Jump to content

Police 'no closer to solving Erawan case'


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

BANGKOK BLAST
Police 'no closer to solving Erawan case'
THE NATION

30267711-01_big.png?1440799410909

BANGKOK: -- AFTER questioning some 200 witnesses over the August 17 Erawan Shrine bombing, police investigators are still unable to rule out any of the possible motives, a senior police officer said yesterday.

Metropolitan Police Bureau commissioner Lt-General Sriwara Rangsiprammanakul said the witnesses questioned included those who sustained injuries in the explosion as well as passers-by.

He said police had yet to come to a conclusion on the motive of the bombing, which killed 20 people and injured more than 100 others, or whether it could be connected to the bomb that was dropped into the water on August 18 at the Sathorn Pier.

Police have issued an arrest warrant for an unnamed Asian-looking suspect who was captured on security cameras dropping a bag containing the explosive device into the water at the pier. Nobody was hurt in that explosion. The suspect captured on camera looks 25 to 30 years old and about 170 centimetres tall, as per the warrant issued on Thursday night.

Earlier, a separate arrest warrant was issued for a foreign-looking man suspected of planting the bomb at the Erawan Shrine.

People have come up with a few possible motives for the bomb attack, including political conflict, business disputes and terrorism.

A police source said yesterday that a taxi driver who took the alleged bomber to Hua Lamphong train station gave conflicting statements on exactly where he picked up the suspect.

The source said both police and military officers had interrogated the cab driver. The driver had previously said he picked up the suspect from a building on Rama IV Road, but later changed the location to somewhere on Rama III Road.

Deputy national police chief Lt-General Prawut Thavornsiri, however, said yesterday that he did not think the cabbie was lying, adding that it was possible he did not fully remember all events that took place because it happened many days ago. "We need to allow the witness to go over all the details carefully again," he said.

Meanwhile, national police chief General Somyot Poompanmuang said Sa Kaew Immigration Police had questioned Uighur men they had arrested for illegal entry over the deadly bombing.

Sa Kaew Immigration Police also said yesterday that none of the Uighur men who allegedly escaped from detention in late April looked like the Ratchaprasong suspect.

Pol Colonel Benjapol Rodsawas, deputy commander of Sa Kaew Immigration Police, said they had compared images and saw the three men "looked different" from surveillance-video images of the Erawan bomb suspect. He dismissed earlier reports linking the three escapees to the bombing.

Somyot also slammed unnamed foreign media for linking the bombing to terrorists or religious groups, saying such speculation could adversely affect international ties. He pointed out that police had yet to conclude the motive of the attack or decide who should be held responsible.

In a related development, Army chief General Udomdej Sitabutr said yesterday that investigation into both explosions had seen much progress, though he added that the authorities had to be careful about coming up with a conclusion.

"We have to sympathise with the authorities. Information needs to be dealt with carefully or there could be damage to the country," said Udomdej, who is also deputy defence minister.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Police-no-closer-to-solving-Erawan-case-30267711.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-08-29

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so sickened by this constant "could be damage to the country " bullsh1yte. How about a little honesty, such as, we don't know who did it , why they did it or how to resovle it!

Followed by an appeal for international assistance, that IMHO, would do more to restore credibility to the country. But in reality that will never happen, "face" etc and perhaps there is no real desire to solve the case at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so sickened by this constant "could be damage to the country " bullsh1yte. How about a little honesty, such as, we don't know who did it , why they did it or how to resovle it!

Followed by an appeal for international assistance, that IMHO, would do more to restore credibility to the country. But in reality that will never happen, "face" etc and perhaps there is no real desire to solve the case at all.

There have been media reports Thai authorities have been liaising with foreign intelligence agencies and enlisted the support of Interpol, so why are you making the claim in your second paragraph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so sickened by this constant "could be damage to the country " bullsh1yte. How about a little honesty, such as, we don't know who did it , why they did it or how to resovle it!

Followed by an appeal for international assistance, that IMHO, would do more to restore credibility to the country. But in reality that will never happen, "face" etc and perhaps there is no real desire to solve the case at all.

There have been media reports Thai authorities have been liaising with foreign intelligence agencies and enlisted the support of Interpol, so why are you making the claim in your second paragraph

There are also many many reports from other countries that they have either offered help or "not been asked", these countries include (but not exclusively) the UK, US and Indonesia. As for Interpol, they have been given a photofit image and an arrest warrent for an un-named person.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am still a little puzzled.

How do you get an arrest warrant for an unnamed person?

I was under the deluded impression that you need to identify the person to be arrested as part of the process of applying for the warrant as it is the first step in the legal process of prosecution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting article in today's ABC news about investigative reporters discovering CCTV footage of what could be the suspect moving away from Lumpini Park after the bombing. Taken on CCTV in a local hospital. It would appear that police didn'tn bother to check, they certainly knew about them as according to one interviewed 'the cameras were regularky checked during the red/yellow troubles'

Perhaps if the police spent less time looking for posters of girl's nipples and on far more serious matters they just might make more progress.

The article also states the police have refused offers of assistance from foreigh agencies. Don't know whether this is true or not but I wouldn"t be surprised. Link....http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-28/unseen-security-footage-underscores-patchy-bangkok-blast-probe/6734234

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking to a police inspector friend of mine (not Thai) he said in Asia a lot of attacks of this nature are often carried out by police or military for nothing more than obtaining a bigger budget for their department! Sounds crazy I know, but if true, GOD HELP US ALL.....

