Jump to content

Bangkok: NSC blames Phan Fa Bridge violence on third party


Recommended Posts

Posted

NSC blames violence on third party

BANGKOK, 19 February 2014 (NNT) – According to the National Security Council (NSC), the violence that took place on Tuesday during police operation to retake public areas was triggered by a third party intervention.


NSC Secretary General Lt Gen Paradorn Pattanathabutr affirmed that the riot police did not use any live bullets or lethal weapons against the anti-government protesters during Tuesday’s operation, but the violent incidents that claimed 4 lives and 66 injuries were instigated by an unknown group, adding that the police are now investigating the matter.

Lt Gen Paradorn reiterated that the frontline police were only carrying crowd control equipment which included batons and shields, while admitting that the backup units did have weapons to deal with shooting incidents. He also expressed his personal belief that if the guns had actually been used by the police, it would have been only to help the frontline unit pull back or in a rescue mission only.

He went on to express his satisfaction with Tuesday’s operation, saying it went according to plans as police officers were able to reclaim areas around the Ministry of Energy.

nnt]2014-02-19[/nnt]

Posted

NSC Secretary General Lt Gen Paradorn Pattanathabutr affirmed that the riot police did not use any live bullets or lethal weapons against the anti-government protesters . . . He also expressed his personal belief that if the guns had actually been used by the police, it would have been only to help the frontline unit pull back or in a rescue mission only.

So, definitely no live bullets or lethal weapons used by the Police, except maybe they were but he's not sure.

If you look at the numerous pictures going around it's quite obvious that the Police WERE using live bullets AND lethal weapons including handguns, assault and sniper rifles, same as whoever the "third party" might have been. I won't speculate who fired the first shots, video's also seem to clear that one up.

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

  • Like 2
Posted

It's so far declaration of Chalerm and Surapong that said protester fire on themself.........

They a lot of pictures and clip show police fire with M16 in direction of protester (thanks to foreign media)

perhaps it's fake policemen whistling.gif

Posted (edited)

Prbkk post # 4

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

Well Prbkk you're here and you come up withsome interesting theories.

No doubt those old multi tipple minds of mighty gums Chalerm have been going into binge thinking ( dammed lisp I can't say dr) mode and provoking strange D.T (double take) reactions.whistling.gif

Edited by siampolee
  • Like 2
Posted

are there no people on the middle ground. are all thais really so polarised.

there seem to be no more voices of reason all of a sudden and I think life under either party, should this be a fight to the death, will be unbearable for us all.

  • Like 2
Posted

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

Or people bleating about nefarious elites, judicial coups, protestors bombing themselves, etc, etc...

the Ammart is VERY, VERY real and is well known to almost every Thai you talk to and they, dear poster, are behind Suthep's fascist crusade to save the Masters and enslave the people

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

" He also expressed his personal belief that if the guns had actually been used by the police, it would have been only to help the frontline unit pull back or in a rescue mission only. "

The reporters on the ground contradict this account implicitly. They reported that the police went in using live ammunition and tear-gas on the protesters.

This police official's quote is worded in a very deceptive way. Why must it be relegated to his " personal belief " ? Does that mean he is simply taking the word of the police ? And why go on to use the word " if " ? If he is sure of his opinion, why would he admit the possibility of an armed response by using the word " if " ? This sentence is on balance a tacit admission.

Edited by Scamper
Posted

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

Noooo....Surapong called in his martian friends....I have photos of their spacecraft landing near Phan Fa.

Posted

Here we go again with ' 3rd party ', ' unseen hands ', ' evil spirits ' etc.

On the ' IF ' guns had been used comment, BBC World last night clearly showed police officers firing shotguns. Irrespective of who opened fire first the Lt. Gen is dodging the issue and making a mess of it.

Posted

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

Or people bleating about nefarious elites, judicial coups, protestors bombing themselves, etc, etc...

the Ammart is VERY, VERY real and is well known to almost every Thai you talk to and they, dear poster, are behind Suthep's fascist crusade to save the Masters and enslave the people

Except that faction of the Ammart that is with Thaksin,

and those sections of the Ammart that are with other potential leaderships.

It's not like there is JUST ONE Ammart, and that it is 100% lockstep with the old feudal ideas.

