Jump to content

Foreigner seen beating young child after dispute over 10-baht fee


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
7 minutes ago, Farang hunter said:

So he is a Muzlim and Arabian, what we got here.   A terrorist?

No need to get racist. The premise that it was a kid and about a 10 baht fee  has been long debunked.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Old Croc said:

No need to get racist. The premise that it was a kid and about a 10 baht fee  has been long debunked.

Why do you think I am being racist!?

The four young men who stole the lady's bag in the shopping mall  much in here hinted that they were Muslims and I was saying they were from eastern europe and it turned out that they are Israelis.   So I don't want to speculate the nationality of the victimizer  but to see him face the consequences of his bizarre behavior. 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Farang hunter said:

Why do you think I am being racist!?

The four young men who stole the lady's bag in the shopping mall  much in here hinted that they were Muslims and I was saying they were from eastern europe and it turned out that they are Israelis.   So I don't want to speculate the nationality of the victimizer  but to see him face the consequences of his bizarre behavior. 

 

But you did speculate, asking if he was Arab or Muslim?....  

 

To elaborate on the 'Catch Up' comment...  you have fallen behind the news and still comment on a '10 year old' being attacked... It turns out that this story is false, it turns out that the 'boy' who was attacked is in fact a '20 year old man'.... 

 

This changes things slightly...   but still raises the question: Why would one guy want to attack another guy in such a manner? What was the trigger ?

 

People on this forum have speculated that they guy 'could' have taken photos of the girls while they used the bathroom... whether this is true or not remains unclear, however, if something like this occurred the attitudes of many who have responded so far would change very quickly.... 

 

The outstanding question is WHY ? what caused the guy to become so angry ?

 

Edited by richard_smith237
Posted
50 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

To elaborate on the 'Catch Up' comment...  you have fallen behind the news and still comment on a '10 year old' being attacked... It turns out that this story is false, it turns out that the 'boy' who was attacked is in fact a '20 year old man'.... 

No way that boy was 20 years old.

Posted
5 hours ago, BangkokNicky said:

Well gone by now ... Plus looks like a Australian on the cctv ..

'Looks like an australian'????

Is that because he looks healthy and fit unlike the average westerner?

Oh and because in your esteemed opinion the perp may be from Oz then the whole disgusting episode should be forgotten?

No wonder the rest of the world is bewildered by the use of the word 'great' before Britain.

Land of Dopes and Tories

Posted
1 hour ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

But you did speculate, asking if he was Arab or Muslim?....  

 

To elaborate on the 'Catch Up' comment...  you have fallen behind the news and still comment on a '10 year old' being attacked... It turns out that this story is false, it turns out that the 'boy' who was attacked is in fact a '20 year old man'.... 

 

This changes things slightly...   but still raises the question: Why would one guy want to attack another guy in such a manner? What was the trigger ?

 

People on this forum have speculated that they guy 'could' have taken photos of the girls while they used the bathroom... whether this is true or not remains unclear, however, if something like this occurred the attitudes of many who have responded so far would change very quickly.... 

 

The outstanding question is WHY ? what caused the guy to become so angry ?

 

Maybe  because he is an expat and believes has a right to insult and assault locals.

Not an uncommon rationale for many...disgusting as it is.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Farang hunter said:

Why do you think I am being racist!?

The four young men who stole the lady's bag in the shopping mall  much in here hinted that they were Muslims and I was saying they were from eastern europe and it turned out that they are Israelis.   So I don't want to speculate the nationality of the victimizer  but to see him face the consequences of his bizarre behavior. 

Of course you are not interested in nationality?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Fulwell53 said:

Of course you are not interested in nationality?

Why would I be interested but when you God forbids get carried away with chatters here it is not good.:hit-the-fan:

Posted
 
But you did speculate, asking if he was Arab or Muslim?....  
 
To elaborate on the 'Catch Up' comment...  you have fallen behind the news and still comment on a '10 year old' being attacked... It turns out that this story is false, it turns out that the 'boy' who was attacked is in fact a '20 year old man'.... 
 
This changes things slightly...   but still raises the question: Why would one guy want to attack another guy in such a manner? What was the trigger ?
 
People on this forum have speculated that they guy 'could' have taken photos of the girls while they used the bathroom... whether this is true or not remains unclear, however, if something like this occurred the attitudes of many who have responded so far would change very quickly.... 
 
The outstanding question is WHY ? what caused the guy to become so angry ?
 


Boy was taking photos of girls in toilet then going through them. One girl spotted it and came back with farang to confront him. He hide phone and the rest is on Cctv.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

Posted
5 hours ago, Thechook said:

Looks Australian, really?  Aussies are made up of people from every country on the planet so he could be from anywhere.  European in appearance could be from Europe also.  Not wearing footy shorts, singlet and thongs 

No bone through the nose and no didgeridoo - so obviously not a real Aussie.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Xaos said:

 


Boy was taking photos of girls in toilet then going through them. One girl spotted it and came back with farang to confront him. He hide phone and the rest is on Cctv.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
 

correct  .....   this is what happened and that why she brought the farang back ....

now,  not that it's ok what the kid did ....  but it's not worth getting into a big argument over and possibly shot .... TIT ...and anything can happen.

