Jump to content

Prawit caught red-handed? More watch photos emerge


webfact

Recommended Posts

Prawit caught red-handed? More watch photos emerge

By WASAMON AUDJARINT 
THE NATION

 

27b47069b6212c0efcfcc55b52f4e94d.jpeg

Deputy PM and Defence Minister General Prawit Wongsuwan is seen wearing what look like different models of multimillion-baht Richard Mille watches on two separate occasions.

 

Amid social media furore, NACC ‘ready to probe’ new allegations.

 

IT NEVER rains but it pours for Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister General Prawit Wongsuwan. While he has yet to clarify his possession of a seemingly multimillion-baht watch, social media users have raised questions about seven other watches he is seen wearing at recent events.

 

The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), which is investigating the premier’s respected senior aide, yesterday said that it was ready to probe any new allegations.

 

1.jpg

 

Deputy PM and Defence Minister General Prawit Wongsuwan is seen wearing what look like different models of multimillion-baht Richard Mille watches on two separate occasions. The black-and-red model, left, was spotted during a scholarship granting event in September. The silver-and-black model, right, was seen during a Cabinet photo opportunity on December 4. 

 

“We have to look through his asset-declaration history and see if he has already declared those watches,” said NACC acting secretary-general Worawit Sukboon yesterday.

 

In his four declarations during his off-and-on membership of governments from 2008 to 2014, Prawit has never declared any single asset worth more than Bt200,000 to the NACC. His latest declaration valued his total total assets at Bt87 million.

 

However, pictures show him wearing what look like two Richard Mille watches that are estimated to cost between Bt4 million and Bt10 million. The first watch was spotted when he took part in a group photo with the reshuffled Cabinet at Government House December 4. 

A photo of him shielding his eyes with his hand, revealing the silver-black watch and a diamond ring, sparked controversy.

 

The second watch was revealed yesterday when the Facebook page CSI LA posted photos of Prawit back in September during a Five Provinces Bordering Forest Preservation Foundation event he hosted.

 

2.jpg

 

Giving away compensation and scholarships with a smiling face, Prawit was seen wearing what could be a different Richard Mille watch model with a red and black body.

 

The page’s author speculated that the model might be the Richard Mille RM 030, which normally costs around Bt4 million.

 

The Matter, the alternative news agency, on Tuesday also presented photos of Prawit on nine occasions from 2014 to this year wearing different watches. Although the definition of the photos was limited, three of the watches could be the same while the rest looked distinct.

 

The Matter asked its followers to help identify the watches and their guesses centred on high-end brands such as Patek Philippe, Franck Muller, Audemars Piguet and Rolex, with prices ranging from Bt700,000 to Bt2 million.

 

Prawit has kept mum on the issue since the day he was discovered wearing the extravagant watch last week.

 

Yesterday, without speaking to the press, he went to receive an honorary doctorate degree in public administration from Nakhon Phanom University.

 

He had also stressed shortly after the controversy began that he would only explain his possession of the watch to the NACC, not the public. 

 

Local media reported that Prawit planned to justify himself by saying that the watch was borrowed from a businessman friend and the diamond ring was inherited from his mother.

 

He had planned to send an explanatory letter to the NACC yesterday, but he has not yet done so.

 

The NACC said last Thursday that Prawit would have 30 days to justify himself.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30333880

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-12-14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That a rich friend lent him a watch was always stretching credulity, it was theoretically possible. That a rich friend lent him several hugely expensive watches to wear is ridiculous and ludicrous.

 

This scandal will have legs. It's hard to enrage people over the details of a contract, or over the implications of a trade policy, or over the minutia of a policy change which benefits someone in particular.

 

As I said yesterday, it is easy talking "Bling".

 

People won't forget this one quickly and questions will need to be answered.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, isaanbanhou said:

maybe he is endorsed by the watch company and his contract requires him to wear on.  Micheal Jordan had the same kind of agreement with Nike

 

I was thinking his "friend" was the local agent for the watches. 

 

Either way the publicity must be worth almost as much as the watches themselves, look at the amount of space being given to these previously obscure but quality brands. The resulting brand recognition is something money can't buy (almost).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, rkidlad said:

How to explain this one? 

 

Time to get down to the market and buy some fakes. It’s the best terrible option he has. Popcorn time. 

Yes thats whats happening rignt now. He had to order the fakes to look just like the ones he was wearing.

That takes 30 days to get it just right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, quadperfect said:

Yes thats whats happening rignt now. He had to order the fakes to look just like the ones he was wearing.

That takes 30 days to get it just right.

He gets 30 days from today for his new watch, right? The original one still has about 20 days left to explain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Samui Bodoh said:

That a rich friend lent him a watch was always stretching credulity, it was theoretically possible. That a rich friend lent him several hugely expensive watches to wear is ridiculous and ludicrous.

 

This scandal will have legs. It's hard to enrage people over the details of a contract, or over the implications of a trade policy, or over the minutia of a policy change which benefits someone in particular.

 

As I said yesterday, it is easy talking "Bling".

 

People won't forget this one quickly and questions will need to be answered.

 

Bring back hanging for lying Generals, I say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure i have seen numerous photos of him with huge chunky gold chains and watches as well. Nothing probably in the value of the Richard Mille ones but without doubt above the declaration threshold (unless they are fake). You don't get much for 200,000 baht in Thailand when it comes to branded watches.

 

As others have commented, i would find it more important if the NACC would ask for clarification on  how his wealth has accumulated about 30 million in cash over the past 6 or so years, when on his 2008 (and 2014) declaration there did not seem to be any business interests, valuable land holdings etc noted which could of been sold.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, candide said:

People are really ill intentioned! It's just that he is a very nice guy and has plenty of friends who lend him their watches! 

Like the video of a guy caught stealing a car; he said "he was parking it for a mate".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Further evidence that time is no respecter of men or status and because of that our comeuppance will always be just "a matter of time." I don't know why, but every article regarding this 'government' evokes the time-worn (Sorry, I couldn't resist one more reference) adage: "You can put as much lipstick on a pig as you want but..."

 

Only one thing seems clear at this point. These boys are gonna need a much, much bigger lipstick budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikebell said:

Sorry to bang on about this: he has amassed five million a year over each of the last six years on a stipend of less than 200,000,  He's entitled to buy as many watches as he likes if no-one is questioning where he got the money from.

He must declare them though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...