Lacessit

None of your links are official ATO responses to a query, referencing existing legislation. They are discussion/consultation papers only, without any ATO imprimatur. I don't expect you to see the difference, due to your obsession with them.

If it's money he can prove was in his savings prior to January 1, 2024, they can't touch it. Perhaps you could give your laugh emoticon a rest, and concentrate on your syntax. There's a missing preposition in your post.

My view : I am either an Australian resident for tax purposes, or I am not. I am either deemed to be resident in Thailand to be paying tax there, or I am not.

Marry a Thai, then you will pay about 5000 baht pa in taxes. Plenty of Thai volunteers. I once had one offer to live with me for 4000 baht/month. Mind you, no oil painting.

I expect the concept of residence and non-residence will have to be explained next.

I'm not bothering to read links you have posted multiple times - erroneously. Article 19 deals with pensions in Government service. Article 18 deals with Centrelink pensions and annuities. I don't know what it does in the case of superannuants. Article 19 only has relevance to Article 18 in respect of government pensions.

"Therefore, under the double tax agreement between Australia and Thailand, pensions, and annuities, ( other than pensions for government service ) are taxable only in the country of residence". I can be taxed in Australia if I am deemed to be resident there by the ATO. I can't be taxed in Australia if I am being taxed in Thailand. I can explain it to you, I can't understand it for you.

If you want to split hairs over the difference between the two types of papers, go ahead. Find me someone else on this thread who gives a sh!t about what you post now. You have lost all credibility, and obviously have the empathy of a scorpion. End of ride.

The non-resident tax brackets are irrelevant for anyone living in Thailand. You may be right, there may be no change to non-resident tax brackets. It's a non-issue now. Still refusing to admit you were WRONG, or apologizing. P!ss off.

I'd like to see Haley lock horns with Kamala Harris or Michelle Obama.

He's incontinent. Karma is a bitch sometimes.

I usually get stopped in the shopping malls by people collecting for charities such as orphans, deaf, blind or elephant farms. I donate money, but politely decline the goods they offer in return. There is a very old woman who I encounter occasionally, walking the road between my GF's village and her home village. Compared with her face, a prune is as smooth as a baby's bum. She goes between villages to help with funerals, for which she is paid in food. Every time I see her, I stop and give her 100 baht. She is delighted, every time. I can't understand a word she says. I suppose helping people who are less fortunate than me might be making merit, but I don't know.

You have done it perfectly, good one.

KH would have to be living under a rock to miss multiple pronouncements on the DTA status of non-residents by the ATO. Based on his current posts, I'm leaning to the second explanation. “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results

Particularly punctuation.

Well said.

My two favorites are "Tom Jones" and "Erin Brockovitch".

I would like to point out KH has made over 600 posts on this thread, virtually all of which have caused mental distress to readers of this thread. I have called him out repeatedly, and also reported him for repetitive posting. Joseph Goebbels: If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The fact he is back posting without admitting he was wrong, or apologizing to people for causing them distress, tells me everything I need to know about his character. You make a fair point. However, some things need to be said.

I do enjoy life. I just don't suffer fools gladly.

Unemployment less than 4%, GDP up after Trump gutted it in 2020. Stock market all-time high. The border problem is caused by Republicans blocking any initiatives, on Trump instructions. Trump doesn't have any advisers. He's a one-man band, way out of tune. You'd prefer the Trump solution for Ukraine? Walk away, and kiss Putin's @ss?

Am I correct in assuming the same instructions apply in criminal trials? Jack Smith seems to have plenty of exhibits to be admitted into evidence - documents at Mar-a-Lago, tape recordings, emails and posts by Trump himself. I am just wondering what physical exhibits the defense lawyers will be entering into evidence, and what witnesses they can call to contradict the testimony of prosecution witnesses. IMO any sworn testimony from a defense witness would be flirting with perjury. There may not be much agreement on facts, given Trump prefers alternative ones. After Trump refused to provide a DNA sample for the Carroll trial, it was clear he did not want that to be admitted into evidence. With his perfect memory, he would know if he raped her.

The silence from our usually voluble and prolific poster has been quite deafening over the last 48 hours. Karma really is a bitch, isn't it?

There is one on LAZADA for 50 baht, most stainless ones are 100 - 200 baht. i forget what i paid for my Besico, have had it for many years.

Disagree, at least Biden has competent advisers to support him. Trump only has toadies and yes-men.