BangkokReady

Or it's because that is how things are done in Thailand and they are happy with it? If they're happy and it works for them, who are you to judge? They should change how they do things and be less happy in life so they are labelled a "simp"? To be honest, to get this bothered by what someone else does (and you seem very bothered - I count five insults), that has zero effect on you, it suggests you're likely jealous of what they have.

Very often it seems that the Thai woman is kind of the mom, with the Thai man being the child. The women are kind of "in charge" in the relationship, but they're also responsible for a lot.

While it's monumental for this to all go public, what will be really good to see, is the people that facilitated all of this see some jail-time.

You can't just shut your eyes and wish yourself into being a different country. TAT seem to think that all they need to do is put up prices, say that they're targeting high quality tourists, and they will magically appear. One of the biggest problems is how they treat foreigners. Rich people, who can afford to go anywhere, won't be spending big bucks to go somewhere where there is any danger of a local (be it civilian or some sort of authority) giving them a load of hassle and getting away with it, and there's a lot of that in the press. Rich people want to know that they're going to be treated very well, if they're going to spend a lot of money. Probably better than the locals. Nobody wants to shell out on an expensive holiday only to be looked down upon and possibly abused or exploited. Sure, "it's their country and they can do what they want" is always true, but they then have to live with the consequences.

It's a troll account, so of course this is a troll. That's why the questions are so loaded. It's garbage.

It's probably just that, while she might seem attractive, she has little long term potential, as she's so busy with her own stuff going on. These type of women aren't looking for a stay at home partner, but the men in her league are. "I started out as a woman men want to date, and made myself undatable."

It's like George sat there and thought, "What can I say to humiliate myself and support her point completely?" The problem is, the loony left are so convinced that they are the good guys, they don't stop to think for a second before doing or saying awful things.

What has JK Rowling ever said that is bigoted? Do you have an example? She's literally just said, "No male bodies in female spaces". That's it. She's completely woke in everything apart from this one point, and that made her a Nazi social outcast for the loony left. It's utter madness.

George started the deflection. Rowling brought it right back on topic, humiliating George in the process. You couldn't be more wrong.

I can't believe you let something so trivial bother you so much. You must have such a negative point of view. And then you come and whinge about it here!

Yup. Social distancing, masks, hand sanitiser, lock down everything, for the rest of time. It's the only way. 🤦‍♂️

You sure it's not locals buying the homes?

An oddly racist comment. Why does it matter that they are also old and White? Is young Black males doing it OK to you?

Sounds more like a Dem pushed over the edge.

Nope. Just following the evidence.

He was Dem affiliated. Apparently one victim is considered to have voted out of line with the party. There were "no kings" flyers found in his car. Plus there is already an established pattern of left-wing violence. It seems pretty unlikely that the guy is right-wing.

Any evidence that he's right wing? Everything so far says that he is left wing.

Could be going after perceived "traitor Dems" who voted in a way he disagreed with.

Sure. They need due process. Simply round them up at the protests (all the people dressed on black carrying shields), then investigate and put on trial if links to the domestic terrorist organisation called antifa can be proven.

Trump's political/ideological enemies doing bad things is not evidence of Trump being bad. Not sure why that seems so hard for some to understand. Most likely they/you are simply being dishonest.

Seems like he might be left-wing actually.

These are the facts. If you don't like those facts, there isn't much you can do.

Well, the left said "We want to trans your kids, we want male bodies in the private spaces of women and girls, and we want unlimited ideological access to your children", all under the guise of helping children. The right then said, "No". I think most would agree that the right has had a fairly mild response, given what the left wants. So, no. Youre wrong. Not central, and certainly less than the left. So you're wrong again. Are you suggesting that the loony left's obsession with targeting children is hiding a desire to abuse those children?

He knows he's messed up and he's finding it hard to backtrack. He knows the left are generally the "moral crusaders", and that there are more perverts on the left than on the right. I wonder if he regrets starting this thread, as it's made him look even more stupid and dishonest than usual.

What an odd choice of lies to tell. Clearly the left are far more often styled as the "good guys" and the "moral crusaders". The centre/right of centre are a lot more matter of fact. Do you think that people will just beleive whatever nonsense you spew onto your keyboard?