JDGRUEN Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 Nethanyahu's Big Win .... With 95 percent of the votes officially tallied, Likud has won 29 seats in the Knesset, with Zionist Union gaining only 24. Likud thus emerges strengthened. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/415570/how-much-does-netanyahus-big-win-really-matter-mario-loyola 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rambling Posted March 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 18, 2015 (edited) An interesting point was raised today by one of the writers of the Haaretz paper. Apparently this is the first time in Israel's history that it's possible to create a purely right wing government, without any left/center parties needed for the coalition to reach majority. This is kind of scary from a demographics and the future of Israel point of view and also for realizing that there will be no checks and balances on this government. Another point to consider is that now there will be no way for Bibi and his allies to blame the left for anything (and everything), a common practice whenever something doesn't go right.. "oh we wanted to do this and that and the left interfered and prevented us.." So this is now going to be an interesting experiment in total control by Israel's right wing. Edited March 18, 2015 by rambling 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgal Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 (edited) I bet Hamas are thrilled. Hamas actually wanted Netanyahu to win! they need an excuse to carry on firing rockets into Israel when they want. For Hamas, the issue is less complicated. For its leadership, the nightmare scenario is a Herzog-Livni victory and the progress of peace talks with Abbas. Read more: Hamas and Fatah have clear, opposite interests in Israel's election outcome | The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/hamas-and-fatah-have-clear-opposite-interests-in-israels-election-outcome/#ixzz3UjHTMcNN The Netanyahu polici is already working without +61 majority in the Knesset.Do we need to be surprised from your Israeli tabloid ? Why is Israel playing constantly the victim role ? Hamas has nothing to do with the Israeli elections. Well you don't have to follow this topic if you don't like what you read! I guess in your eyes it is only Israel that has an agenda. Why would Hamas be interested in the elections. Maybe it has something to do with the missery they have brought apon Gaza, Maybe if the zionist Union had won Hamas' support base would weeken. No one said they had anything to do with the Israeli elections. But the certainly have an interest in who won! Perhaps a resume what should be the priority list (agenda) of Netanyahu and his future coalition.https://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/seven-existential-threats/ You can add the diplomatic relationship improvements with Obama, Abbas and other leaders elsewhere. I'm not convinced that he has a real peace plan for his future governement. Strange that he didn't tackle the funny issue of the German yerida's... I hope he can improve these issues with his hard core nationalist and religious 'right wing' coalition instead of blaming Hamas. The Palestinian issue cannot be his muse for his political and economical agenda. Edited March 18, 2015 by Thorgal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggold Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 This is such an exageration, how is Netanyahu going to start WW3, even the Rissians don't want Iran getting the bomb. There is more chance of WW3 over the Ukraine, than there is over Iran being bombed to destroy their nuclear ambitions. Huh ? It is not an exaggeration at all. Obama has got more than 18 months left in office and if Obama either signs an executive order regarding an Iran deal (or refers the matter to the United Nations which I think is better) Netanyahu has said many times Isael can take on Iran alone at anytime if they choose. You don’t have to be particularly brilliant at "joining the dots " to see how that would spark off world War 3 provide one link where it even suggests Israels action over Iran would spark WW3. Of course he cant provide a meaningful link. Since such a thing is impossible to prove or refute. Really is that the best answer? you can't provide a link because the idea just doesn't float. After all if it were true it would be very easy to prove. Only falsehoods are impossible to prove. How can he/she prove or refute that WWIII will become a reality if X attacks Y? He/she cant. Its not mathematics. It really is very simple, he/she has made a claim, no suggestion that it is only an opinion. I asked for a link to prove his claim. he cannot provide a reputable link because not even Obama has suggested it would start WW3 to try and turn it into some sort of isoteric question with "if X attacks Y" is nonsense, even that is quantifiable, I am sure Israel has worked out all the X's and Y's even a dimwit can understand that surely? Its not quantifiable. Maybe this link will help you with quatifying the probability! http://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Probability Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 (edited) What Bibi could possibly gain by going for a unity government even though with the strength of his victory now being clear, he really doesn't NEED to: http://forward.com/articles/216914/what-will-netanyahu-victory-mean-for-american-isra/ The main advantage for Netanyahu in this arrangement would be having Herzog, Livni