LannaGuy Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 (edited) Where are the junta huggers with their " they should be in class studying and not protesting" holier than thou crowd? Hypocrites indeed, no need to name, they know who they are. Not a single copper or soldier enforcing the law because they're from the right kind of people eh? There was a golden opportunity to show the Junta was impartial ( 5555) and have these protestors arrested for breaking the same law as the wrong kind of group. Farcical and obvious that even Steve Wonder can see what's going on. Reconciliation? 55555 The plus point is that now the Junta have turned a blind eye to this group, it's given the other the green light to do the same and not be arrested again right ? Neither side should protest don't like things to escalate again. But fair is fair what side started it the protests ? Your right though that these guys should have been told to disperse too. Your right though that these guys should have been told to disperse too I disagree. Only 'political' gathering of more than five are banned. Large groups attend temple services, sports events, etc. with no problems. Since the Junta are non-political, support for them is non-political. As far as Fat Haggis' comments, if the Junta allows Democrat Party supporters to rally, that would prove his case. As things stand now, he is grasping at straws... as usual. . it's a political gathering in FAVOUR of the junta that's why you 'disagree' hypocrite if they are 'non-political' why are demos AGAINST them not allowed? hypocrite Edited July 14, 2015 by LannaGuy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayboy Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Where are the junta huggers with their " they should be in class studying and not protesting" holier than thou crowd? Hypocrites indeed, no need to name, they know who they are. Not a single copper or soldier enforcing the law because they're from the right kind of people eh? There was a golden opportunity to show the Junta was impartial ( 5555) and have these protestors arrested for breaking the same law as the wrong kind of group. Farcical and obvious that even Steve Wonder can see what's going on. Reconciliation? 55555 The plus point is that now the Junta have turned a blind eye to this group, it's given the other the green light to do the same and not be arrested again right ? Neither side should protest don't like things to escalate again. But fair is fair what side started it the protests ? Your right though that these guys should have been told to disperse too. Your right though that these guys should have been told to disperse too I disagree. Only 'political' gathering of more than five are banned. Large groups attend temple services, sports events, etc. with no problems. Since the Junta are non-political, support for them is non-political. As far as Fat Haggis' comments, if the Junta allows Democrat Party supporters to rally, that would prove his case. As things stand now, he is grasping at straws... as usual. . He thinks the Junta is non political.Store that fact away since that is all you need to know about the output from this person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rametindallas Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Where are the junta huggers with their " they should be in class studying and not protesting" holier than thou crowd? Hypocrites indeed, no need to name, they know who they are. Not a single copper or soldier enforcing the law because they're from the right kind of people eh? There was a golden opportunity to show the Junta was impartial ( 5555) and have these protestors arrested for breaking the same law as the wrong kind of group. Farcical and obvious that even Steve Wonder can see what's going on. Reconciliation? 55555 The plus point is that now the Junta have turned a blind eye to this group, it's given the other the green light to do the same and not be arrested again right ? Neither side should protest don't like things to escalate again. But fair is fair what side started it the protests ? Your right though that these guys should have been told to disperse too. Your right though that these guys should have been told to disperse too I disagree. Only 'political' gathering of more than five are banned. Large groups attend temple services, sports events, etc. with no problems. Since the Junta are non-political, support for them is non-political. As far as Fat Haggis' comments, if the Junta allows Democrat Party supporters to rally, that would prove his case. As things stand now, he is grasping at straws... as usual. . it's a political gathering in FAVOUR of the junta that's why you 'disagree' hypocrite if they are 'non-political' why are demos AGAINST them not allowed? hypocrite The demonstration by the 14 students was political because they invited the media and were challenging the law, specifically, and also the authorities to arrest them. They even refused bail that was offered. There were also some 50 or supporters in front of the jail who were not arrested/molested because they were there to support the students and not challenge the government; there is a difference but I know you can't/won't see it. Supporting the non-political government is not political and the vocational students weren't challenging any authority or law as the purpose of their gathering. . These students were being used by their professors to foment an uprising against the government. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NongKhaiKid Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Hard to believe a group of vocational students were together without a fight starting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 (edited) Hard to believe a group of vocational students were together without a fight starting. Strangely enough the majority of vocational students are law abiding and want to get on in life which is the same as uni students, senior schools etc. However as with every grouping there are small groups who don't want to play nice, don't want to be normal, that want to be a problem, and THEY are the ones causing the problems for all the other vocational students. It is the same as saying that all farang teachers are paedophiles. They are not but they get tarred by the same generalisation? It is like saying that every farang living in Pattaya spends all their time in bars with bar girls and they are all ex special forces. Totally untrue but that is what has been said. Edited July 14, 2015 by billd766 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemac Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 For what it's worth, the way I see it is the reason the Military did not arrest these vocational students is the same reason the redshirts were allowed to carry on unhindered by the PTP - they are on the same side ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NongKhaiKid Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Hard to believe a group of vocational students were together without a fight starting. Strangely enough the majority of vocational students are law abiding and want to get on in life which is the same as uni students, senior schools etc. However as with every grouping there are small groups who don't want to play nice, don't want to be normal, that want to be a problem, and THEY are