Jump to content

Thai politics: Govt may drop cases against politicians for sake of peace


webfact

Recommended Posts

BURNING ISSUE
Junta may drop cases against politicians for sake of peace

KRIS BHROMSUTHI

BANGKOK: -- Moves to impeach former PM Yingluck Shinawatra, former Senate speaker Nikom Wairatpanij and former House speaker Somsak Kiatsuranont, plus 38 former senators are expected to be decided by members of the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) by early next month.

These cases are some of the most highly anticipated issues since General Prayut Chan-o-cha staged the coup on May 22 because, from a political perspective, they will demonstrate the junta's capacity for flexibility and compromise in negotiating peace and reconciliation with key adversaries.

Indeed, the impeachment cases are more political than a fight for justice and or a battle of legal technicalities.

This was evident from the closed-door meeting when NLA members debated whether they should accept the impeachment case of Somsak and Nikom back in October last year.

The only reason for that was, in the context of national interest, there were fears of adverse reactions from people if they had heard of the sensitive topics that were discussed.

NLA members had their "role" to play - those who want to argue for or against accepting the impeachment cases may be hesitant to do so, fearing criticism.

The purpose of the closed-door meeting was to allow members to "speak their hearts" on a highly politicised issue without fear of scrutiny.

However, if it were to be merely a discussion about legal technicalities, there would have been no need for such a closed-door meeting.

And since these impeachment cases can be classified as highly political, there is strong reason to believe that Yingluck, Somsak, Nikom, plus the 38 other former senators will be let off the hook.

This is mainly because the junta has put high emphasis on security - by their decision to maintain martial law, their policy to "delay" local administration elections, and their refusal to confirm whether a referendum will be held on the new constitution, saying it depends on the security situation at the time. All of these actions came at great political cost, but the military was willing to do this to ensure security and stability.

Any decision by the NLA to impeach the former premier and her allies would have shaken the apparent peace in Thai society, as Pheu Thai and Thaksin sympathisers have questioned and rejected the legitimacy of the junta's appointed legislators from the start.

Deputy NLA President Peerasak Porchit came out yesterday to assure the public that each NLA member was free to vote as per their conscience, though people find this difficult to believe.

And, it is easy to assume that certain groups of people will be infuriated if the NLA decides to impeach some of their leaders.

Democrat leader Abhisit Vejjajiva noted recently that the impeachment cases in the NLA and the economy are two key matters that could become obstacles in the Prayut administration's work and progress.

Red-shirt leader Weng Tojirakarn said yesterday that if the NLA members decide they should vote in favour of impeachment, the red shirts are unlikely to organise movements because of martial law. However, he was sure that one or more decisions to impeach these people would fuel anger that could erupt in the foreseeable future.

Because of the political sensitivity and the potential consequences that could threaten security and stability, the impeachment cases have become political issues, rather than legal battles to distinguish between guilt and innocence.

The junta has the capacity not to go ahead with these impeachment cases in exchange for peace and order, as if to say: "Off you go. But stay quiet and let us get on with our jobs."

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Junta-may-drop-cases-against-politicians-for-sake--30251266.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-01-06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was evident from the closed-door meeting when NLA members debated whether they should accept the impeachment case of Somsak and Nikom back in October last year.

The only reason for that was, in the context of national interest, there were fears of adverse reactions from people if they had heard of the sensitive topics that were discussed.

It is always better to keep the people uninformed and unexposed to sensitive topics. The fact that it is their country, and their business should be of no importance to those in power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is why yingluck hasnt relocated to warmer pastures, she appears too relaxed about it all, not at all surprised she has known about this long time ago, OR she has sensitive info about the other political crooks and they just protecting their own arse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to be the norm here ,if your rich and influential,

no matter what you do you will never pay for your crimes,

while the poor are given the bums rush,straight to the nick,

no years of appeals for them.

Until this is corrected,the majority of the population will be

second class citizens,with little chance at real justice,and

forever under the heel of the privileged.

regards Worgeordie

Well, it might be a good idea to target the richest 2% or 5% of Thailand's people, and start reducing their wealth. How about higher taxes for Thailand's richest people, and use the tax income to start new projects. Projects that will try to close the gap between rich and poor in Thailand ??

But this is unlikely to happen. Thailand's rich, basically own and control Thailand. The rich are mainly a bunch of Chinese who have been in Thailand for generations, and they wear yellow rather than red.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few months ago, I was all for bringing these ‘servants of the people’ before the courts, and if found guilty, sequestrating their assets, locking them in cells and throwing away the keys. However, now I wonder what would that really achieve? Following Thaksin’s conviction, did his support diminish? No, his supporters simply cried ‘foul’ and carried on regardless.

However, if they decide to simply drop all charges, in the interests of security and reconciliation, then those same supporters will probably claim that the cases were dropped because there was no evidence, because there was no wrong-doing in the first place. This could create new and deeper anger against the current military leadership who deposed a democratically elected government, in part, on the basis of charges that were subsequently dropped.

On the other hand, if charges were dropped in the name of reconciliation, then PTP/UDD could possibly shout ‘fair-play’ to the General for introducing an ‘Amnesty Bill-Lite’. However, I certainly wouldn’t bet the farm on that reaction happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely by not applying any sanctions, punishments or anything then it is surely just condoning the actions in future. Surely this card can be played repeatedly if it's ok just once. All the while those who are forced to steal out of hardship are given years in jail. As long as 2 tier justice systems are openly operating then the country will never prosper.
I love Thailand but the vast vast majority of the politicians here should be thoroughly ashamed. They're holding the country and its people back for their own gains, be it financial or for favours / allowances. Disgusting

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got to agree with the statement that the NACC cases are more political than fight for justice or legal technicalities. Like the EC, the NACC has displayed prejudice and seen as selective targeting their opponents. There are cases like the malfeasance charges for the CRES 2010 actions and the Dem rice scheme that have been going for ages while the current cases have been rushed jobs. This is a fact not perception that infuriate the Reds that they have never been treated equally and have always been subjected to the elites power moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing changes, the cycle of politics, amnesty, reconciliation, protests et al continues as normal here in LoS.

I've said it before, ban ALL politicians and parties for life, on both sides, and start with a clean slate and some new younger faces and more parties. Never happen I know, too many vested interests on both sides to allow anything "too" radical to happen here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tainted with suspicion siampolee?

Banned from politics and public life.?

Why not just burn them at the stake !

No trial just suspicion!

Innocent until proven guilty I thought and not judged by an unelected military court but in the court of the people.

Totally agree. A "people's court" is also more likely to approve of burning at the stake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tainted with suspicion siampolee? Banned from politics and public life.?

Why not just burn them at the stake !

No trial just suspicion!

Innocent until proven guilty I thought and not judged by an unelected military court but in the court of the people.

I agree with you 100% ..... Why not just burn them at the stake.... Great idea..! clap2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""