Wilsonandson Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 Another find. http://blog.livedoor.jp/zamamidam/archives/51004942.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob13 Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 what are they gonna do with all that junk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilsonandson Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 No doubt about it. You found a Japanese H2A rocket fairing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobotie Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 (edited) Interesting, in light that immediately after the plane "disappeared" there were witnesses on gas rigs in the Gulf of Thailand that claimed to have witnessed a plane exploding and crashing at exactly the same time as contact was lost. This was way before the search shifted to the Indian ocean.The Oil Rigs in the Gulf of Thailand, are only 120 - 250 +, miles from shore. The plane would have needed to crash, no more then 50 miles from the furthest rig to be seen( if it did explode) if it ran out of fuel then would be minimum fire. Sorry, sell your idea to the Coconut web site. Are you the same guy that said the Malaysian plane is being stored at Area 51, in the USA??Fact is the report of the alleged siting came from an oil rig the south china sea off vietnam, not the gulf of Thailand, but of course we shouldnt let geography get in the way of a good conspiracy theory... Edited January 24, 2016 by Bobotie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puccini Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 Well seeing that the part no's are all over U tube speculation should end in days if these are boeing parts no's the plot will thicken and the rig workeres theory may be correct. Then if true all the other great rocket scientists who said it is down by the southern end of Aus will have egg on face. What is part no's? What is end of Aus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocketman777 Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 Very unlikely given the distance and other land masses between the current search area and likely position of the downed plane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puccini Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 (edited) Well seeing that the part no's are all over U tube speculation should end in days if these are boeing parts no's the plot will thicken and the rig workeres theory may be correct. Then if true all the other great rocket scientists who said it is down by the southern end of Aus will have egg on face. What is U tube? What is part no's? Edited January 24, 2016 by Puccini Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob13 Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 youtube part numbers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puccini Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 youtube part numbers Thanks. They didn't teach that in English classes in Italy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kcirtapyelrah Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 It's been 2 years and I'm still waiting for a decent explanation on how you lose a jumbo jet It's on Diego Garcia, nothing can fly over the Indian ocean without the Americans knowing, that's why their there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfredthegreat Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 It's part of the fairing from a Japanese HII-A rocket. HIIA.jpg That does look the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAMHERE Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 It is of no significance unless the people are pointing at it. I thought it was guilt is not assigned until fingers are pointed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBWG Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 Just more trash! Thailand hub of ................ http://www.pri.org/stories/2016-01-13/5-countries-dump-more-plastic-oceans-rest-world-combined Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonsalviz Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 It is not an airliner part. Bolt heads sticking out in the breeze is a no no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulianLS Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 It is not an airliner part. Bolt heads sticking out in the breeze is a no no. How can you tell, are we not looking at the underside???? I would put most of my money on Air Asia wreckage (as per two previous posts, the most likely source imho), a bit on Japanese rocket (a fun outside bet), and nothing on MH370 wreckage! (Oh, and by the way, it looks nothing like the flaperon than rocked up at Reunion, at least, not to the trained eye). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunPer Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 Perhaps from AirAsia Flight 8501, Airbus A320, 28 December 2014 in Java Sea...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywais Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 The location of the debris in Thailand "would appear to be inconsistent with the drift models that appeared when MH370's flaperon was discovered in Reunion last July," said Greg Waldron, Asia Managing Editor at Flightglobal, an industry publication. "The markings, engineering, and tooling apparent in this debris strongly suggest that it is aerospace related," said Waldron. "It will need to be carefully examined, however, to determine it's exact origin." Other possible sources of aerospace debris included the launching of space rockets by India eastwards over the Bay of Bengal, he said. Full article here - Reuters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stargeezr Posted January 24, 2016 Share Posted January 24, 2016 I am wondering if the numbers on this piece of material will help identity just what it is from. Until the right people have examined it and let the rest of us know, it is all speculation right now. I do hope that some day the wreckage of MH370 is located, and the families can have closure of where their family members and loved ones were lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba Posted January 25, 2016 Share Posted January 25, 2016 That other newspaper is stating in their story this morning: "Thai aviation experts who had inspected the plane wreckage confirmed Sunday serial numbers found on its bolt parts belong to the Boeing 777 model." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dick turpin Posted January 25, 2016 Share Posted January 25, 2016 That other newspaper is stating in their story this morning: "Thai aviation experts who had inspected the plane wreckage confirmed Sunday serial numbers found on its bolt parts belong to the Boeing 777 model." Thai aviation experts........give me a break Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_Dog Posted January 25, 2016 Share Posted January 25, 2016 Agreed it is Japanese rocket fairing. I don't think Hexcell aluminum core is used anywhere in a -777 anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob13 Posted January 25, 2016 Share Posted January 25, 2016 From USA Today: Thailand's The Nation, however, reported that the serial number found on the debris indicated it belonged to a Boeing 777, the same model as MH370, but that it was unclear whether it is the same aircraft http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/01/24/debris-could-linked-doomed-malaysia-flight/79267544 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mca Posted January 25, 2016 Share Posted January 25, 2016 (edited) It's an under cowling from a reverse cross rammed bloater...... It's quite apparent you know nothing about aeronautical design Nick. With my in depth knowledge attained from building Airfix Spitfires as a child and once living 20 mlies from Heathrow Airport it's quite obviously the cowling covering a flange inducer responsible for stabilising the in flight endoscope and hydraulic barometric conflagration and not a reverse cross rammed bloated as you naively suggested. Edited January 25, 2016 by mca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MockingJay Posted January 25, 2016 Share Posted January 25, 2016 It's an under cowling from a reverse cross rammed bloater...... It's quite apparent you know nothing about aeronautical design Nick. With my in depth knowledge attained from building Airfix Spitfires as a child and once living 20 mlies from Heathrow Airport it's quite obviously the cowling covering a flange inducer responsible for stabilising the in flight endoscope and hydraulic barometric conflagration and not a reverse cross rammed bloated as you naively suggested. Don't forget to mention, that the white/red cable seen on the pictures definitely connects to an underhinged supersonic ramshaft infiltrator, short USRI, one of the most essential parts to control the flange inducer's low flow ratio, which never should drop under 0.62 cc/sec. The RCRB, Nick mentioned, sits further down, near the the superconducted hacktrembler which - on the other hand - is responsible for the air-sensitive gust impeller's RPM coordination but definitely not the harprider torque assembly of the RCRB Nick mentioned earlier. Hence I see little evidence that this is a part of the Malaysian Airlines machine... sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandyf Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Actually may be part of the Thai navy's first sub? More likely from a ufo that flew by from the Orion constellation. How sure are you that it was from Orion? Unlikely, none have crashed around here but it wouldn't be out of the question for the Thai Navy to have lost a panel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now