21 hours ago, tryasimight said:

It's a walking, quacking, shitting duck?? 

I like your sense of humor, but only if you understand the reason/basis of what I posted!!

On 2/11/2018 at 4:08 PM, Just Weird said:

That may be the case if I was a shill but as I'm not, it isn't.  So your suggestion, which you did not pose as a question but as a rhetorical insult, remains an insult.

 

By the way, it's clear that you don't really know what "shill" means, but then that's hardly a big surprise.

Oh dear, what a sensitive little soul.  

I am well aware what a shill is and the fact that you are hell bent on back-peddling shows I have hit a nerve?  (Hint - the question mark kind of gives away the fact that is it a question, rhetorical or not!).  trying to take me to task on my English or grammar is pointless as you clearly come to the gunfight bringing only a banana!

You were caught out.  Accept it and move on.

 

Looks like he may have dropped the soap...

2 hours ago, thaichiro said:

Looks like he may have dropped the soap...

He served in the Navy?  

 

Oooops, wrong, the Navy  was about the "golden rivet". 

On ‎2‎/‎12‎/‎2018 at 4:42 PM, saminoz said:

Oh dear, what a sensitive little soul.  

I am well aware what a shill is and the fact that you are hell bent on back-peddling shows I have hit a nerve?  (Hint - the question mark kind of gives away the fact that is it a question, rhetorical or not!).  trying to take me to task on my English or grammar is pointless as you clearly come to the gunfight bringing only a banana!

You were caught out.  Accept it and move on.

 

I'm not at all sensitive, I just don't accept wildly inaccurate assertions intended as an insult by someone who can't back it up.

 

It's also clear that you do not understand the concept of 'back-pedaling' and 'caught out' either and that you have an oddly high and dramatic opinion of yourself if you think that your little digs constitute a 'gunfight!

On Sat Feb 10 2018 at 10:57 AM, sweatalot said:

A policeman - a public servant - being that rich looks fishy

 

He should understand that and that he ows the public

a clear proof that everything he did was ok, by the law and by ethical standards

Laws and ethical standards are subjective here, like art and music there is no "right or wrong" there is only what you like and what i like..he likes, like everybody else here  in power filling his boots with as much as he can as quick as he can without regaurd..

On Sun Feb 11 2018 at 6:38 AM, Sydebolle said:

Prawit must be very happy having the lime light swinging in another direction prior to proceed to Premchai's little hunting night with leopard's tail soup. 

Is anybody in this government aware of the fact, that those all those crooks make Thailand look seriously ridiculous with their stealing, lying and lame excusing? 

Even my grand son comes up with better "talking my way out of it" and he just hit his sixth birthday! 

It was only a matter of time and bunkering down. He knew that, you and i and most here knew that....nary a days goes by without some corruption scandel hitting the news.....and what is shocking ?

it is merely the tip of the iceberg..