thaibeachlovers

No, never, no, not for any farang in LOS, IMO.

I'd guess it depends if it's financially advantageous for single females to have children. In some countries it beats working for a living as other people have to pay to support their life style.

Japan already had a low birth rate as does Singapore. China of course was the poster child for a low birth rate per female. As women become more independent their career becomes more important to them than looking after some thing that cries and poops all day. If I woke up one morning magically transformed into a female of child bearing age, I'd be sterilised as soon as I could, as zero desire to pop any out.

I'm calling BS on that as it doesn't mention looking at porn. I've heard that that was the most looked at thing on the internet, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's true.

Who writes these things? That's as long as many spend working, so unless that is including computer time at work, if 14 hours a day is at work or on line, when do people find time to do anything else, or do they go without sleep?

No disagreement from me on the OP headline. Just so long as they can fly.

Which is why it's great that we now can try before we buy. When I was a child that rarely if ever happened, because if she got pregnant ( long before the pill ) one better marry her, or else. It was a great shame then to have an illegitimate child. Software won't allow b*s*a*d even though it's a noun.

They even get tutored how to catch a rich man. https://www.eliteconnections.com/8-steps-marry-millionaire/

They even get tutored how to catch a rich man https://www.eliteconnections.com/8-steps-marry-millionaire/

Perhaps those even poorer countries are dangerous or the women ugly. Even if the hookers in Somalia were available for $5 long time, who would go there for wild nights? I'm told the women in Colombia are gorgeous, but somehow I don't feel any desire to find out if it's true.

Nah. If you were a millionaire you'd have to beat them off with a stick. Of course none of them would be gold diggers- just women looking for a man to luuuuurve.

If my first partner ( the one sent from Hades to ruin me ) had died in our 4th year of relationship I'd now own a house worth 1.5 million $, and a classic muscle car. Do I wish she had............................................?

You were a success then. My success rate was 0%.

I'm quite educated thanks. The discussion was about Americans, not other countries and the topic is still retiring in Thailand.

Thanks for your fascinating contribution. I never even knew ladyboys existed till long after I left school and they certainly didn't have classes about them.

Given that ( as this thread proved ) it's still not really acceptable to many, guys that do like to walk on the wild side occasionally are probably not going to be doing so where they can be observed. People that like ladyboys don't have horns so they can be identified as such. I can say without contradiction that none of the men I know will ever admit in public that they like a bit of the other, and for most it's probably just pictures on the internet with the door locked.

Bad day?

Some people just want to put everyone in little boxes so they can be controlled, IMO. Far as I'm concerned LGBQT and all that is just total BS. People are what they are, and if they want wear a miniskirt with a feather somewhere and have sex with trannies that's OK with me just so long as they don't do it in my face.

Perhaps they didn't "start" the Vietnam war, but they certainly invented ways to get involved it, IMO. Perhaps you have forgotten the Gulf of Tonkin incident? They might also be responsible for the Bay of Pigs, though that never developed into a proper "war" as Kennedy apparently didn't support it. Let's not forget the coups they backed either, even if no American boots on the ground. However, that's all a looooong way from retirement in Thailand so that's it from me on that subject.

No.

Ah, but they can be a Bi that only likes men that look like women. Where does that fall in the lexicon? Personally I don't take any notice of silly labels. People have every sort of different druthers under the sun and if they like a feminine man that looks like a female and want to play house with them, so long as it doesn't inconvenience anyone else, it's no body else's business.

What about the ones that don't have any of those characteristics?

Up to you.

That's probably correct. A nurse has a recognised qualification and is trained to carry out medical procedures, and sometimes unqualified people are used to sit and observe the patient or give them a wash. I did that as a student in ICU once- just sat with a dying patient, but I wasn't qualified to do any medical treatments. It would only be a problem if she had been expected to give drugs or carry out a Dr's instructions.

You are the one that mentioned transexual. Not the same as a ladyboy IMO.