sirineou

You freaked me out there for a minute until I realise that FL was mentioned in my profile Close but no cigar. Daytona Beach, Where are you from? and please don't say California.

I can not believe that you would sink so low as to insinuate that any of the trumps would lie. I suggest you say 10 hail Marys . wash your mouth with soap, and not that Irish Spring soap crap either, use real lye soap young man, and then go to your room and think of what you've done!!

Ok you got me! you got me to inflict upon myself the indignity of having to endure Chicken Don's whining voice for several minutes. Because I like to be fair, I started at 1:00:00 as you suggested ,and nowhere from that to the end of this horrible speech did he mentioned "Christians" so that his voter ID BS would be providing the context. Did he mention voter IDs ? he sure did, among many other things that he also mentioned , then by your logic all this other things would be equally contextual to the "Christian" comment also.

Not From the UK , and in view of the results of the giant IQ test trump's candidacy has giving us I am embraced to say that I am also American .

What does that have to do with what I said concerning multiple choice test probabilities? and where did you find that statistic? I did a search and could not find such statistic. PS: sorry , I read your previous which I had missed and now i see the relevance of this post.

Is this also an old picture laughing boy.

Not sure where Mangabaga is , but I sure would love to live there. Though I can see some problems with my family in the US who when they ask me where I live , i tell them I live in Mangabaga, at which point they will surely ask me how much I had to drink and start arranging an intervention. .

"Donald Trump Photo Without Ear Bandage Raises Eyebrows " https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-photo-without-ear-bandage-raises-eyebrows-1931403

Are you changing the subject now?

No my friend , you completely missed the point about :dog whistles" But even your contention that "it was taken out of context" does not sound correct . So I went to Fox entertainment news, thinking that every other news outlet was biased. and here is what Chicken Don said himself at a fox interview after the event "Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Monday repeatedly prodded former President Trump over his comments at a conservative Christian summit, where he told attendees they won’t have to vote anymore after November. Trump did little to push back on the backlash over his remarks, as some Democrats have suggested the former president was saying there would be no more elections if he won. Instead, Trump repeatedly argued his comments were because Christians do not vote in large numbers, and he offhandedly questioned Jewish voters who support Democrats." Nowhere did he say anything that he was taken out of context. Not sure how you came up with it.

Though both of your methods are correct and you will be scoring 100% Method B will be going against your phrase "TWO ways to score very well on any multiple choice test. " with the operative word being "well"

No! but at the end of the year all the points will be calculated and the three highest finalists will receive a set of Asean Now commemorative plates, to be displayed with pride at your place of residence. It is an awesome responsibility and honor, so apply yourself diligently. .

Like I am going to sit there and listen to an hour of Chicken Don word salad. Do you understand what a "dog whistle" in propaganda is? Not all of us are a "simple" as Chicken Don followers.

At least this first year should be interesting with tax office officers having no idea what the different tax reciprocity Agreement are with dozens of countries. And if the immigration offices and their different interpretations' and selective enforcement at different regions are any indication, this should end up being a huge cluster fuk .

Ohh! the gremar pilice rstrikes adain.

The only thing "alleged" is your intelligence I mean the genocide at hand

Not pro palestinian, Anti genocide.

Well they did also say Social security and annuities, I agree, I am just going to assume that non of the funds I transferred are non assessable, and not file a tax return. Let them audit me. then I can simply claim that all the funds I transferred were from savings realised before 2024 . If the Thai tax profesional are not sure , how the heck can we be? and that's seven months in the Taxable year. TIT

And once he fixes it the Beautiful Christians will not have to vote any more. How about the Interactive Christians of which there are many, would they have to vote? I love it when Chicken Don says things and then his supporters come back and try to explain what he really meant to say. If you are going to regurgitate republican talking points . please try and get them right, what you said makes no sense .

Sure, so could dog poop.

If 66% of funds raised are from small donations, the people are voting with their donations . All the polls prior to her becoming the nominee were garbage . People did not know her, they were following the narrative about her perpetrated by the trumpsters, (I don't even say Republicans because they are not Republicans), Now we are getting a chance to see her and the contrast between her and Chicken Don.

I did not see that. they must have fixed that glitz by the time I got there,. But yours sounds like the kind of quiz I would do very well in Joking of course, without the challenge what's the point. I tried to start a quiz thread years ago, and it went well for a few pages, but then , I believe. without the time restrain , google defeated the whole purpose of it. People Think that Google is a good thing and in many ways it is, but there is no substitute for having the information rather than having quick access to it . There is a danger to having quick access to information because it makes people mentally lazy, and in a way functioning idiots, because if you have access to information but not in your brain, it plays little part in your cognitive process. When connecting the dots in your mind, you simply do not have this dot instantly available to connect. Ands since you often don't know what you dont know, you don't have the capacity to Google it. Does that make any sense?

The US knew that Russia would not have a choice other than to invade . Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy Former President of France initially stated their opposition to NATO eastern expansion "Merkel said that NATO membership would have damaged Ukraine and that Putin would have seen it as akin to a “declaration of war, " CIA Director Bill Burns , and then Ambassador to Russia warned Washington "Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all redlines for the Russian elite (not just Putin). In more than two and a half years of conversations with key Russian players…I have yet to find anyone who view Ukraine in NATO as anything other than a direct challenge to Russian interests.” " https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2022/04/28/did-the-us-really-take-russias-nato-concerns-very-seriously/ Many many others warned yet it came as a surprise to the US when Russia invaded Ukraine. If you believe that it did come as a surprise IMO you are soft between the ears. Ukraine was canon fodder in a successful attempt of the US to restart the cold war. Something that you and your children will be paying for generations to come.

Not to the question of what started the Ukraine war. Obviously something that happen after the war started could not had been the cause of the war.

I did not see them but I do have a strong opinion about them.