BangkokReady

Only because that happened to be what police suspected could have contributed to the likelihood of a breach of the peace if he approached the protestors. It still doesn't mean that he was arrested for being Jewish. Nor that the breach of the peace was for "being Jewish".

I answered your question. He could have been arrested if he wasn't Jewish if his actions still threatened a breach of the peace. A person doesn't have to be Jewish to be suspected of doing something that might breach the peace.

If his actions threatened a breach of the peace, of course.

Could no one else cause an issue with the group? What about a non-Jewish Israel supporter? Or an anti-Islamist? Surely, either of those could cause a breach of the peace and, therefore, be threatened with arrest?

The Jewish man wouldn't have been threatened with arrest to prevent a breach of the peace if his actions weren't deemed likely to cause a breach of the peace. That's true as far as I can see, but that doesn't make the reason for threat of arrest "being Jewish".

That still wouldn't make "being Jewish" the reason for the arrest.

No. He was threatened with arrest to prevent a breach of the peace because the officers believed that him approaching the protestors would cause a breach of the peace. There is no "because he was Jewish" in relation to wanting to prevent a breach of the peace.

Not quite. It also relates to the protestors.

No. The only legal way is "to prevent a breach of the peace". That's the legal part. The rest, whilst being somewhat relevant, doesn't constitute the reason for the arrest. There is no illegality being suggested about "being Jewish".

He was threatened with arrest to prevent a breach of the peace, not because he was Jewish.

Either way, that wasn't what he was threatened with arrest for. It was to prevent a breach of the peace.

I'm not taking anything out of context, and you're being more argumentative than I am. People are making the claim that the man was threatened with arrest for being Jewish. He wasn't. That's it.

Someone could have "scammed" you into paying to much for a service or buying something that was not quite what you were led to believe it was.

Let me explain. If you punched someone, you would be arrested for punching them. If you were arrested to prevent a breach of the peace, you would be arrested to prevent a breach of the peace. If the breach of the peace in question was likely to be caused by a Jewish person walking in front of a group of protestors, it still would not be a case of the person being arrested for being Jewish. But you're still not being arrested for being Jewish. It doesn't. At least not to me... 🙄

The man in the article was threated with arrest to prevent a breach of the peace.

How could you possibly know that you've never been scammed? What if someone scammed you but you never found out about it?

I'm simply pointing out what happened. Some people are saying something that didn't happen. I am saying what did happen.

He did not.

Why? That is what happened! "I will arrest you to prevent a breach of the peace" is very different from "I will arrest you for being Jewish".

Nobody has said that it is.

You're doing that, not me. No aloofness. Just honesty. 🤷‍♂️

That doesn't mean he was threatened with arrest for being Jewish. It's as simple as that. Clearly, I am not.

You're agreeing with me that he wasn't threatened with arrest for being Jewish?

Exactly, which means he wasn't threatened with arrest for being Jewish. I'm a little confused as you appear to say that you don't agree, then go on to say that you do... 🤔

It was awful and obviously fictional, based on the content. There were also a few tell-tale signs suggest it is AI.