Edited by chappie1207
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What they do know is that the bomb was a pipe bomb. Do you remember the case in Nonthaburi (2010??) when someone's house exploded and it turned out that the house was occupied by red shirts trying to assemble a bomb. These were pipe bombs, similar, I understand, in design to the one at the Shrine. Happened again in 2014 when two red shirts blasted themselves to death when the pipe bomb they were handling exploded. This may be a dubious connection, but to my mind there is sufficient circumstantial evidence to link the Erawan Shrine explosion to supporters of the exiled dictator. I wonder if the RTP have tried to forensically connect these three incidents?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it isn't Miss Scarlet in the Library with a dagger ...but ..Mr Mustard in the Shrine with a pipe ...it would seem funny ..but for the tragedy and loss for the families of those 20 murdered ..with little hope of a resolution..my heart goes out to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What they do know is that the bomb was a pipe bomb. Do you remember the case in Nonthaburi (2010??) when someone's house exploded and it turned out that the house was occupied by red shirts trying to assemble a bomb. These were pipe bombs, similar, I understand, in design to the one at the Shrine. Happened again in 2014 when two red shirts blasted themselves to death when the pipe bomb they were handling exploded. This may be a dubious connection, but to my mind there is sufficient circumstantial evidence to link the Erawan Shrine explosion to supporters of the exiled dictator. I wonder if the RTP have tried to forensically connect these three incidents?

I just did a search and found this - http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Woman-held-for-2010-Nonthaburi-blast-linked-to-Min-30232357.html

Maybe the RTP have short memories...let them keep looking for their 'asian looking foreigner"....they will never catch the real culprits.

More here: http://altthainews.blogspot.com/2015/08/bangkok-blast-confronting-wests-pundit.html

Edited by DavisH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it isn't Miss Scarlet in the Library with a dagger ...but ..Mr Mustard in the Shrine with a pipe ...it would seem funny ..but for the tragedy and loss for the families of those 20 murdered ..with little hope of a resolution..my heart goes out to them.

I totally agree, I feel for those whom lost their lives.... Make it headlines, and then it will go away..... Next?clap2.gifclap2.gifclap2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so sickened by this constant "could be damage to the country " bullsh1yte. How about a little honesty, such as, we don't know who did it , why they did it or how to resovle it!

Followed by an appeal for international assistance, that IMHO, would do more to restore credibility to the country. But in reality that will never happen, "face" etc and perhaps there is no real desire to solve the case at all.

To your last sentence, he is very clear in his quote that he is waiting for the police to decide who is responsible, not solve the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am still a little puzzled.

How do you get an arrest warrant for an unnamed person?

I was under the deluded impression that you need to identify the person to be arrested as part of the process of applying for the warrant as it is the first step in the legal process of prosecution.

Even worse than that : it seems that when you know exactly who you want to arrest, you have to go through the same process.

And, of course, announce that you are doing it to the press to give the guy ample warning. It's so ridiculous, it's insane.

The more I see what goes on here, the more obvious it is that the rules have been written by people who want to be sure they have a 'get out' should their own crimes be found out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What they do know is that the bomb was a pipe bomb. Do you remember the case in Nonthaburi (2010??) when someone's house exploded and it turned out that the house was occupied by red shirts trying to assemble a bomb. These were pipe bombs, similar, I understand, in design to the one at the Shrine. Happened again in 2014 when two red shirts blasted themselves to death when the pipe bomb they were handling exploded. This may be a dubious connection, but to my mind there is sufficient circumstantial evidence to link the Erawan Shrine explosion to supporters of the exiled dictator. I wonder if the RTP have tried to forensically connect these three incidents?

Good post.

You make some interesting points.

The more time goes by, the more difficult it will be to solve this case unless some unexpected break comes up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the government/police doesn't have high tech equipment to help find the bomber(s) but won't allow another country to help in the investigation. Guess it could be because of a loss of face or fear of having those responsible found out. If it really is incompetence, the terrorists may take comfort in knowing they are safe and continue with the heinous acts. Also, why would anyone come forward with information when they may be accused of being in cahoots with the bombers by authorities looking for a scapegoat. It's all a bad joke.

Edited by 1duckyboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trail is cold now but still the FBI, Mossad, CIA, Scotland Yard could be of help.

Yes ,Scotland Yard were so good at solving the Yorkshire ripper case !!! Only took them about 2 years while the ripper continued to bait them and kill other women .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Information needs to be dealt with carefully or there could be damage to the country," said Udomdej

The country was already damaged... by a bomb!

Udomdej is Army Chief and Deputy Defence Minister - does that mean he orders himself around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree with the police that solving this case requires a lot more time than they're being allowed - like 10 to 15 years!

That should be enough time for the public to forget about the failure of the police to find the perpetrators.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know the Thai police are doing what they can, but the initial refusal for outside investigatory assistance was a mistake in the extreme. The FBI has scientific and forensic tools that the Thais can't even conceive of. They should have been allowed in immediately - after all, a terror bombing is an assault on all countries, not just Thai pride.
But, in a rush to create a facade of normalcy, the crime scene was purged of any evidence as quickly as possible, and the murderers got away.
(another thought; why are backpacks and luggage allowed on the BTS?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...