OneMoreFarang

I just think the idea to believe every woman without any evidence is hilarious, especially if she claims to remember what happened 30 years ago and if she makes millions of dollars from this. I thought that at least most guys in Thailand know that it is not a good idea to believe everything they say. My buffalo is sick and all that.

Tell us about the 19th century. It seems you support nepotism in 2023...

2010 - never forget!

Did you consider that they hate Thaksin for a reason? Or maybe hundreds of reasons. I know few people who lived here when Thaksin was PM who don't hate him. And about tourism: It would be great if there wouldn't be so many of them.

Thanks! So I am not alone here with my experience with that family. I hope they will all die in the desert.

"I understand - you prefer 20 yo airheads. Each to his own." I love those personal attacks for no reason. Thanks for showing your attitude. The question was about his DNA on her dress. That would prove that he was near her. I.e. maybe she gave him a BJ. It doesn't prove if she liked it or not. And if his semen or DNA was inside her that still wouldn't prove he raped her. Did you ever leave DNA in any woman or maybe man? Did you rape that person? I never raped a woman. If a woman would accuse me of raping her then I would be angry at her for such outrageous accusation. I am sure I would say I didn't do it. In private I also might say that she is ugly and old and the last person who I would want to have sex with. Now let's get back to Trump. He is a well known as#%$%4 who is known to talk aggressive about anybody who is not on his side. Trump is like that for a long time. I don't like him and many people don't like him. I am sure he told many women that they are ugly. Is that nice? No. But is it prove that he raped them. No. It is just typical Trump behavior and no prove at all that he raped that woman.

He and her didn't have to do what "they" wanted. And they had many, many years to return.

I always thought people say "god did it" if they have no explanation. ????

If you ask me now where I was i.e. at 14:37 on the 7th March 2017, then I am able to tell you. Not because I have such a great memory, but because Google saves the GPS records from my Android phone since years. In their timeline it is easy to check where my phone was, which 99% of the time means where I was. That technology didn't exist 30 years ago for normal users. Most people at that time didn't have big and expensive mobile phones. And even if they had I am pretty sure those phones had no GPS sensors included. There is no information about the locations of each of us from that time.

If you take that argument then now every women who lived in NY can come forward and say that serial liar raped her and we should believe all of them because he is a serial liar, correct?

His DNA on her dress would be a start. But that also wouldn't prove that he raped her. Those women who now say she told them "shortly after the rape/assault", do they have any dates when she told them. If person A tells person B and C at time unknown that something happened, is that prove that it happened? No! It's just information that A told something to B and C. It's independent of whatever she said. No prove at all. And about a "50 year old attractive looking woman". There are 50 year old women who look not bad considering their age. There are no sexy and good looking 50 year old women - even if they try as hard as Madonna.

In DOS times, before Windows 3 was launched in 1990, everybody who worked on a PC used NC. It was probably the most used utility at that time.

There is a big shop in Fortune 4th floor where they repair things like that. It is in the middle of the floor and impossible to miss. Unfortunately I forgot the name of the shop. In Fortune are also smaller audio shops. I am sure some of them can repair this or recommend someone who can.

I used NC a lot - with DOS. It was a great program at that time.

You could try to look them up. Instead you just pretend that you know that he is innocent because somehow he must be innocent, correct? Maybe just look up some facts for a few minutes - that is in case you are interested in the truth.

Yes. And sometimes they are actually guilty.

Sure, maybe your fixes work. Good for you. I work full time on PCs since DOS and Windows 3. And I had to fix many PCs where wannabe experts thought they fixed them previously. Most private PCs have way too many optimization programs installed. Professionals don't install 99% of those programs, because they are not necessary. Keep it simple!

There are also too many guys who think they know about PCs, but they know little. And most of the people with half knowledge make the situation worse. It's like asking the neighbor to fix the brakes on the car. The neighbor said he can do it. What can possibly go wrong? ...

I am sometimes surprised that some rich and famous people are found guilty. And sometimes I am surprised that they are found innocent. Thaksin had more than enough time to show lots of evidence for lots of cases that he is innocent. He didn't. And lots of evidence exist that he is guilty in multiple cases. He ran away and we can't change that in the hindsight. And he didn't show up in court. Should we now pretend nothing ever happened and he is innocent? Is that the signal which we want to give all politicians: Run away and later all is forgiven. Sure not!

If anybody saw or heard what actually happened, and when it happened, then I am sure I would have read about it already. Nobody saw or heard this accused rape happening. That's the whole point. There is no evidence. That doesn't prove it didn't happen. But there is also no prove that it happened.

Nobody needs any of these. And installation with too many useless programs is not getting better by installing more (more or less) useless programs. The first advice should be: Remove any programs which were installed and which you don't need. But I guess that instruction is already too difficult for the OP.

Bring your PC to an expert and let the expert fix it. Warning: Not everybody who knows 20% more than you is an expert. And installing xyz or following instructions from people you don't know, or some video is a bad idea.

As usual Thaksin talks a lot and then he is a coward. He never had to leave Thailand. He could have returned any day since (I think) 17 years. He could have shown up in court and he could have explained to us why he is innocent. He didn't. He knows he is guilty. And he knows he will be arrested on arrival. This is why he just talks and doesn't come back.

12 witnesses? What did they see or hear on which day? She doesn't even remember when she thinks he did it. Does any or the witnesses have a day and time for whatever they witnessed?

You can make a survey how many guys would be interested in sex with a teenage girl (16 is legal in Thailand) and how many would prefer an old woman. He certainly is a serial liar. But that doesn't make him guilty in this case.