Jump to content

It's common for anti-graft bodies to face threats: TI


Recommended Posts

Posted

"This is unacceptable behaviour and it shows that all politicians are alike, since they value themselves more than their country.

Yes but why let them get away with it? - Start arresting them place them on work details (sweeping the streets) they are supposed to represent the people - thuggery is a violation of my rights so have the law intervene and clean out these crooks and take the Pattaya Russian mafia with them - Crime & Corruption is rampant in Thailand and we have labourers asking for a payrise whilst those in charge dig their snouts further into the "public purse"

  • Like 1
Posted

Problem is, that the post 2006 coup installed NACC aren't actually independent at all. They work for elite interests, not the law, constitution or the people. Cases against Abhisit have been pending for years while with Yingluck, as soon as the opportunity for a judical coup comes up, they spring into action.

They might have a case, i don't know, but one thing i do know is that they are most certainly not independent, and when reforms are started post election, this group in particular needs to be investigated.

  • Like 1
Posted

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

Problem is, that the post 2006 coup installed NACC aren't actually independent at all. They work for elite interests, not the law, constitution or the people. Cases against Abhisit have been pending for years while with Yingluck, as soon as the opportunity for a judical coup comes up, they spring into action.

They might have a case, i don't know, but one thing i do know is that they are most certainly not independent, and when reforms are started post election, this group in particular needs to be investigated.

I think you will find that to work outside of the law frame work would have the people of Thailand up in arms, including the academic's that monitor these cases and the press. it seems you have a limited memory and a altered history syndrome when it comes to your support for your team, I support neither ,I do favour the democrats only because they don't continue to intimidate and thumb their nose at the law and are not as radical as the PTP supporters ,don't buy votes are not corrupt , and will you give me just one program instigated by the PTP in the last four years , that has been a success, further more I can see glaring examples lately where the sitting PTP members have been in contempt of court, or would have been in a democratic run country.

  • Like 1
Posted

It's laughable that Surapong has worked himself into a sweat for the first time in his life sending out letters to the international community to get support and condemnation for his enemies.

Now that Transparency International have come out to criticize the ruling party, I suppose the attitude is going to be along the lines of ......

'TI is not my father'.

  • Like 2
Posted

Problem is, that the post 2006 coup installed NACC aren't actually independent at all. They work for elite interests, not the law, constitution or the people. Cases against Abhisit have been pending for years while with Yingluck, as soon as the opportunity for a judical coup comes up, they spring into action.

They might have a case, i don't know, but one thing i do know is that they are most certainly not independent, and when reforms are started post election, this group in particular needs to be investigated.

So which corruption cases against Abhisit have been pending for years?

And even if it would be true what argument is that: Let Yingluck be corrupt because Abhisit is also corrupt????

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

For those that defend the intimidation of independent agencies - intimidation that has, by the way, included very real physical threats in the form of grenade attacks - with " well, they're not really independent, you see " - congratulations - you've just earned the Thida diploma. It's all she requires. No other line required. It's a line Jatuporn and Nattawut utter again and again. It's also a line used the world over again and again when local independent agencies are threatened, as Transparency International would be quick to inform you.

There's no justification for the threatening of anyone, under any pretext, let alone constitutionally empowered institutions. Period.

Edited by Scamper
  • Like 1
Posted

Problem is, that the post 2006 coup installed NACC aren't actually independent at all. They work for elite interests, not the law, constitution or the people. Cases against Abhisit have been pending for years while with Yingluck, as soon as the opportunity for a judical coup comes up, they spring into action.

They might have a case, i don't know, but one thing i do know is that they are most certainly not independent, and when reforms are started post election, this group in particular needs to be investigated.

Grow up.

Posted

It's laughable that Surapong has worked himself into a sweat for the first time in his life sending out letters to the international community to get support and condemnation for his enemies.

Now that Transparency International have come out to criticize the ruling party, I suppose the attitude is going to be along the lines of ......

'TI is not my father'.

I'm sure number 1 cousin will explain to the international community that all this intimidation is being carried out by the mysterious "third hand" working in conjunction with the fascist thug leader Suthep to discredit the democratically caretaker government who have the true people's mandate. The PTP, UDD, Thakisn, Yingluck and all the Shin clan simply want to be treated fairly and advocate peace. Then return to running the country their way and only their way.

He knows this because the DG of CAPO personally told him. He knows who is behind all the intimidation but can't reveal it yet. Begins with the letter...................

He'll be confident the international community will believe him.

Posted

I agree with Moonao about the functioning of the NACC in Thailand.

It therefore surprised me that an organisation with the name of "Transparency" International would issue such a politically-biassed statement. However whilst TI is an NGO, it is token and establishment. It was founded by the World Bank, and its board of directors are all establishment figures - http://www.transparency.org/whoweare/organisation/board_of_directors/1/.

Whilst any in-roads into corruption is helpful TI in Thailand is only making token efforts - check their website - http://www.transparency-thailand.org/eng/

Posted

Problem is, that the post 2006 coup installed NACC aren't actually independent at all. They work for elite interests, not the law, constitution or the people. Cases against Abhisit have been pending for years while with Yingluck, as soon as the opportunity for a judical coup comes up, they spring into action.

They might have a case, i don't know, but one thing i do know is that they are most certainly not independent, and when reforms are started post election, this group in particular needs to be investigated.

IT think contrary NACC is the official anti-graft agency in Thailand and recognize by United Nations Convention Against Corruption

For World community is an independent body

  • Like 1
Posted

Absolutely spot on. Now we wait for Thaksin to announce angrily 'TI is not my father'. The PTP detritus deserve to be banged up for a long time for many reasons, but this just adds yet more to their long list of misdeeds...

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...