Liverpool Lou

special Thai 'elite' pricing? ???? Special embellishment by the OP!

Don't flatter yourself. there's no way I'd ever feel that I'd need recognition from you in your life or in any other circumstances! It does appear, though, that you feel that you are of greater importance than reality bears out!

Those full on evening sessions just make my wrist ache in the morning.

What do his obscure posts have to do with telecommunications?

Well, if I do not yet represent the farangs who have been here for many years, and this is debatable, then, surely, someday I might. No, it is not debatable, at all. You do not, and you never will, represent Thailand's foreigners here.

experience tells "How do you know that this alleged case WAS ALL ABOUT MONEY???!!!!!" You had experience with this specific case that the OP is whinging about? How come?

What does that mean?

The full report clearly states that he's back in police custody.

A football analogy...brilliant. Got anything else that means nothing?

Me too. He got red carded anyway. What does that mean, "red carded", and by whom, someone with any significance? Does it mean, perhaps, that someone with a different opinion to mine didn't appreciate my being factual?!

Or how about...We can explain it to him, but can't understand it for him. Some posters (not you, of course) are unable to explain anything rationally!

So by your Thai apologetics tapdancing, you feel he should be allowed out on bail again? 555 You read it that way if it pleases you, but I did not give my opinion. which is irrelevant any way, I was commenting on the law that permitted him bail initially. Where has it said that he is out on bail again, the link says that he's back in police custody!

I give up............... If you've got a rational point, make it, don't just give up!

Totally irrelevant, the court is considering the offence in question nothing to do with previous offences. One of the reasons given is to "prevent further offences being committed whilst he is on bail" Garbage. The fact that this man has not been found guilty of any previous offences is very relevant and would be in the UK also. Are you assuming that this Thai man has been given bail again when the link clearly stated that he was back in custody?

How do you know that this alleged case WAS ALL ABOUT MONEY???!!!!! Edited for the correct number of exclamation marks.

And he was offered a full refund that he rejected!

Make up your mind, which one was it, allegedly because you are a foreigner or because you had a medical service that would not be free for any nationality?

But, in this case, he has not been found guilty of any previous offences and, I can assure you, in the UK, that would be taken into consideration!

Glad that you got the point eventually. By the way, if bail is available for unconvicted "killers", why shouldn't he be entitled to make use of it if the court doesn't object?

Thanks for confirming that you weren't just passing on her details willy-nilly (which is what I was referring to), you asked her permission first.

https://www.thephuketnews.com/two-killed-in-phuket-bus-terminal-shooting-78768.php So? How about posting a link to where it confirms that he has been found guilty of murder in a court? So far, that has not happened so he has not been found guilty of murder yet.

How do you know that it is untrue?

Can you read the link?According to the police he already confessed to the two murders. You really can't read the link, can you? He has not been found guilty of any murders, he has bail in order to prepare his defence against the first charges.

"Typically Thailand!" ? Typical Thaivisa response, "I won't bother to read the provided link before posting". "But don't sell a beer in your restaurants". What? Get up to date, beer is available in restaurants.

You can't read the link? He has not been found guilty of any murders!