the ones causing the problems for all the other vocational students. It is the same as saying that all farang teachers are paedophiles. They are not but they get tarred by the same generalisation.7 It is like saying that every farang living in Pattaya spends all their time in bars with bar girls and they are all ex special forces. Totally untrue but that is what has been said. Are you not too good with tongue in cheek remarks ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Hard to believe a group of vocational students were together without a fight starting. Strangely enough the majority of vocational students are law abiding and want to get on in life which is the same as uni students, senior schools etc. However as with every grouping there are small groups who don't want to play nice, don't want to be normal, that want to be a problem, and THEY are the ones causing the problems for all the other vocational students. It is the same as saying that all farang teachers are paedophiles. They are not but they get tarred by the same generalisation.7 It is like saying that every farang living in Pattaya spends all their time in bars with bar girls and they are all ex special forces. Totally untrue but that is what has been said. Are you not too good with tongue in cheek remarks ? Not today for some reason. It is past time for my afternoon nap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NongKhaiKid Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Hard to believe a group of vocational students were together without a fight starting. Strangely enough the majority of vocational students are law abiding and want to get on in life which is the same as uni students, senior schools etc. However as with every grouping there are small groups who don't want to play nice, don't want to be normal, that want to be a problem, and THEY are the ones causing the problems for all the other vocational students. It is the same as saying that all farang teachers are paedophiles. They are not but they get tarred by the same generalisation.7 It is like saying that every farang living in Pattaya spends all their time in bars with bar girls and they are all ex special forces. Totally untrue but that is what has been said. Are you not too good with tongue in cheek remarks ? Not today for some reason. It is past time for my afternoon nap. With you all the way on that one ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LannaGuy Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 The demonstration by the 14 students was political because they invited the media and were challenging the law, specifically, and also the authorities to arrest them. They even refused bail that was offered. There were also some 50 or supporters in front of the jail who were not arrested/molested because they were there to support the students and not challenge the government; there is a difference but I know you can't/won't see it. Supporting the non-political government is not political and the vocational students weren't challenging any authority or law as the purpose of their gathering. . Where are the million of people.jpg These students were being used by their professors to foment an uprising against the government. . ah that's a convenient interpretation isn't it demo FOR government is NON-political demo AGAINST government IS political nice logic that... nice 'Junta Spin' 'don't do as I do, do as I say' demos FOR ok demos AGAINST lock them up and don't forget the current GOVERNMENT is non-political Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupatria Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Okay...since this is a political course and it is a gathering of more than 5 people and the law is the law...why are they not all in jail? Djjamie? Costas? Anyone? When the khon kaen students were arrested you guys all screamed about unfair, inappropriate, they are just students, etc., and demanded they be released. Now you want a group of students to be arrested. Just which way to you want it? Any chance you may consider that this is a matter of "equal rights/laws for all"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Where are the junta huggers with their " they should be in class studying and not protesting" holier than thou crowd? Hypocrites indeed, no need to name, they know who they are. Not a single copper or soldier enforcing the law because they're from the right kind of people eh? There was a golden opportunity to show the Junta was impartial ( 5555) and have these protestors arrested for breaking the same law as the wrong kind of group. Farcical and obvious that even Steve Wonder can see what's going on. Reconciliation? 55555 The plus point is that now the Junta have turned a blind eye to this group, it's given the other the green light to do the same and not be arrested again right ? Neither side should protest don't like things to escalate again. But fair is fair what side started it the protests ? Your right though that these guys should have been told to disperse too. Your right though that these guys should have been told to disperse too I disagree. Only 'political' gathering of more than five are banned. Large groups attend temple services, sports events, etc. with no problems. Since the Junta are non-political, support for them is non-political. As far as Fat Haggis' comments, if the Junta allows Democrat Party supporters to rally, that would prove his case. As things stand now, he is grasping at straws... as usual. . it's a political gathering in FAVOUR of the junta that's why you 'disagree' hypocrite if they are 'non-political' why are demos AGAINST them not allowed? hypocrite The demonstration by the 14 students was political because they invited the media and were challenging the law, specifically, and also the authorities to arrest them. They even refused bail that was offered. There were also some 50 or supporters in front of the jail who were not arrested/molested because they were there to support the students and not challenge the government; there is a difference but I know you can't/won't see it. Supporting the non-political government is not political and the vocational students weren't challenging any authority or law as the purpose of their gathering. . Where are the million of people.jpg These students were being used by their professors to foment an uprising against the government. . If you look at the definition of political in any dictionary, it starts with something like: "Of, relating to, or dealing with the structure or affairs of government, politics, or the state: a political system"(the free dictionary) So it is political. The junta not being composed of professional politicians doesn't mean it's not political.And we all know on which side they are..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DM07 Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 RametinDallas: "These students were being used by their professors to foment an uprising against the government." Care to provide some prove? "Since the Junta are non-political, support for them is non-political." This sentence totally discredits you as a serious discussion- partner. One of the Junta is the PM- how much more "political" can it get?! I am not even interested to see, how you weasel yourself out of this mess! Pathetic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now