, which is a win win for him and his Paid for cronies.

Thainess in action.

Edited by mrtoad
Posted

Or caddie.

I am just a [*%#)&^!_-&^*|:"><] clone.

IMF said “with the pledging prices about 40% above market prices, it is inevitable for the government to incur losses as long as the scheme remains unchanged.”

Well a half wit knows that. But she has backers who aren't smart enough. She thinks she has the whole world fooled by selling it Government to Government with out giving out the prices.

the fact that the IMF, Moody's, Blumeburg. The economists and Forbes have educated people working for them that specialize in economics and can read her like an open book just doesn't register with the clones.

She is as good at economics as I am at spelling. My spell check couldn't even figure Blumeberg or Bloomberg out. Well maybe it did.. How would I know. I just know that they do not have high expectations out of the current bunch in the seat of power,

  • Like 2
Posted

The rice pledging scheme was simply a ploy to buy and maintain voter stability are pass rewards to a selected few and all at the public's expense. It has the small of big brother all over it.

  • Like 2
Posted

So it helps to clear the farmer's debts by making them into the country's debts that generations to come will have to struggle to pay back. Let then damn farmers pay off their own damn debts and stop wasting money on this daft populist scheme that is aimed purely at securing election votes.....

Posted

Protestors on every street corner....And now the IMF ..she's not having a very good week is she?w00t.gif

There can be only one solution for Ying(bad)luck.............SHOPPING!!!!!!!

Posted

IMF no understan thainess

rice scam & flood scam = money for corrupt people to buy big mansions, mercedes, mia nois, etc...........

The three M's that all Thai men hope to achieve

Posted (edited)

I just posted this elsewhere, but on reflection I think it makes more sense here. Apologies for double posting:

With reference to the rice buying scheme, let's not forget Thaksin's justification that: 'the government led by his sister Yingluck should continue the rice subsidy scheme for two or three years... Thaksin also urged the government to increase rice stocks by 20 million to 40 million tonnes over the next few years, as the global price would go up due to the possibility of some kind of natural disaster'.

Well, now we have a natural disaster with an estimated 11 million people in the Philippines ravaged by a super typhoon, millions without food and water, an estimated half of Leyte's rice crop wiped out. Yet to date the Thai government has made no suggestion that some surplus rice might be transferred FREE to their Filipino ASEAN brothers...

Instead it seems a most opportune time for this grasping, despotic, small-minded man to offer to sell the surplus rice crop at above market values - maybe the Americans or the EU will pay the cost? After all, that is what he explicitly suggested in his justification for the rice buying scheme. Buy with Thai tax payers money, wait for natural disaster, reap a high return by profiteering at the expense of those suffering from a natural disaster, and to hell with morality and common humanity.

Step up, Thaksin, show your mettle! The world will surely be impressed.

But seriously, let's hope the more high-minded and generous nature of the great majority of Thai people of all political colours will shine through and eclipse the evil, self-centred nature of one man.

Now is surely the time for Thailand to make a substantial gesture towards the Philippines. It would win considerable international kudos... and if they don't the rice will rot anyway.

In terms of agricultural mismanagement Thaksin's rice policy is beginning to resemble that of another Chinese demagogue and his Great Leap Forward. sad.png

Edited by bigbamboo
Posted
Commerce Minister Niwatthamlong Boonsongpaisarn reiterated today that the government’s rice pledging scheme helped to increase farmers’ earnings and clear their debts

If that was true, I would think that public debt would decline instead of rise to previous unknow levels

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/675653-thailand-august-public-debts-at-4463-of-gdp/

BANGKOK, Oct 19 – Thailand’s public debt in August was Bt5.3 trillion, or 44.63 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), according to a senior Finance Ministry official report.

Previously unknown?

Public-debt_tcm2590-385779.jpg

Posted
Commerce Minister Niwatthamlong Boonsongpaisarn reiterated today that the government’s rice pledging scheme helped to increase farmers’ earnings and clear their debts

If that was true, I would think that public debt would decline instead of rise to previous unknow levels

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/675653-thailand-august-public-debts-at-4463-of-gdp/

BANGKOK, Oct 19 – Thailand’s public debt in August was Bt5.3 trillion, or 44.63 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), according to a senior Finance Ministry official report.

Previously unknown?

Public-debt_tcm2590-385779.jpg

Do you have a graph for private debt, which would be much more logical in his statement?

Posted

I see that Special K has said that Thailand is a special case and should continue as it is.

He also says that the IMF's recommendation to increase the interest rates and raise VAT from 7% to 10% doesn't apply to Thailand because it's special.

You know there is something wrong when the apparent rules of the market are suspended because Thailand is special.

  • Like 1
Posted

If the government was truly concerned about individual (poor) farmers who were in debt, then why didn't they target them directly.

I'm sure they could have set up a system with the bank whereby a farmers debt could have been written off & paid by the government, thus cutting out the "rice miller middleman" and saving untold billions in graft/corruption.

The rice market prices would have been as they should be, leaving the farmers to sell their present crops as normal, also no stock piles of rotting rice to try to hide.

But that's what common sense say's, not what the "Shin dynasty" want!!

  • Like 1
Posted
Commerce Minister Niwatthamlong Boonsongpaisarn reiterated today that the government’s rice pledging scheme helped to increase farmers’ earnings and clear their debts

If that was true, I would think that public debt would decline instead of rise to previous unknow levels

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/675653-thailand-august-public-debts-at-4463-of-gdp/

BANGKOK, Oct 19 – Thailand’s public debt in August was Bt5.3 trillion, or 44.63 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), according to a senior Finance Ministry official report.

Previously unknown?

Public-debt_tcm2590-385779.jpg

Do you have a graph for private debt, which would be much more logical in his statement?