and the entire Zionist Union faction serve as his shield against international pressure, or some would say as a fig leaf which would make him accepted in international circles. A unity government would require Netanyahu to walk back his statement regarding the Palestinian state and to return to the formula that kept him afloat in the past years – supporting a two state solution while making clear the time is not ripe for it. I have no idea what he will choose, but if he chooses to go all right wing, given what he said in the election, it seems to me he will be under pressure to have a real alternative plan and to try to sell it, if NOT a two state solution, then what exactly does he have in mind going forward regarding the Palestinian issue? Edited March 18, 2015 by Jingthing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BKKBobby Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 (edited) What Bibi could possibly gain by going for a unity government even though with the strength of his victory now being clear, he really doesn't NEED to: http://forward.com/articles/216914/what-will-netanyahu-victory-mean-for-american-isra/ The main advantage for Netanyahu in this arrangement would be having Herzog, Livni and the entire Zionist Union faction serve as his shield against international pressure, or some would say as a fig leaf which would make him accepted in international circles. A unity government would require Netanyahu to walk back his statement regarding the Palestinian state and to return to the formula that kept him afloat in the past years – supporting a two state solution while making clear the time is not ripe for it. I have no idea what he will choose, but if he chooses to go all right wing, given what he said in the election, it seems to me he will be under pressure to have a real alternative plan and to try to sell it, if NOT a two state solution, then what exactly does he have in mind going forward regarding the Palestinian issue? The world will remember his statement until he retires as a PM and see it for what is: a fig leaf. As said in your news quote. If he chooses that route of course. Edited March 18, 2015 by BKKBobby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Xircal Posted March 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 18, 2015 I don't agree with some of his policies such as expanding Jewish settlements in the occupied areas, but I admire him for attending the Paris show of unity by world leaders who attended the demonstration after the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack. The US could only muster up the US Ambassador with Obama citing the lack of notice to organise security on time as the reason for not going. Yet Netanyahu showed no sign of using the same excuse and can be clearly seen in the front row of diplomats even though he would be a prime target for a terrorist attack. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JDGRUEN Posted March 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 18, 2015 (edited) Israel voters ignore Obama’s campaign team and re-elect Bibi http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/70513 Edited March 18, 2015 by JDGRUEN 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JDGRUEN Posted March 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 18, 2015 (edited) POLITICO Bibi wins big http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/bibi-bounces-back-116167.html Edited March 18, 2015 by JDGRUEN 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgal Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 Israel voters ignore Obama’s campaign team and re-elect Bibi http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/70513 They will meet eachother, just before Den Hague... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 What Bibi could possibly gain by going for a unity government even though with the strength of his victory now being clear, he really doesn't NEED to: http://forward.com/articles/216914/what-will-netanyahu-victory-mean-for-american-isra/ The main advantage for Netanyahu in this arrangement would be having Herzog, Livni and the entire Zionist Union faction serve as his shield against international pressure, or some would say as a fig leaf which would make him accepted in international circles. A unity government would require Netanyahu to walk back his statement regarding the Palestinian state and to return to the formula that kept him afloat in the past years – supporting a two state solution while making clear the time is not ripe for it. I have no idea what he will choose, but if he chooses to go all right wing, given what he said in the election, it seems to me he will be under pressure to have a real alternative plan and to try to sell it, if NOT a two state solution, then what exactly does he have in mind going forward regarding the Palestinian issue? The world will remember his statement until he retires as a PM and see it for what is: a fig leaf. As said in your news quote. If he chooses that route of course. I agree. Unless he actually changes course and does something, rather than the status quo. I think it would be more interesting if he doesn't include the left at all and then see whether he can make a proposal that makes sense for the long term that doesn't involve two states and doesn't involve endless periodic wars. I'd like to hear that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Wat dee Posted March 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 18, 2015 No idea why Obama got pushed into this thread. Voting and public debate in Israel had nothing to do with Obama, no one cared or talked about him in the context of these elections. He's also responsible for global warming,Titanic and for the half the team in the NFL lost this week! Also...Obama was born 1961. 