Rewatching a TV show called Timeless about three people chasing through time to stop someone changing the future. Real historical characters interact with our heroes. The first episode which features the Hindenburg is an eye-opener. Recommended.
I also like Sugar, which starts off as one type of show and after a twist becomes a completely different animal.
I don't care if he has wisdom or not. I just want an end to a world economic scam in which the 1% reap profit while the peasants suffer. Burn it all down and start over with a system that benefits everyone, not just the 1%. If Trump is the cause, so be it.
I'm not a condo seller and live in a house - no vested interest in such rhetoric etc.
There are no significant plate boundaries close enough to Bangkok to cause an earthquake significant enough that it manifests itself with a localised amplified magnitude greater than we witnessed on Friday.
Liquefaction would play a factor in monsoon season due to a raised water table, particularly with a longe duration quake - however, the actual locallised magnitude (ML) is very unlikely (Geologically improbably to be higher than we saw on Friday.
We can 'argue there is / there isn't' but we're going round in circles.
For the purposes of interesting debate, I'm interested in is why you think 'why there is'...
I've explained that the Sagaing Fault, is not a direct boundary between two major tectonic plates, it forms part of a broader plate boundary and the stresses varies along it - This is why this boundary has never caused a fault as far south as Bankok - the slip rates are not significant enough to cause a quake powerful enough to be greater than the quake experienced on Friday.
Thats not to say, other 'similar' sized quakes from the Sagaing Fault complex can occur in the future (usually a major quake very 30-50 years or so - the stress takes time to build up based on the slip rate (of the strike-slip fault).
Recommended Posts