Well, he did specifically mention public debt... I can't find a chart for household debt to GDP, or household debt to disposal income which would probably be the best measurement, although obviously it's not like every household is a receipient of the rice scheme. Domestic credit to private sector has been rising since 2006, but more strongly since 2010: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FS.AST.PRVT.GD.ZS/countries/1W-TH?display=graph but obviously that includes all of the private sector, so perhaps not that useful here.

The Forbes piece posted here before though, says: "Thailand’s household debt grew at an alarming 13.6 percent per year since 2008, bringing the country’s household debt-to-GDP ratio to 77 percent from 55 percent, which is up radically from just 45 percent a decade ago. Total lending to Thai households increased at a 17 percent annual rate from 2010 to 2012, while household credit provided by credit card, leasing and personal loan companies rose at a blistering 27 percent annual rate."

But then there were contigent reasons in the last couple of years why borrowing might have increased. Mainly the first car scheme, and to repair flood damaged homes I guess but then with the wages increase, disposal income may have risen for many of the poorest so they might be able to afford to borrow more?

Posted

Commerce says rice scheme raises farmers earning, clears debts

rice-mill-wpcf_728x413.jpg

Commerce Minister Niwatthamlong Boonsongpaisarn reiterated today that the governments rice pledging scheme helped to increase farmers earnings and clear their debts, though it would inflict loss of over 100 billion baht a year.

Niwatthamlongs assurance of the rice subsidy scheme came after he was asked to comment on recommendation by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to terminated the scheme and look to other stimulus measures that could enhance economy instead

The commerce minister who is also deputy prime minister said that he has not yet informed of such recommendation from authorities and therefore could not make a comment on it.

However he said that he did not know of which sources the IMF has managed to obtain the information from.

He admitted that the rice pledging scheme had inflicted loss of about 80 billion baht a year on every government in the past, saying that this year was high of over 100 billion baht a year or 20 billion baht more, due to the amount of rice the government bought from farmers was high.

But he insisted that the rice pledging scheme did benefit the farmers because they obtained high revenues that enabled them to pay off their debts

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/commerce-says-rice-scheme-raises-farmers-earning-clears-debts/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=commerce-says-rice-scheme-raises-farmers-earning-clears-debts

--Thai PBS 2013-11-13

How do you tell if a Thai politician is lying and bulls****ing ......... He has a pulse!

It is embarrasing to read sometimes. I think over to world news for me.

What small farmer (the actual ones that voted PTP in power) benefitted ???

Because he NEVER quote" benefitted the farmer because they obtained high revenues, enabling them to pay off debts"

This small voter obtained high revenues ?????

I think someone somewhere is bypassing this little voter.

One other factor missing from the equation is that the increase in the CPI has more than negated any increase in the wealth of the farmers.

It may well be that they have more disposable income as a result of the scheme, but all of that simply disappears when they pay their monthly grocery bills!

  • Like 1
Posted

Now we are just waiting for darling Yinglucks comment: "IMF is not my father!!"whistling.gif

Right on SOI41.

After all PM Yingluck is a 'Brazen Liberal' and the Prime Minister of Thailand, lao dtair Poo.

Posted

Quote "40% premiums on rice won't be enough to save this government from falling on its sword." so will we see many hardly used Toyota pick up for sale soon?

Posted

The nice graph seems to come from the "Economist Intelligence Unit" ( http://www.eiu.com/ )

After a bit of searching I found the graph in an October 2011 article which also has

"It remains unclear how much Puea Thai's pledges will cost, but public finances remain strong enough to withstand some countercyclical fiscal expansion. After hitting a high of 57.8% of GDP in 2000, public debt declined throughout Thaksin's six-year term of office, falling to 41.1% of GDP by 2006; it crept up in 2009, but remained relatively low, at 43.1% of GDP, in 2010."

http://www.aig.com/Thailand-Political-Confrontation_2590_385784.html

A more recent article from September 2012 has

"Fiscal policy is set to remain expansionary and public debt will rise relative to GDP. On August 28th the House of Representatives (the lower house) approved the government's Bt2.4trn (US$76.4bn) budget for fiscal year 2012/13 (October-September), representing a spending rise of almost 10%."

http://www.reportbuyer.com/countries/asia_pacific/thailand/country_risk_service_thailand_september_2012.html


Previously unknown?

== nice graph ==

Posted

Commerce says rice scheme raises farmers earning, clears debts

rice-mill-wpcf_728x413.jpg

Commerce Minister Niwatthamlong Boonsongpaisarn reiterated today that the governments rice pledging scheme helped to increase farmers earnings and clear their debts, though it would inflict loss of over 100 billion baht a year.

Niwatthamlongs assurance of the rice subsidy scheme came after he was asked to comment on recommendation by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to terminated the scheme and look to other stimulus measures that could enhance economy instead

The commerce minister who is also deputy prime minister said that he has not yet informed of such recommendation from authorities and therefore could not make a comment on it.

However he said that he did not know of which sources the IMF has managed to obtain the information from.

He admitted that the rice pledging scheme had inflicted loss of about 80 billion baht a year on every government in the past, saying that this year was high of over 100 billion baht a year or 20 billion baht more, due to the amount of rice the government bought from farmers was high.

But he insisted that the rice pledging scheme did benefit the farmers because they obtained high revenues that enabled them to pay off their debts

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/commerce-says-rice-scheme-raises-farmers-earning-clears-debts/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=commerce-says-rice-scheme-raises-farmers-earning-clears-debts

--Thai PBS 2013-11-13

How do you tell if a Thai politician is lying and bulls****ing ......... He has a pulse!

It is embarrasing to read sometimes. I think over to world news for me.

Sound like politicians from most any country.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...