Jump to content

Yingluck 'failed to address issues'


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

Yingluck 'failed to address issues'
The Nation

Former Democrat MP Warong Dechgitvigrom has expressed his dissatisfaction with former premier Yingluck Shinawatra's defence of her government's rice-pledging scheme before the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) yesterday.

Yingluck has been accused of dereliction of duty for allowing corruption and causing billions of baht in losses.

He said the former PM failed to explain herself on the allegation and deviated from the main reasons for the impeachment hearing.

Warong, a key figure grilling Yingluck in a censure debate over the rice-pledging, said Yingluck was trying to draw attention to an old story about assisting farmers to have better living conditions. "No one denies that farmers need immediate assistance. The problem is the mismanagement of the rice-pledging scheme, which caused severe losses to the farmers," Warong said.

He rebutted the former PM's statement that the impeachment could be considered a great challenge to the country's reconciliation and reform process.

Warong said the reform process and the impeachment proceedings should not be confused. "By citing the reconciliation and reform process in her conclusions, the former PM seems to ignore her own responsibility", Warong said.

"If the members of the NLA would like to perform their role in putting the country back on the right track, the impeachment of a wrongdoer would show the supremacy of the law", Warong stated.

However, the former premier's legal team was satisfied with Yingluck's clarification to the NLA. Pichit Chuenban, chief adviser to the Pheu thai legal team, said that Yinluck had addressed all the key points. He said her legal team was more concerned about pressure on the NLA to impeach the former premier. He did not say whether the former premier would attend the NLA hearing next Friday.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Yingluck-failed-to-address-issues-30251638.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-01-10

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny how yesterday's news was her lawyers comments how well she did at that hearing and how well she defended herself. I understand that press release was done by her lawyers. Did she think the truth would not come out about how she averted the main reason for her presence there? What a twit.

And this press release was done by the opposing political party. Why ascribe to either of them as "truth"?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yingluck 'failed to address issues'

No surprise, she failed at everything else as well especially running a country.

Well....can't blame her for everything......after all, shopping was always her forte.......and she looked rooly noice yesterday.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every Thai administration since time began (and since WWII most have been military) has raided the Treasury and commandeered the economy for their own enrichment.

There is not a senior military family, senior police family or top political family that does not have a net worth of over 10 million dollars and many are worth considerably more, exponentially more.

What is going on here is application of pressure in the 90-year-old battle for power and national resources between elected representatives (mainly with their constituencies in the North and North-Eastern regions and rural or industrial masses) and non-elected senior figures (mainly with their constituencies in the military, civil service, judiciary and royal court).

The impeachment proceedings and any subsequent impeachment will just be another negotiating lever for the non-elected senior figures to hammer out a better deal for their lot at the expense of the other lot. Neither side would like to devolve any power or resources to the people through better justice for the masses, better health care for the poor or better education for the non-wealthy.

Finally, could you imagine any senior military figure over the last five decades having to publicly account for their actions under threat of punishment from the government? No, it is not possible. They are accountable only to themselves.

... but ... but ... but the others ...

It seems not only Ms. Yingluck was reluctant to address the issue of a 'self-financing' scheme ending up costing the State and therefore the tax payers 700,000,000,000 Baht.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"failed to address the issues"

yea so did Obama, Bush, Cameron, Blair et al

Public office is, and should be, such that you cannot get 'sued', 'impeached' or 'witch-hunted' AFTER you leave office. When you are IN office you should come under CLOSE scrutiny of the public, press and watchdogs and ejected IF the voters votes you out OR you have committed an illegal act.

To hound someone AFTER they leave office is vindictive and absurd UNLESS it was an illegal act. No one has suggested the ex-PM acted illegally they just want to grind her into the ground for revenge and to set themselves up at the feeding trough for years to come.

Most Thais I know find this distasteful and are not in the least fooled by this as they all know the real reason (which we cannot discuss).

It seems in Thailand they seek to fool all of the people ALL of the time

Most Thais I know wonder why Ms. Yingluck failed to address the issue of a 'self-financing' scheme losing 700 billion Baht. They find it definitely distasteful and are not in the least fooled by a smooth talking woman.

The real reason which we can discuss is Ms. Yingluck and her government failing to address the growing problems with their 'self-financing' scheme, kept on defending it. They even included themselves in the blanket amnesty bill (covering till 2012-08-09). That's not the type of remedy one would like to see.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the TV broadcast, they used the word 'suspect'. They don't even have evidences that she's corrupted. There is nothing for her to address. At that point in time, her administration believed it was the right decision to buy the rice from the farmers. End of story.

ztbg

Irrelevant. They insert the word 'suspect' to avoid a charge of libel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If the members of the NLA would like to perform their role in putting the country back on the right track, the impeachment of a wrongdoer would show the supremacy of the law", Warong stated.

as this particular NLA has been hand-picked by the 'NCPO' which overturned the last government through, let's say, errr, ... less than legal methods, then it begs the question, "who's law?"

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rewriting my posts personal insults?

That's what we free thinking posters on here are use to yellow dem supporters.

Can't win won't win so just try and censor other posters or insult them.

That is the trait of a loser who is out of ammo!

Why do TV members get so aggressive with each other over their differing opinions ? Opinions is all they are, with no direct effect on the results of anything.

It's all a game, being played out as it has been for decades. Thailand will never benefit from any of it, the little people will definitely not benefit, the only people that will are those playing the game.

So for a longer, happier life, free from cardiac arrests, don't stress about what other people post :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...