1+9+6+1=17. You know who used to be 17 years old?? HITLER!!! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarpoFongness4U Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 More back to the topic. Bibi has done something "interesting" in this election. Made relations with the U.S. more of a partisan issue in the U.S. Come out of the closet about his lack of intention regarding two state solution. Astute observers already knew that but it's significant he has said so explicitly. The Arabs going out to vote fear baiting comment by Bibi was very impolitic and racist but it's little different than when U.S. republicans try to suppress voting rights of minorities with crafty laws though no president is going to explicitly talk about that. It was clearly politically motivated ... to put fire under the tushes of the Israeli right wing to get out and vote for him, and vote for him they did, so from a purely campaign tactic POV it worked, but was it worth it what it even more openly shows the world about the Israeli right wing? The truth is the Arab coalition in this election which included votes from left wing Jews was historic and something refreshing for the future of Israeli democracy. Third highest vote getting party. That's a big deal. I wouldn't rule out a coalition with Zionist Union just yet. Forming a coalition lets Bibi walk back some of these extreme right wing words and actions he resorted to in the heated campaign. Maybe he doesn't want to walk them back. I'm not so sure. Herzogs party is dead. Livni, unwanted The Arab party is not about governing, but infiltrating Likud is the top vote getter for a reason No one wants another Arab state Not even the Arabs anymore They now need to focus on their own survival as crude oil is headed for $15/a barrel 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarpoFongness4U Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 Netanyahu's insatiable ambition forced him to reveal the truth about Israel's true intentions regarding the proposed two state solution. The one thing I would say to the Israeli voters is that elections have consequences. Against free election many are afraid to let Israel choose their leader. I say let Israel choose their leader as well Nigeria Egypt Syria Iran and the rest However maybe not the Germans because they did election and devil about 80 years ago The Washington Post, The New York Times and Obama all lost But the People of Israel had their right to vote Thank God Hitler was not voted in. He forced his way in with riots and demonstrations which forced the aging chancellor to grant him shared authority and then the chancellor died, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NeverSure Posted March 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 18, 2015 I agree. Unless he actually changes course and does something, rather than the status quo. I think it would be more interesting if he doesn't include the left at all and then see whether he can make a proposal that makes sense for the long term that doesn't involve two states and doesn't involve endless periodic wars. I'd like to hear that! JT, There is nothing that "doesn't involve periodic wars" including a two state solution. You aren't naive enough to think that these islamic terrorists will be satisfied with that? This is where Obama is failing. He believes he can negotiate with terrorists and terrorist sponsors when they won't be satisfied until they take everything. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ScarpoFongness4U Posted March 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 18, 2015 The Palestinian Authority hasn't held a vote since Bill Clinton was in office thus Arafat's successor is acting as President against their own election rules Hamas would win which is why there is no vote Israel voters understand that the new party run by Kahanu or w/e his name is, will become finance minister and begin to push for more construction to ease Israeli housing shortages brought on by US policy of not allowing building The election sends a clear message to Obama and the US congress, Do the right thing with Iran, or you will wake up one morning to find its burning Iran doesn't have a second strike capability, and the US is not going to do Anything other than finish the job the IAF starts, assuming they even bother to use aircraft. Bibi won, the Obama state dept. Lost and Vladimir Putin is more likely to visit Israel before Obama The us has no teeth in the middle East anymore and the foreign policy of Ariel Sharon is in full view of the world as Iran and Hezbollah are being stretched to weakness 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NeverSure Posted March 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 18, 2015 The us has no teeth in the middle East anymore and the foreign policy of Ariel Sharon is in full view of the world as Iran and Hezbollah are being stretched to weakness Obama has no teeth. