DrJack54

Personally never have done it that way. Always entered my most recent entry date. Also my most recent 90 reports at CW I have filled in the TM47 that way and provided photocopy on current entry stamp. Along with couple of other photocopies. Granted my last report the io did not even look at my photocopies and just glanced at my pp. Also with mail option I do same and provide same photocopies. Have never provided TM30 for either. Seems in person now wants a TM30.

You don't need a visa run company if using Nong Khai crossing. Grab mini van from front of central Plaza.

Don't understand the question. TM47 is required if you stay in Thailand for 90 days. If you exit Thailand and subsequently return your entry date starts new count. Entry date day 1. Some folk suggesting to fill in online TM47 ignoring trips out of Thailand is silly idea in my thinking.

My answer from current similar threads..... "Immigration at airports in Thailand not thrilled with fly out/in same day. At most land borders its common practice to bounce same day Many folk use border bounce agents (recommended)"

Mail in reporting has previously been accepted in same way as in person reporting. The current issue with online reporting seems to be down to syncing TM30 with 90 day reporting. Currently in Saigon and when I return to Thailand, I have zero intention of doing a TM30. 75 days from date on entry I will do a 90 report via mail (unless I'm am exiting Thailand again) in under 90 days

You are doing all this to avoid in person reporting so to be able to do online reporting. Even to the point of putting incorrect information on the TM47 re last entry date. You could consider report via mail.

TM30 Never previously required for 90 reporting via mail. My comment is CW specific

OR you could do a TM47 75 days after reentering Thailand. I use mail option and have never included TM30. (CW)

Immigration at airports in Thailand not thrilled with fly out/in same day. At most land borders its common practice. Many folk use border bounce agents (recommended) If you post your location you will receive first hand reports. For example Pattaya to Cambodia

Further bickering posts will be removed

Which bar?

Thread trolling and somewhat offensive. Thread closed

Topic off track. Thread closed

Have you considered a METV. Provides 6+ month stay.

The requirement for a TM30 reentering Thailand after overseas trip is tied up to online reporting. Immigration wanting to sync TM30 with TM47. Suggest you do a 90 report via mail 75 days after return date. Personally had several trips out of Thailand..In fact Saigon tomorrow. If my next annual extension requires a TM30 (never previously 12 yrs at CW) then I will file one. Aside: if the in person was absolute after every overseas trip, then I would do no TM47 and pay 2000b at annual extension.

Yes

Which immigration office

You can enter Thailand with a non O or can enter visa exempt or tourist visa and obtain non O at immigration. In any event the first 12 month extension of your permission of stay would need to be based on what the non O was based on. The common example would be non O based on retirement and first extension based on retirement then changing to further extensions based on marriage

Off topic post removed

I was quoting a guy that specifically Refered to CW. Also the OP referenced CW. I have never seen an extension based on retirement at CW have a home visit..

The OP is not applying for an extension based on retirement. He is applying for a non O retirement from a visa exempt entry. Most likely will have an under consideration period. When he subsequently applies for 12 months extension it will be granted on the spot. Provided financial requirements etc are met

I'm not so sure. Assuming for current extension based on retirement he maintained the 800k for 3 months after last application and then not below 400k he could apply for the extension based on marriage with account showing 400k. Having stated that, I always suggest topping the account back up to 800k to cover all bases.

The OP later explained he has a non O and in title asks about extension of his permission of stay by 60 days. Indeed that is possible. Granted he referred to extending his visa. Incorrect terminology.. Not a big deal.

The OP could actually have a 90 day stamp from a non O and is asking about a first 12 month extension. Most likely he is already on extensions. If indeed it was his first extension he would have to do that based on retirement.

No problem. You would need to have met the financial requirements for retirement up till application for extension. Assume you are on annual extensions. You don't cancel your non O.. Your wife will need to attend