He should have followed it up with the boys supervisor or someone around with authority ...

Posted
6 hours ago, jaiyen said:

How do you know its an Aussie ??   More likely a Pommie <deleted> !

 

He's applying and showing the same intelligence as you.

Posted
3 hours ago, Xaos said:

 


Boy was taking photos of girls in toilet then going through them. One girl spotted it and came back with farang to confront him. He hide phone and the rest is on Cctv.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
 

 

 

Is that actually fact... because already on this thread one person has alluded the the fact that he gave the very same theory, which was then picked up by coconuts news, the poster in question was then approached by coconuts who never let facts get in the way of a good story..... 

 

So... Is this something you know, from a reliable source (not coconuts) or just hearsay from this forum ????

Posted

This gets ever more interesting.

 

It not only transpires the 'kid' was twenty, but the 'foreign' FB poster was his old man. And this was not the first time a customer had 'refused' to pay the fee, nor obviously the first time the 'kid' had picked up a knife, as the weapon apparently was. 

 

Simply over B10?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Jonmarleesco said:

This gets ever more interesting.

 

It not only transpires the 'kid' was twenty, but the 'foreign' FB poster was his old man. And this was not the first time a customer had 'refused' to pay the fee, nor obviously the first time the 'kid' had picked up a knife, as the weapon apparently was. 

 

Simply over B10?

Nope- according to several news sources (as opposed to the Thaigeezer Poirots) the 'boy (20)' was allegedly a Peeper and was caught taking pictures of women in the can.

 

Her boyfriend took umbrage when he should have called the police- not that they would have done much.

 

Three or 4 punches is hardly a beat down but still wrong.

Edited by Psimbo
Posted (edited)

All the Thai press so far are reporting that it was a dispute over the 10 Baht toilet charge and make no mention of the 'covert filming of the girls in the toilet' accusation.
However, there are several Thai comments on the Youtube clip that do mention the real cause was the boy Abdullah secretly filming the girls in the toilet and the farang took revenge when he found out.
Thai Manager online reported more on the story 3 hours ago. The 10 year-old 'boy', Abdullah Saeseha, is in fact 20 years-old.
Investigating officer Police Lieutenant Colonel Somsak Thongkhliang from Patong police station said the assailant was a 34 year old American ('Chris' - assumed name) who had sought treatment at Patong hospital after the attack. He had then departed Thailand from Phuket airport on 4th May, the day after the attack.
Somsak continued that no complaint had been made to the police from Adullah or his familly and details of the attack had initially come to light after the clip was posted to Facebook by Tohee Seesa (Abdullah's father) on the 3rd May offering a 5000 Baht reward for information about the identity of the assailant.
Police said if Abdullah wishes to file a compliant he should come to Patong Police station and do so.

At the time of going to press, Thai Manager online had tried to contact Tohee Seesa via the two telephone contact numbers left in his Facebook post, but the calls remained unanswered.

Edited by katana
Posted
On 5/16/2017 at 7:34 PM, richard_smith237 said:

I'm left wondering what the 'kicker' was, what triggered him to snap like that. 

Probably drugs , not in control of his mind , or just a lunatic. 

 

Posted

Shoe is on the other foot for a change. About time some senseless violence is going the other way.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, katana said:

All the Thai press so far are reporting that it was a dispute over the 10 Baht toilet charge and make no mention of the 'covert filming of the girls in the toilet' accusation.
However, there are several Thai comments on the Youtube clip that do mention the real cause was the boy Abdullah secretly filming the girls in the toilet and the farang took revenge when he found out.
Thai Manager online reported more on the story 3 hours ago. The 10 year-old 'boy', Abdullah Saeseha, is in fact 20 years-old.
Investigating officer Police Lieutenant Colonel Somsak Thongkhliang from Patong police station said the assailant was a 34 year old American ('Chris' - assumed name) who had sought treatment at Patong hospital after the attack. He had then departed Thailand from Phuket airport on 4th May, the day after the attack.
Somsak continued that no complaint had been made to the police from Adullah or his familly and details of the attack had initially come to light after the clip was posted to Facebook by Tohee Seesa (Abdullah's father) on the 3rd May offering a 5000 Baht reward for information about the identity of the assailant.
Police said if Abdullah wishes to file a compliant he should come to Patong Police station and do so.

At the time of going to press, Thai Manager online had tried to contact Tohee Seesa via the two telephone contact numbers left in his Facebook post, but the calls remained unanswered.

 

Seems the boy made a connection with the knife.

Posted

Yes, some of the footage shows them fighting outside the shop afterwards where it could have happened.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...