That's one of the problems with Thailand, there are dozens of different cliques all trying to one up their rivals.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

Watch the video and make up your own mind then!
Word of warning! Extremelly graphic!
Edited by Tywais
Removed overly graphic video link
Posted

It's so far declaration of Chalerm and Surapong that said protester fire on themself.........

They a lot of pictures and clip show police fire with M16 in direction of protester (thanks to foreign media)

perhaps it's fake policemen whistling.gif

And they were well mixed within the normal policemen....Maybe all the policemen were fake 3rd party policemen.

And Chalerm didn't tell to attack them...It was a fake Chalerm laugh.png

Posted

It's so far declaration of Chalerm and Surapong that said protester fire on themself.........

They a lot of pictures and clip show police fire with M16 in direction of protester (thanks to foreign media)

perhaps it's fake policemen whistling.gif

And they were well mixed within the normal policemen....Maybe all the policemen were fake 3rd party policemen.

And Chalerm didn't tell to attack them...It was a fake Chalerm laugh.png

MMmmmmm the Men in Black all over. So 5 yrs later nothing has changed, life is nothing in Thailand. Thai on Thai over Power to run the country.

Posted

Funny i saw pixs in msn.com.us the front runner police. They were lined up pointing shotguns and the Rueters reporter on scene stated the police were using LIVE ammunition.

This is a mute point being that THIS TIME the protests were on public grounds as stated in this headline which makes their protest protected by their constitution and also makes any violence against them illegal. That makes the CMPO and everbody that attacked these protesters a criminal and responsible for any violence that took place there.

Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

Police fighting protestors. Both sides were shooting at each other. Police blame unnamed 'third party' who shot dead protestors. Yeah conspiracy theory. rolleyes.gif

Posted

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

Or people bleating about nefarious elites, judicial coups, protestors bombing themselves, etc, etc...

the Ammart is VERY, VERY real and is well known to almost every Thai you talk to and they, dear poster, are behind Suthep's fascist crusade to save the Masters and enslave the people

LOL! Here we go again with the 'well known Ammarts' who can't even be named! Talk about conspiracy theorists! clap2.gif

Posted

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

Forget that for a moment and ask instead why they whine about people calling their friends thugs but resort to name calling of government officials and posters who do not agree with them. Some of these threads have been hi-jacked by school yard bullies who more than often contradict themselves.

One can disagree with opinions of posters or Thai officials without resorting to personal insults and name calling.

Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Thailand

Posted

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

Or people bleating about nefarious elites, judicial coups, protestors bombing themselves, etc, etc...

the Ammart is VERY, VERY real and is well known to almost every Thai you talk to and they, dear poster, are behind Suthep's fascist crusade to save the Masters and enslave the people

Q.E.D

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

A hollow, ethereal sound as a voice from the dead could be heard, almost in reminiscing that fateful April, 10th 2010 with it's similar mysteries, "no one saw me".

Posted

Third party again. Who are these people that makes the third party? The RS/UDD have been on low profile. They know they cannot fight the judges and officials of independence agencies. They know they cannot fight the military tanks and their war weapons. I don't think they want to give 'weapons' to the military, judges, officials of independence agencies and the sufferers of Thaksinitis and Thaksinphobics.

I suggest NSC should focus more on getting at the 'third party.'

Posted

Yeah 4 dead and it's a 'third party'. Your police were armed and they shot the protestors. Why can't you admit it? Your 'personal beliefs' mean nothing since you're just as dishonest as the masters you serve.

Why does Thailand attract so many farang conspiracy theorists? Next it will be sightings of Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa having lunch in Thong Lor

I agree that there are plenty of conspiracy theorists on here, as well as those 'lao khao' soaked farangs without anything much better to do. In this case however I think the conspiracy is the existence of 'unknown third parties'. Someone knows full well who they are, and someone is controlling them. It just seems to convenient to blame them for all the atrocities and violence carried out since 2010.

Posted

This photo came up in Facebook yesterday.

I don't know the origin or circumstance of the incident it was taken.

It´s sure a professional sniper gun he´s carrying. Similar to a Remongton M24.

Can somebody give more info of it?

post-3436-1392751993,07_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...