Jump to content

Petition to expel Thammasat student activist attracts 3,000 signatures


webfact

Recommended Posts

Petition To Expel Student Activist Attracts 3,000 Signatures
By Khaosod Online

stu.jpg

BANGKOK: -- Over 3,000 Thammasat University students and alumni have signed the petition calling for the expulsion of an outspoken student activist, Matichon has reported.

Mr. Ong-on Phu-arkard, the Thammasat alumnus who headed the expulsion campaign, explained to Matichon that the transgender activist Aum Neko has disrespected the university in many occasions.

Those offences include dressing inappropriately, using impolite words to the lecturers, and, recently, attemptingto replace the Thai national flag over Thammasat University′s administrative building with a black flag, ostensibly to protest the university rector′s biased political perspectives.

Mr. Ong-on said Ms. Aum, whose real name is Mr. Saran Chuichai, has violated other people′s rights with these actions. 3,050 students and alumni have signed the petition, he added.

The petition was accepted by Thammasat Rector Somkid Lertpaithoon, who told Matichon that Ms. Aum had displayed many inappropriate actions, such as climbing onto the statue of Mr. Pridi Banomyong, the co-plotter of the 1932 revolution which toppled the Siamese Absolute Monarchy and the founder of Thammasat University.

These repeated offences have forced the university administration to set up an investigation committee headed by Vice Rector Prinya Thaewanarumitkul to determine the punishment for Ms. Aum, Mr. Somkid said.

He added that the committee has proposed a one-year suspension as the punishment, but Ms. Aum′s family has contacted the university and asked for a one-semester suspension instead. Mr. Somkid said the decision will be announced in 1-2 weeks.

Furthermore, Mr. Somkid said another committee will also be formed to investigate the ′black flag′ incident for a separate punishment. As for the petition calling for Ms. Aum′s expulsion, Mr. Somkid said if her offences do not qualify for the expulsion described by university guidelines, she cannot be expelled.

Source: http://www.khaosod.co.th/en/view_newsonline.php?newsid=TVRNNE5qZ3lOalV4TkE9PQ==

kse.png
-- Khaosod English 2013-12-13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt that Pridi himself would have much time for those who've signed this petition, nor some of the hacks currently masquerading as academics. Their job should be to encourage criticial thought, not suppress it.

What critical thought is a female student expressing by climbing on the statue of the university's founder and and positioning her crotch next to the statue's crotch?

post-88861-0-68051900-1386930228_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt that Pridi himself would have much time for those who've signed this petition, nor some of the hacks currently masquerading as academics. Their job should be to encourage criticial thought, not suppress it.

What critical thought is a female student expressing by climbing on the statue of the university's founder and and positioning her crotch next to the statue's crotch?

I think Verdi should be banned. Boring , noisy crap. I will start a petition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt that Pridi himself would have much time for those who've signed this petition, nor some of the hacks currently masquerading as academics. Their job should be to encourage criticial thought, not suppress it.

Very true, she looks pridi good to me.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, the " thought police" out in force....

She isn't being prevented from thinking whatever she wants to think nor is she prevented from expressing those thoughts as long as it's done in a way that doesn't deprive others of their rights. I would assume admission to the university involved acceptance of some guidelines regarding behavior. A university should be a place where differing views are expressed, tolerated and debated, not where one individual or group takes the entire institution hostage and forces her/their ideas on everyone else.

If she feels sufficiently passionate about the importance of whatever she's promoting to violate the rules of the institution, that's fine but then she has to accept the cost. It's very noble to say you'll sacrifice yourself for the cause, but then you have to be prepared to actually make the sacrifice.

Edited by Suradit69
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, the " thought police" out in force....

She isn't being prevented from thinking whatever she wants to think nor is she prevented from expressing those thoughts as long as it's done in a way that doesn't deprive others of their rights. I would assume admission to the university involved acceptance of some guidelines regarding behavior. A university should be a place where differing views are expressed, tolerated and debated, not where one individual or group takes the entire institution hostage and forces her/their ideas on everyone else.

If she feels sufficiently passionate about the importance of whatever she's promoting to violate the rules of the institution, that's fine but then she has to accept the cost. It's very noble to say you'll sacrifice yourself for the cause, but then you have to be prepared to actually make the sacrifice.

Depriving others of their rights?facepalm.gif They still haven't worked out what rules she/he has broken.

In a country that allows, if not promotes, lawbreaking by all sectors of society, how the hell is it justified to punish someone who has broken no identifiable rule or law?

I hope you are not a member of the 'hang 'em high' brigade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A pridi farce will get you a long way ad philatelly will get you anywhere in a topsy turvey corrupt world where students are reactionary and ignorant and peasants wise to their intolerance.

I'm sure it's all a Sturm in a Mr T cup.The T party awaits.Sad the yoof have so little to say about the injustices of inequality,squalor,poor health care just across the river fromtheir privileged campus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9% of students signing a petition implies that 91% are in the 'don't give a sh1t' or support baskets regarding the rebellious one. I imagine the Faculty of Political and Moral Sciences (whatever that is, it's not getting through to the movers and shakers in this country) are having a real hard time with this. Maybe it's an experiment to illustrate how a vocal minority can manufacture issues, instil prejudice and division in order to exert influence. Really, if the student has broken the rules, why is there the need for a petition, just deal with it. Surely the University is capable of deciding the best course of action without allowing what is basically an attention seeker getting just that, more attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems 3,000 students are there for an education.

If one student's behavior makes that uncomfortable, difficult or impossible, expulsion seems like a reasonable solution.

Has nothing to do with the "thought police". It's about 3,000 people getting what they paid for.

Whatever she did, it has ZERO impact on other students . They are making a political statement and victimising one individual. It is a pathetic overreaction. If the other students don't agree, they can say so...no one is stopping them. However, they want to 'cleanse' the reputation of the university. Bullies, pure and simple

What Nonsense you spout a uni is no place for a publicity seeking transgender to set the rules, if he cannot comply kick him out. let the other kids concentrate on getting educated.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How very sad to see students signing petitions to have a fellow student expelled. Maybe these same students will soon be petitioning for any students supporting Pheu Thai to be expelled.

It is up to the administrators at the University to adjudicate on whether or not this student should be 'rusticated' not fellow students.

I would personally sign a petition that called for all students who blew whistles and invaded government buildings to be sent down.

Their infantile behaviour did their University no credit. No wonder Thailand's educational achievements are so woeful when compared to the rest of SE Asia.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems 3,000 students are there for an education.

If one student's behavior makes that uncomfortable, difficult or impossible, expulsion seems like a reasonable solution.

Has nothing to do with the "thought police". It's about 3,000 people getting what they paid for.

3000 out of how many?

Saying how many oppose her without knowing how many students are there is pointless.

And I'm very curious about that 3000. Were they paid to sign the petition like locals are paid to vote?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...