Dental official shot dead in hospital’s lodging in Chumphon
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
9
Russell Brand criminally charged with rape...
He spouts <deleted>$ and attempts to be funny (and fails miserably). -
-
40
What's Pichit like?
If your bar is that low then yes. I'm sure you can find good things anywhere. -
9
Russell Brand criminally charged with rape...
He spreads conspiracy theories. Attacks US politics in every way possible, but won't dare touch the subject of UK politics. He's just another toxic jizz-stick like Alex Jones. More intelligent and better spoken than AJ, but equally as vile and evil. -
45
Add insults to injuries -- some of the dumbest details about Trump's ruinous tariffs
Donald Trump’s tariff plan, implemented since his second term began on January 20, 2025, has introduced significant changes to U.S. trade policy, with a mix of reciprocal tariffs (e.g., 10% universal, 20% on the EU), targeted levies (e.g., 25% on Canada and Mexico, up to 50% on some nations), and sector-specific duties (e.g., 25% on steel and autos). As of April 4, 2025, less than three months into his term, concrete outcomes are still emerging, but early indicators, policy shifts, and sentiment from various stakeholders suggest several positive outcomes and potential benefits. Here’s an analysis based on available data and developments: 1. Increased Foreign Investment in U.S. Manufacturing Outcome: Trump’s tariff threats and actual impositions have spurred commitments for foreign investment in U.S.-based production to avoid duties. Posts on X and White House statements claim over $1 trillion in pledged investments since late 2024, though exact figures are unverified as of now. Evidence: Companies like Toyota and Volkswagen, facing 25% auto tariffs, have signaled plans to expand U.S. plants—Toyota reportedly eyeing a $2 billion facility in North Carolina by March 31, 2025, per industry buzz on X. The National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO) praised the plan on April 3, noting it’s driving textile firms to reshore. Benefit: This could create jobs—potentially thousands in manufacturing—and reduce reliance on imports, aligning with Trump’s "America First" pitch. A 2024 study cited by the White House found first-term tariffs led to "significant reshoring" in steel and manufacturing, suggesting a repeatable effect. 2. Strengthened Leverage in Trade Negotiations Outcome: Tariffs have pressured trading partners to negotiate. Mexico deployed 10,000 troops to its borders by March 2025, and Canada tightened migrant checks after Trump’s 25% tariff orders in February, aiming to curb drugs and illegal crossings. Evidence: Colombia reversed its stance on accepting U.S. deportee flights within 10 hours of a tariff threat in March 2025, per CNN. The White House touts this as proof of tariffs’ coercive power, with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt highlighting it on March 25. Benefit: Enhanced border security and reduced fentanyl inflows (e.g., precursor chemicals from China) could save lives—over 70,000 U.S. overdose deaths were linked to fentanyl in 2023. It also shifts some enforcement burden to neighbors, easing U.S. resources. 3. Boost to Domestic Industries Outcome: Protected sectors like steel and autos are seeing early gains. U.S. steel output rose 3% in Q1 2025 (projected), with companies like Nucor announcing $1.5 billion in upgrades by March 30, per industry reports. Evidence: The 25% steel tariff, expanded February 10, 2025, ended exemptions, spurring domestic production. X posts from business leaders (e.g., @WhiteHouse , March 31) claim tariffs are "strengthening American companies," with auto parts firms in Ohio and Michigan reporting order upticks. Benefit: Job retention or growth in these sectors—steel added 1,800 jobs in Trump’s first term per a 2023 ITC report—could stabilize industrial heartlands. Higher domestic prices also pad producer profits, potentially funding innovation or wages. 4. Revenue Generation for Tax Relief Outcome: Tariffs are generating federal revenue, with early estimates suggesting $50–$70 billion collected by April 2025 from the 10% universal tariff (effective April 5) and higher rates on select countries. Evidence: The Tax Foundation projected a 10% tariff could raise $2 trillion over a decade; pro-rated, that’s $50 billion in three months, aligning with current trends. Trump’s team aims to use this for tax cuts, like no tax on tips or Social Security benefits, per White House statements. Benefit: This could offset income tax burdens for working families, boosting disposable income. A Peterson Institute brief estimated Trump’s tariff mix might yield $200 billion annually, offering fiscal flexibility if sustained. 5. Reduction in Trade Deficit (Preliminary) Outcome: The U.S. goods trade deficit, over $1 trillion in 2024, may be shrinking as imports drop. February 2025 imports fell 8% from January, per preliminary CBP data, partly due to tariff anticipation. Evidence: X posts (e.g., @ExxAlerts , March 25) claim tariffs are "channeling trillions" to balance trade, though this exaggerates current scale. The 49% tariff on Cambodia and 46% on Vietnam (April 9) aim to erase deficits with "worst offenders," per Trump’s April 2 announcement. Benefit: A smaller deficit could strengthen the U.S. dollar and economic sovereignty, reducing dependence on foreign goods—a core Trump goal since his first term’s USMCA renegotiation. -
84
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now