oldsailor35 Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 Hundreds lost their life saving because of his pyaramid scheme. Skip the country when convicted for corruption. He has many business and personal enemies. Too insignificant for any political assination. Case close. The only victims of pyramid schemes are greedy people who seek to enrich themselves without real work. Now that is only your idea of things, i know some very nice hard working people who were tricked by a pyramid scheme. Those hard working people had saved their money and thought that they were investing in something honest and safe. Shame on you. You are an arrogant grub of the lowest order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsailor35 Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 Might be a good idea if Prayuth could find a way of disbanding this "Limit of Statuations law" There are probably quite a few criminals depending on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emster23 Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 I would not cry if some of the BIB visited higher ups at Goldman Sachs to give them similar justice for their pyramid scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Loh Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 Hundreds lost their life saving because of his pyaramid scheme. Skip the country when convicted for corruption. He has many business and personal enemies. Too insignificant for any political assination. Case close. Still trying to defend Thaksin by deflection, you really are an outstanding sheeple of the highest order ! Yes Akeyuth was a nasty piece of work, but the facts in his disappearance speak for themselves. Don't try and defend the murderers, there is no defence for it ! Nope furthest from my mind to defend Taksin and by the way, what has this case got to do with him. Akeyuth, ponzi mastermind who defrauded hundreds of investors was a scumbag and anyone who have waited to take their revenge. He is loud and arrogant and a show-off and would attract any undesirables to cash in on him. As for political reason,I am trying very hard to find a motive. Honesty, just how many know or even heard of him before the 4 seasons and his murder. He is an irritant but insignificant in politics. He is not even in politics or hold any position in any high profile agencies or organisation. What big political gains to get rid of him. Why that so hard to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandhurstmolonski Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 Hundreds lost their life saving because of his pyramid scheme. Skip the country when convicted for corruption. He has many business and personal enemies. Too insignificant for any political assignation. Case close. In The West , many individuals basically guilty of same walk free .. So many Schemes . However , was it really worth it ? ..Actions like this on either side can never be condoned . Many Pyramid Schemes , and Ponzi schemes remain legal though out South East Asia , and the Western World . Im sure many famous brands come to mind . Karma ? ..Maybe ? ...But , its still not the way to deal with it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 Hundreds lost their life saving because of his pyaramid scheme. Skip the country when convicted for corruption. He has many business and personal enemies. Too insignificant for any political assination. Case close. Still trying to defend Thaksin by deflection, you really are an outstanding sheeple of the highest order ! Yes Akeyuth was a nasty piece of work, but the facts in his disappearance speak for themselves. Don't try and defend the murderers, there is no defence for it ! Nope furthest from my mind to defend Taksin and by the way, what has this case got to do with him. Akeyuth, ponzi mastermind who defrauded hundreds of investors was a scumbag and anyone who have waited to take their revenge. He is loud and arrogant and a show-off and would attract any undesirables to cash in on him. As for political reason,I am trying very hard to find a motive. Honesty, just how many know or even heard of him before the 4 seasons and his murder. He is an irritant but insignificant in politics. He is not even in politics or hold any position in any high profile agencies or organisation. What big political gains to get rid of him. Why that so hard to see. "Too insignificant for any political assination. Case close." "What big political gains to get rid of him. Why that so hard to see." This may surprise you, Eric, but courts of law mostly require some move 'solid' proof that just the odd "can't you see". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tingtongteesood Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 Hundreds lost their life saving because of his pyaramid scheme. Skip the country when convicted for corruption. He has many business and personal enemies. Too insignificant for any political assination. Case close. Still trying to defend Thaksin by deflection, you really are an outstanding sheeple of the highest order ! Yes Akeyuth was a nasty piece of work, but the facts in his disappearance speak for themselves. Don't try and defend the murderers, there is no defence for it ! Nope furthest from my mind to defend Taksin and by the way, what has this case got to do with him. Akeyuth, ponzi mastermind who defrauded hundreds of investors was a scumbag and anyone who have waited to take their revenge. He is loud and arrogant and a show-off and would attract any undesirables to cash in on him. As for political reason,I am trying very hard to find a motive. Honesty, just how many know or even heard of him before the 4 seasons and his murder. He is an irritant but insignificant in politics. He is not even in politics or hold any position in any high profile agencies or organisation. What big political gains to get rid of him. Why that so hard to see. "Too insignificant for any political assination. Case close." "What big political gains to get rid of him. Why that so hard to see." This may surprise you, Eric, but courts of law mostly require some move 'solid' proof that just the odd "can't you see". Google is your friend Eric, do some research. He had been a thorn in Thaksin's side for a long time and was threatening to twist the knife. You do the math... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDweeb Posted June 16, 2014 Share Posted June 16, 2014 "Akeyuth became rich running a pyramid scheme two decades ago, and stayed in self-imposed exile until the statute of limitations in the case against him ran out." Appears to be a bit of an undesireable... So were most of the 2500+ "drug dealers" who got terminated probably, however most here would not argue that their sleaziness and criminality warranted summary execution. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumu Ali Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Not a can of worms but a bucket! not a bucket of worms but a barrel of worms how can it be that police are murdering?? the mind bogglez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloudhopper Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 (edited) Not a can of worms but a bucket! not a bucket of worms but a barrel of worms how can it be that police are murdering?? the mind bogglez It's always been a nice little earner for them. That's why the evidence was destroyed. edit - I wonder if those cops convicted of murder who were sentenced to death and then lost all their appeals are still out on bail? Edited June 17, 2014 by cloudhopper 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Deerhunter Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 "Akeyuth became rich running a pyramid scheme two decades ago, and stayed in self-imposed exile until the statute of limitations in the case against him ran out." Appears to be a bit of an undesireable... So were most of the 2500+ "drug dealers" who got terminated probably, however most here would not argue that their sleaziness and criminality warranted summary execution. Um, Apparently over 50% of them had no connection with drugs so the inference is drawn that it was a handy ruse to settle scores & also deal with pharmaceutical competitors in less than 50% of the cases. Allow a few % for hasty mistaken identity. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorecard Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Is anyone really bothered about the circumstances surrounding the death of someone who made a fortune from 'Pyramid Selling'? The world is a better place without such scum and why spend good money looking into how the low life was despatched. Good riddance to bad rubbish And if someone near / dear to you was punished, in any form, by a kangaroo court or similar, no doubt you would be the first to scream about equal access to justice / fair justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kannot Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 A missing hard drive with CCTV? People keeping silent? Driving for 10 hours in the wrong lane? What happened to harder crime scene evidence - it is impossible for any-one to walk into a room and leave some evidence of their own DNA behind and that is fact. Perhaps its time to re-visit the DNA trail, dna= did not appen.......here anyway!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now