Jump to content

Pollution Control Dept. told to clamp down on smoke-belching Bangkok buses


webfact

Recommended Posts

Pollution Control Department told to clamp down on smoke-belching buses

bus-black-smoke-wpcf_728x413.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The Supreme Administrative Court has ordered the Pollution Control Department to clamp down on smoke-belching buses of the Bangkok Mass Transit Authority and its concessionaires and to submit follow-up reports to the court every three months for a period of one year.

The case was first brought to the consideration of the Administrative Court by the Emissions Prevention and Environment Protection Foundation and city residents affected by excessive emissions from the city buses.

The court dismissed the charges of negligence of duty lodged against the Pollution Control Department but ordered the BMTA to stop allowing buses which release excessive smoke emissions on run on the city streets.

However, the Supreme Administrative Court faulted the BMTA and held the Pollution Control Department accountable by ordering the department to clamp down on smoke-belching buses and to report to the court every three months.

Meanwhile, the Anti-Global Warming Foundation and 23 other people lodged a lawsuit with the Administrative Court seeking the revocation of the operating licences of operators of Bus Route 8 infamous for reckless driving and road accidents.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/pollution-control-department-told-clamp-smoke-belching-buses/

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2014-04-04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they actually going to define exactly what excessive smoke emissions are? Like CO content and hydrocarbons content, or is just if it looks a bit black it's no good?

You may find that there is already law in place in that regard. 20 years ago they started measuring the exhaust of public buses and trucks. They had numerous test machines to stick in the exhaust and rev the engine.... These were much more reliable than the undercar bomb detector units purchased a few years later!! However, TiT and like many good projects gets shoved aside for an incoming "regime" change of focus, unfortunately.....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many years / decades has it taken them to speak up about this?

All of those buses should be driven to the scap yard and the government should put new ones on the road.....hahahaha maybe after they build the high speed train to Chiang Mai hahaha

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they're gonna clamp down (there's that word again) on vehicle fumes, are they gonna stop the auto shops selling the straight through exhausts that most trucks and pickups seem to have? You know, the really *uckin* loud ones that not only choke you but deafen people too?

Just wondering whistling.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as used tires better to grind them up and mix in to asphalt for roads new and repair That way cheaper to repair and road lasts longer in return doing that in US and works great reduces landfill too. Plastic recycle to make product to sell like trays chairs for schools you can create a whole industry doing that. metals recycle the japanese will buy all you got.same with glass theres gold in that thrash especially old computers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

theyve been saying this for more than 20 years but nothing happens to clean up.

they could have bought the London bendy buses for a good price when they were pensioned off but didnt and they were cleaner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This crackdown has been announced every year in the 12 years I have been here,nothing happens it just justifies someone's position that he /she is seen to be doing something. The whole country is a joke environmental concerns are just words that they probably don't even understand.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pollution?

I thought they were having a clampdown on illegal parking.

Whatever happened to that?

I think that was a "crack-down" ... not a "clamp-down". Different department. (Ministry of Crack-Downs)

blink.png

EDIT

This crackdown has been announced every year in the 12 years I have been here

"Clamp-Down". I know ... it's confusing.

Edited by Fullstop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

theyve been saying this for more than 20 years but nothing happens to clean up.

they could have bought the London bendy buses for a good price when they were pensioned off but didnt and they were cleaner

Thailand is supposed to be dirty best keep your buses in pommyland
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More ill-conceived dictums......

Black smoke from diesels is unpleasant and the particulates from diesels are particularly dangerous, but essentially it is carbon........but FAR MORE DANGEROUS are the pollutants released UNSEEN from poorly tuned gasoline engines, which of they do nothing about.

As ever because they can see it they like to think they are doing something but they are too blind to do anything about the invisible elephant in the room

Edited by wilcopops
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a shame! A city full of brandnew Toyotas, Mazdas and Isuzus, on top, hundreds of thousands of BMWs, Benz, Minis and Lexus, all worth millions and millions of baht. But a public mass transport system that consists (apart from MRT and BTS) of 30 or 40 year old dangerous, uncomfortable, lousy, energy-wasting and air-polluting buses. The look of the vehicles, the rotten bus stops, the confusing line-denotation, the missing maps and the nonexistent time-tables says it all. Thailand has gone a wrong way for many years in focusing on individual transportation, and abandonding public bus transport.

BTW in the 60ties Thais used to cycle a lot and there was a tramway in Bangkok - all gone....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among the many reasons this ruling will likely never bring about any major change:

1. there's apparently no time deadline set by the court for the BMTA to rid its fleet of the polluting buses.

2. there's apparently no financial penalty (fines) imposed by the court if the BMTA fails to comply with its ruling.

Without a deadline and fines to back it up, what do you expect the BMTA is going to do? Pretty much nothing.

Wonder what, if any progress, will be shown in the quarterly reports that are supposed to be filed with the court?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they actually going to define exactly what excessive smoke emissions are? Like CO content and hydrocarbons content, or is just if it looks a bit black it's no good?

Small particle pollution is more health damaging than gaseous air pollution. It is too much if you can see the smoke. If you can see the smoke, the injectors need to be replaced inexpensive part but you do need down time for the bus and pay a mechanic to change them. Why must they be threatened with prosecution to do their jobs. Because the budget they get, barely covers the 'skim' leaving not enough for actual enforcement of the well-defined rules.

Edited by rametindallas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.






×
×
  • Create New...