Jump to content

Malaysian PM cleared of wrongdoing in $700 million scandal


webfact

Recommended Posts

Malaysian PM cleared of wrongdoing in $700 million scandal
EILEEN NG, Associated Press

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) — Malaysia's attorney general said Tuesday that nearly $700 million channeled into Prime Minister Najib Razak's private accounts was a personal donation from Saudi Arabia's royal family, and cleared him of any criminal wrongdoing.

The announcement by Attorney General Mohamed Apandi Ali capped months of uncertainty for Najib, who has been fighting intense pressure to resign over the financial scandal in his biggest political crisis since he took power in 2009.

Najib welcomed Apandi's decision. "He has confirmed what I have maintained all along: that no crime was committed," Najib said in a statement.

Questions remained, however, about the donation. Apandi did not say why the Saudi royals made the donation or what the money was to be used for.

He said an investigation by the country's anti-corruption agency showed no criminal offence had been committed because the $681 million transferred into Najib's accounts between March and April 2013 was "given without any consideration" by the Saudi royal family as a personal donation.

"I am satisfied that there is no evidence to show that the donation was a form of gratification given corruptly," Apandi said.

He said Najib returned $620 million to the Saudi royal family in August 2013 as the money wasn't utilized. He did not elaborate and did not say what happened to the remaining $61 million.

The anti-corruption agency met with witnesses including the donor, he said.

Apandi said no reason was given for the donation, which was a matter between Najib and the Saudi royals.

Najib, however, indicated that it was for political funding.

"I appreciate that political funding is a topic of concern to many people," he said in his statement. He said he planned to submit political funding reform proposals for discussion.

Najib called the controversy an "unnecessary distraction" for the country and said it was time to unite and move on.

"I will now redouble my focus on the key issues that matter to Malaysia, especially combating the threat of terrorism, and strengthening the economy in the face of global headwinds," he said?.

Najib has been grappling with deep unhappiness over his leadership, with large street rallies in August calling for his resignation after documents leaked in July suggested that about $700 million was deposited in his private bank accounts from entities linked to indebted state investment fund 1MDB.

Najib denied any wrongdoing and later said the money was a donation from the Middle East. Since then, he has replaced critics in his government with loyalists, sacked the previous attorney general who had been investigating him, and cracked down on the media.

Saudi government officials in Riyadh had no immediate comment about the investigation. It was not mentioned on the state-run Saudi Press Agency early Tuesday.

Opposition lawmaker Tony Pua slammed Apandi's decision, saying the fact that it was a personal donation did not rule out corruption.

Pua said Apandi provided no new or convincing information to support his decision.

The scandal started with investigations into 1MDB, which was set up in 2009 by Najib to develop new industries but it amassed 42 billion ringgit ($9.8 billion) in debt. Critics have long voiced concern over its massive debt and lack of transparency. Najib still chairs its advisory board.

The political scandal contributed to the Malaysian currency plunging to a 17-year low last August.

Apandi also cleared Najib of graft at government-owned SRC International, a firm linked to 1MDB, over another 42 million ringgit ($9.8 million) from SRC that was deposited into Najib's account between December 2014 and February 2015.

He said there was no evidence to show Najib was aware of the money transfer, or that he had given his approval. Apandi said Najib had thought that all payments made from his accounts came from the donation by the Saudi royal family. No further details were available.

Support for Najib's ruling coalition has eroded in the last two general elections. It won in 2013, but lost the popular vote for the first time to an opposition alliance.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2016-01-27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems he is holding the post of Prime Minister but is drawing a higher pay from another employer, of another country...

Malaysians boleh!!!

He should be hung not for corruption, but for treason...

Edited by trogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a joke he is personally given 700 million , not corrupt what are the saudis getting in return.

Seems a bit odd that a royalist family would pay out 687 mill (which is a lovely number) for 0 return. As if a family of this standing would just deposit, as a 'donation' of this sum to a foreign bank account for no benefit, then being sworn to secrecy. Further more how much haas Apandi been grossly paid off to move this in a direction of silence? The term proven is relative, as Najib is still chairing his own parties/personal benefits. Corruption is endemic and breeds mediocrity. 'Unite and move on' what convenience, under a dictatorship ruling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malaysia's attorney general said Tuesday that nearly $700 million channeled into Prime Minister Najib Razak's private accounts was a personal donation from Saudi Arabia's royal family, and cleared him of any criminal wrongdoing.

Malaysia's attorney general received a personal donation of $xxx into his account on Wednesday from the PM and said that he was satisfied that the donation in no way constituted a payment for services rendered as it was a totally private and personal kind of a thing. That's all folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could not make this stuff up. Fired the previous Attorney General and put in "his" man and voila: No crime committed. Does not explain where the other $61 million went. Couldn't the Attorney General determine this. Not that difficult to trace how it went in then out of bank accounts, I would think. On top of the money from the Saudis he gets the $9.8 million from the SRC put in his personal accounts and there is nothing to look at here. Geez, what does it take to see corruption in this man. One can only hope the people get wise and elect another party to govern the next election and then they really go after this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could not make this stuff up. Fired the previous Attorney General and put in "his" man and voila: No crime committed. Does not explain where the other $61 million went. Couldn't the Attorney General determine this. Not that difficult to trace how it went in then out of bank accounts, I would think. On top of the money from the Saudis he gets the $9.8 million from the SRC put in his personal accounts and there is nothing to look at here. Geez, what does it take to see corruption in this man. One can only hope the people get wise and elect another party to govern the next election and then they really go after this guy.

This is what happens when the foxes are guarding the hen house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why the public sit idle and allow this kind of government to exist. They really must be like sheep. If so they deserve what they get. Most other societies would revolt over such an enormous scandal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why the public sit idle and allow this kind of government to exist. They really must be like sheep. If so they deserve what they get. Most other societies would revolt over such an enormous scandal.

They have no choice, do not know and/or the consequences of inciting/creating issues of those in such powerful positions would be extremely detrimental to themselves and families health. Those that cleared the Malay PM are all in his pocket too; 700 mill means there is a lot to go around, and is estimated prior to the movement in currency accounts, as end balance agreement including expenses. Truth be-known he's probably 'only' getting 550-600, the rest is all expense funds to keep those in awkward positions silenced.

Corruption fella...............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""