Jump to content

Thailand suggests slower bullet train amid high cost estimate


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thailand suggests slower bullet train amid high cost estimate

Proposal could lead to concessions from Japan or project's demise

HIROSHI KOTANI, Nikkei staff writer

 

BANGKOK -- A project to build a high-speed railway in Thailand based on Japan's shinkansen technology has taken an unexpected turn, with the Southeast Asian country considering a significant downgrade to cut costs.

 

Not so fast

 

"The 670km Thai-Japanese high-speed train project stretching from Bangkok to Chiang Mai is to have its maximum speed lowered to reduce the overall cost of the project," the English-language Bangkok Post wrote Dec. 27.

 

Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, who leads the country's junta, instructed transport officials to consider reducing the top speed from 300kph to between 180kph and 200kph. The development came less than two weeks after a report by Japan calculated the project's cost at 420 billion baht ($13.1 billion), a sum Bangkok deems too high.

 

Full story: https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Thailand-suggests-slower-bullet-train-amid-high-cost-estimate

 

-- NIKKEI ASIAN REVIEW 2018-01-18

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

It defeats the point really having a fast train service go slower. Then again it is pointless having a BTS system that has so few carriages that there are so big queues, that using public transport to reduce road traffic congestion, is worthless. Must be another 'Thainess' concept I haven't got my head round, even after 17 years living here full time.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

It defeats the point really having a fast train service go slower. Then again it is pointless having a BTS system that has so few carriages that there are so big queues, that using public transport to reduce road traffic congestion, is worthless. Must be another 'Thainess' concept I haven't got my head round, even after 17 years living here full time.

Submarine2.jpg.c55acd654a53534ad7c10b333f665e23.jpg

Posted
19 minutes ago, HooHaa said:

perhaps a bb, pellet or slingshot train would be advisable 

 

I was just going to suggest renaming it the slingshot train as well 555

 

Bullet train sounds pretty ridiculous once you remove the speed. 

Posted (edited)

Just need to stick the old 10 horsepower Kubota engine in it and she'll be right.

Edited by akirasan
Posted (edited)

 

The speed doesn't really make much difference to the price most tracks even metros have tolerances similar to high speed.Still the same viaducts, tunnels and land formation. Unless they are going for wooden sleeper and ballast,. But then again it was all probably bullshit from the start

Edited by Dave67
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, CelticBhoy said:

Does the bullet train then become the pea-shooter train?  :smile:

A  <deleted>  train

Edited by Dave67
Posted
3 hours ago, rebo said:

Seems the coffers are empty ...

 

I have a mental image of the next government visiting the Treasury and finding it stacked with cash around the outside, but hollow and empty in the centre - something like those rice warehouses of a few years ago.

Posted

And having decided to run it slower, will they also now admit that the Chinese-line will similarly be medium-speed, rather than keeping-up the pretence of 'high-speed' ? :wink:

Posted

Think it's about time to forget the train lines.....just can't see very much happening for years and years....except maybe 3.5km in Nakon somewhere!

Posted
12 hours ago, Dave67 said:

 

The speed doesn't really make much difference to the price most tracks even metros have tolerances similar to high speed.Still the same viaducts, tunnels and land formation. Unless they are going for wooden sleeper and ballast,. But then again it was all probably bullshit from the start

Can someone remind me I Recall High speed bullshit express Line 1 was China to Lam Chabang,  Is this one part of High speed bullshit express line 2 or 3 ?

Posted

What is expensive tomorrow will be considered cheap next year or in the future as costs always going up....

Of course there is a strong opposition anyway from insiders and certain business tycoons who stand to lose out should that HST

Materialises?

Posted

Well it would be a lot safer ,they had difficulty keeping the

really slow trains on that route, on the tracks.

regards worgeordie

Posted

The speed of the train was never going to be 300kph as claimed in this story. It was always intended to be 250kph so a drop of around 50kph is not so big deal. Poor reporting.

So here they are debating how fast it will go and how much will they spend only weeks before they promised construction would begin next month. Typical military style bungling governance.

So can it be expected the same will apply to the Chinese fast train line through to Nong Khai? Presumably the budgets for both have been revised downward because of other financial pressures. 

IMHO the chances of these high speed trains ever happening is almost nil. This military junta seems to have trouble making even the most simplest things happen including holding an election and clearing footpaths.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...