candide

It's Trump who made that ridiculous claim, not me. That was his own choice! Promise made, promise broken! 😆

Actually, it's broader than China vs USA, it's also about open source vs commercial AI. The open source ai community is quite dynamic and it's an additional contribution which will be improved not only by China, but also by other AI open source participants. The choice of open source by the Chinese has two advantages: - as you pointed out, it allows them to benefit from previous open source knowledge and resources, - it directs a share of AI open source innovation by other actors towards complementary innovation which will help China to cope with current limitations regarding chips and other resources.

Ridiculous! Trump was lying about water not being g available! 😆

Luckily, for Trump, he was able to bring down the price of other food items immediately! Oh wait!

Promise made, promise kept! https://tradingeconomics.com/ https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/1/22/2298447/-Egg-prices-skyrocket-and-Trump-appears-not-to-give-a-cluck

Read my post. I never claimed there is no tax evasion, just that the double sandwich is over.

It may not really need it now, but for how long? The question is not whether China will dominate or not. The only relevant question is when? There will be a time when the USA will not be able to really compete alone with China and to really hinder its influence.

Well, they lost the right to send them back as they left the EU

That's $280 billion. Not bad. Let's see when (if) this is actually offered.....

That's smart from the Chinese to make it open source. By doing so they will be able to use freely any additional improvement made by anyone in the world. In the end the total amount of development resources dedicated to it may well exceed what is expected to be invested in ChatGPT and other LLM models.

Promised made, promised kept! The price of food fell immediately after Trump was sworn in! And Russia and Ukraine signed a case fire even before Trump officially became President!

Keep up to date. There is no double Irish Dutch sandwhich any more. The EU has forbidden it in 2015 and Ireland had to change its laws. Apple also has to pay back 5 years worth of taxes.

The local government already rejected it.

There is no law forbidding U.S. investment in Greenland and Denmark. No need to invade it. Actually, Greenland and the U.S. have been cooperating for 20 years and U.S. investment is welcomed. It's just that no many investors have shown interest in Greenland so far, apart from mining companies. https://dk.usembassy.gov/u-s-greenland-joint-committee-statement-october-25-2024/ Same on the military aspect. Greenland is part of NATO and there is already a U.S. base, and as far as I know, Greenland and Denmark have not rejected any offer to create more bases.

Thank you for your interest in Greenland. We appreciate the time and effort you invested in applying for acquiring it. After careful consideration, we have decided not to move forward with your application at this time. We appreciate the strengths you demonstrated and if a suitable opportunity opens up in the future, we would be happy to hear from you and consider your application again. If you have any feedback for us about our application process, we welcome your input as it helps us learn and improve! We sincerely appreciate your interest in Greenland and wish you all the best in your acquisitions search. Best regards 😆

Greenland and Denmark are NATO members. I wonder how article 5 works when a NATO country invades another NATO member. 🙂

Actually, it's not easy to find precise and recent information about the U.S.. In particular about IP rights. It seems Apple pays taxes on revenues in the U.S for sales in the U.S. However, it"s not clear about intellectual property rights. (Apple may or may not pay its Irish subsidiary for IP rights used in the U.S.) it's more precise about the EU because of recent investigations and decisions

As you seem to be unable to find which people/functions are in charge of security at the Capitol, I will help you! 😆 Where is it written that the House speaker (whoever that may be), is in charge of security at the Capitol? Nowhere! Oversight: the Capitol Police Board https://www.uscp.gov/the-department/oversight Leadership: the Chief of Police Quote: The Chief reports directly to the Capitol Police Board https://www.uscp.gov/about/leadership

Blah blah! You have nothing, as expected! 😆

And it's not like GOP committees wouldn't show a successful track record about when they already investigated Biden. You know like the 2019 GOP Senate investigation, and the "Comer said" House investigation! Oh wait, 😆

So still no proof of these made up claims from the MAGA alternate universe? That's what I thought! 😆 Poor MAGAs

So no text stating that the House speaker is in charge of security. That's what I thought! 😆 https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-235651652542 Did she claim she was in charge of security at the Capitol?

Lame distraction.

Baseless lies direct from the MAGA alternate universe. 😆 Fact is that Trump did not call the National Guard after the assault on the Capitol. Fact is also that he did not ask his supporters to go out of the Capitol ASAP. BTW, show us the official text stating that Pelosi, as House speaker, was in charge of security at the Capitol. You won't because you are just parroting The propaganda sent to you. 🙂

Did they assault the Capitol in an attempt to steal elections?