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 I agree. Unless he actually changes course and does something, rather than the status quo. I think it would be more interesting if he doesn't include the left at all and then see whether he can make a proposal that makes sense for the long term that doesn't involve two states and doesn't involve endless periodic wars. I'd like to hear that! JT, There is nothing that "doesn't involve periodic wars" including a two state solution. You aren't naive enough to think that these islamic terrorists will be satisfied with that? This is where Obama is failing. He believes he can negotiate with terrorists and terrorist sponsors when they won't be satisfied until they take everything. No, I am not naive. But I think Bibi has created a trap for himself with his big reveal. and he has an escape option by joining a coalition with Zionist Union. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Exsexyman Posted March 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 18, 2015 What is interesting is that all the talk is about Iran, not Islamic State. Even though Iran is fighting Islamic State. I thought that Islamic State are the big threat? Poster after poster on here falling over themselves to call them "Scumbags", etc etc. Also interesting that just about the only nation that have not been targeted by Islamic State is Israel. Strange that! I wonder why that could be? Lets face it, Islamic State didn't just appear from thin air a couple of years ago. The far right in the US and Israel won't be the only ones celebrating Bibi's victory, that's for sure. For anyone with an open mind, just a few minutes of research will reveal their origins. Nothing is ever what the perceived wisdom would have you believe! For the warmongers who are desperate to attack Iran, despite all the evidence from experts, nuclear watchdogs, even Mossad and the CIA that give the lie to Netanyahu's constant lies since 1992 that Iran are "Three years away" from having nuclear weapon capability, the ends justify the means. God help us all. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NeverSure Posted March 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 18, 2015 JT, There is nothing that "doesn't involve periodic wars" including a two state solution. You aren't naive enough to think that these islamic terrorists will be satisfied with that? This is where Obama is failing. He believes he can negotiate with terrorists and terrorist sponsors when they won't be satisfied until they take everything. No, I am not naive. But I think Bibi has created a trap for himself with his big reveal. and he has an escape option by joining a coalition with Zionist Union. His option now is that he can ignore any wimpy deal the UN makes and defend his country. His people saw that. His people didn't opt for better relations with Obama which they wouldn't have gotten anyway (Obama hates Israel), and they didn't make the economy and high housing prices the priority. Normally with high inflation, a weak economy and housing shortages with high prices, a leader would get voted out. James Carville in talking about Clinton's first win said the famous "It's the economy, stupid." The voters in Israel are more concerned about defending the country and they don't need the US to do it. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JDGRUEN Posted March 19, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted March 19, 2015 What a coincidence that the NY Times attitude towards Nethanyahu reflects that of the leftist U.S. President. After Harsh Editorial, Watchdog Group Says New York Times Has Anti-Netanyahu Obsession“Anyone who wasn’t already aware of The New York Times mindset just has to read today’s paper on Israel’s elections to realize how pervasive is the anti-Netanyahu obsession at that newspaper,” said Senior Media Analyst Ricki Hollander of CAMERA. http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/03/18/after-harsh-editorial-watchdog-group-says-new-york-times-has-anti-netanyahu-obsession/ 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 A post with messed up quotes has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notmyself Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 One thing we can be certain of is that Bibi does not want peace, at any cost. The world is getting sick of endless boy who cried wolf anti-Semitic claims so perhaps this crazy fella being re-elected could turn out for the better. At least he has been honest in that he acknowledges that everything he has said previously has been a lie. Go **** ******* Israel. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarpoFongness4U Posted March 20, 2015 Share Posted March 20, 2015 The us has no teeth in the middle East anymore and the foreign policy of Ariel Sharon is in full view of the world as Iran and Hezbollah are being stretched to weakness Obama has no teeth. Obama is greatly under estimated The us wanted the Arabs to do their own fighting, now they are... Israel has never been safer and Obama works for the same bosses as does Netanyahu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted March 20, 2015 Share Posted March 20, 2015 The BDS movement is going to strengthen now. Israel still has a rough path to navigate. Most countries are very certain they will exist in 20 years time. Israel doesn't have that luxury. Sure there are security concerns but increased isolation could also be a security concern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted March 20, 2015 Share Posted March 20, 2015 With the election over and other similar topics running, I will close this one. Here is one: http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/809985-netanyahu-win-dashes-prospect-for-a-thaw-with-obama/ //CLOSED// Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts