josephbloggs

Another imagined scenario. Another imaged conspiracy. Try commenting after things actually happen, not getting upset by things you have only imagined might happen at some point in the future, possibly.

This is hilarious to read. You must be gutted when Muslims/brown people actually get arrested, go through the criminal justice system, go to trial and get found guilty. It takes away your opportunity to cry "conspiracy", or to be aggrieved as a white person. I do feel for you. So when they above happens (as it generally does) rather than just quietly ignore it you then make up things to be aggrieved about! Ah, they only got found guilty because there was too much heat. Righty ho. Lucky it wasn't the "two tier" justice system in this case, phew. Ah but wait, there's more! They only got prosecuted in the first place because of Farage! If it wasn't for him and his pesky meddling they would have got away with it! You actually believe the Crown Prosecution Service only prosecuted because that saggy faced fog horn opened his gob? You are the most gullible, most easily malleable follower he could ever wish for, literally you are Farage's wet dream. He is a bandwagon jumping opportunist, nothing more. But you're not done yet, now you're imagining the judge doesn't want to give him a lengthy sentence.........because he's muslim, right? Feeling aggrieved by something that hasn't happened, and already got your excuse in for why it did happen if it does (only because of the heat, too hot for two tier blah blah vomit). Absolutely hilarious to watch you flounder around.

Says the man who calls anyone who criticises Israel "anti semitic".

"Inferior to men in most aspect of life". Says it all about you. In case you didn't notice, this was a women's team playing in a women's tournament against other women's teams. So all the rest of your hateful nonsense about men being better is just your misogyny, pure and simple. If they said they were entering the women's team in to the men's world cup because they are just as good then you might have a point. But again, in case reading the article is too much for you, they didn't. As it is you have no point, so just tootle back to your 1930's black and white life and leave us alone. Oh, and your argument about it not being sexist is just as weak as the people saying "I can't be racist because Islam isn't a race", or "I can't be racist because I had a black friend in school". Trot along.

Kind of depressing that an article about the success of the women's team just has all the usual trolls out saying it's rubbish, not as good as men's (no one said it was), DEI, Labour, Labour, Guardian, blah blah blah. It doesn't matter if they can't kick the ball as hard as a man (or whatever your gripe is exactly, as I am not sure), they have defeated the reigning world champions in their sport and retained the European Championship - a remarkable achievement in any sport. Just, for once, it would be nice to say "well done" and leave it at that. Now back to the bashing and misogyny.....

Read the article. No one has a problem with the team's colour of the manager's colour. It is an opinion piece on the grass routes development and scouting network of the women's game. No one is saying put a black girl in the team for the sake of it.

No.

Sad little men with sad little lives.

Agree the standard is not as high as men's but it is hardly "atrocious" and the matches can be quite exciting with less of the theatrics of the men. But men's football is obviously a higher level.

Yes, they say they will be it in English. They use the international feed from PLP which comes clean and with commentary. They will add Thai commentary to the clean feed, so you will have both options.

No, incorrect. It was 1-1 after extra time then went to a penalty shootout which England won 3-1.

Wow, everything is a "MSM" conspiracy with you isn't it. A lowly ranked women's team lost a warm up match. It's hardly going to topple the Gaza starvation from the front page is it? "MSM buried it". What a world you live in...

Thank you. Much underused.

That's clear. So why bother to pollute this thread with your hateful nonsense?

What the hell are you wibbling on about? I worry about you.

And NMC battery for the performance. LFP only for the standard model. Boooooo.

Thanks for checking. Definitely blocked by Cambodia then as I can access if I set my VPN to Cambodia. That the army are saying the Thais have blocked it so you don't see "the slanderous news about Cambodia because they are the perpetrators but are afraid that people will know the truth" but have blocked it themselves is very telling.

Saw my first MG IM6 today. Wow, looks great. And the spec is amazing! Anyone buying one? https://www.mgcars.com/en/cars/mg-im6

That's what they say, but it makes no sense. I just set my VPN to Cambodia and I can access every Thai media outlet I can think of. It can only be blocked by Cambodia as they don't want people to read "the other side" as it is very very different from what they are being told. Well you are actually in Cambodia. Can you access https://www.khaosodenglish.com/ ? https://www.nationthailand.com/ ? Find one you are blocked from accessing and I will try with a Cambodia VPN, if I can access it then the blocking is happening from Cambodia. I am sure there is misinformation on both sides.

I would think it is far more likely that access has been blocked by Cambodian authorities, no?

Come on, it's simple!

Do you check what the destination airport passenger service charge is (that is included in your ticket price) before you go on holiday? Wow. And would an increase of 100 baht on the price of your ticket (when Thai PSC is one of the lowest already) make you change your destination? Double wow. How do you afford holidays?

Sign, not this again. I am just trying to give information and not looking for an argument, but you pop up to start one. I'll try again. The longest single journey fare is 62 baht. You spent 107 baht by making two journeys. You spent 62 baht on the green line, then 45 baht on the pink line. You exited the green line through the exit gate, journey complete, 62 baht, thank you. You then entered the pink line through the ticket barrier then exited at the other end, journey complete, 45 baht, thank you. If the flat 20 baht fare was in place that would be two journeys @ 20 baht = 40 baht. The longest single journey with a flat fare would be 20 baht. But if you string a few together it can be 40 baht, 60 baht, 80 baht. As I said on the other thread if you exit one paid area that's the end of a journey. If you really want to make up the longest single journey fare it is technically possible to use connections to ride on all line lines: start on green, exit, go to yellow and do the whole length, exit, go on blue, exit, go on red, exit, go on purple, exit, go on pink, and then complain a single journey cost 400 baht (or whatever it would be). Just let it go, please. Legal permanent residents are eligible. Tourists are not.

In the UK, at 60 years old if you live in London you get a 60+ Oyster card which gives you free bus, tube, trains on the TfL network. This is not available for tourists or non residents, they pay full price. In the UK, if you are over 67 you get free bus travel nationally. Not available for tourists or non UK citizens. They pay full price.

The longest single journey (in one paid ticketing area) is 62 baht.