Britain is facing serious far-right terrorism threat, top UK officer says

[alfieconn]

2 hours ago, Morch said:

 

How so? The OP does not deny or ignore Islamic terrorism,  nor does it imply that right wing attacks are worse or represent more of a danger.

Who said he did ?  but he seems a lot more concerned with the Right Wing Terrorism threat 

Quote

 Britain is facing serious far-right terrorism threat, top UK officer says

than he is with what the follower's of Islam are trying are doing to the country !!!!

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, alfieconn said:

Who said he did ?  but he seems a lot more concerned with the Right Wing Terrorism threat 

than he is with what the follower's of Islam are trying are doing to the country !!!!

Perhaps he was drawing attention to the threat from the far-right extremists. 

 

But if you insist on whataboutary I'll take it as evidence you don't really understand the extent of the threats the UK faces..... even when they are explained to you.

 

[thaibeachlovers]

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Perhaps, there's a senior police officer with real knowledge of the security situation telling it as it is. 

 

That might upset your view of who is a terrorist, but I'll trust the views of the police officer with firsthand knowledge over some barstool pundit.

Of course the police have never been known to get it wrong, have they?

I still remember the Guilford 4 and the Maguire 7. Fine bit of policing there.

[alfieconn]

3 hours ago, champers said:

The right wing activists in the UK are essentially cowards and bullies, as well as being none too bright.

I would have no objection to them being rounded up and locked up, following due process, of course.

I have seen them marching through a UK city and what a sorry and pathetic bunch of halfwits they look too.

Might well be but i don't see them blowing up children or committing  any other cowardly act's that seem's to happen on a regular basis in the UK !

[Chomper Higgot]

2 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Of course the police have never been known to get it wrong, have they?

I still remember the Guilford 4 and the Maguire 7. Fine bit of policing there.

Thanks for reminding us Thaibeachlover. 

 

You will of course recall the Guilfod 4 and Maguire 7 were miscarriages of justice that arose from the police 'picking up the usual suspects'.

 

Guilt had nothing to do with it, when ethnicity was all the police were looking for.

 

Let's learn from history.

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

5 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

Might well be but i don't see them blowing up children or committing  any other cowardly act's that seem's to happen on a regular basis in the UK !

Well you've now been informed of four occasions when the police prevented them from doing so.

[alfieconn]

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Perhaps he was drawing attention to the threat from the far-right extremists. 

 

But if you insist on whataboutary I'll take it as evidence you don't really understand the extent of the threats the UK faces..... even when they are explained to you.

 

Where was it explained to me ?

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, alfieconn said:

Where was it explained to me ?

Read and inwardly digest the OP.

[alfieconn]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Well you've now been informed of four occasions when the police prevented them from doing so.

The police prevented them from doing what exactly ?

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, alfieconn said:

The police prevented them from doing what exactly ?

Read and inwardly digest the OP.

[alfieconn]

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Read and inwardly digest the OP.

Could you cut and paste the parts where the extent of the threats were explained !

[Chomper Higgot]

2 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

Could you cut and paste the parts where the extent of the threats were explained !

I'm very sure the police officer gave the information he wished to give and withheld that which he did not. 

 

He is certainly is warning of the threat of terrorism from the far right and you are certainly playing whataboutary.

 

 

Off the pot now, what do you find so offensive about a retiring senior police officer highlighting the threat of far right terrorism?

 

 

[dunroaming]

5 hours ago, the guest said:

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Many British I'm sure along with EU are feeling that their values are being watered-down by non-conformist immigrants unable to embrace their values. I'm not surprised things are kicking-off, and I'm sure this problem will only spread.

Well it's nothing new in Britain.  Remember the brown shirts?  There are a lot of far right racists in the UK and always have been.  Every country have their racists.   Fortunately most are just hot air windbags but there are always some who will follow the bullsh*t and believe it.

[alfieconn]

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I'm very sure the police officer gave the information he wished to give and withheld that which he did not. 

 

He is certainly is warning of the threat of terrorism from the far right and you are certainly playing whataboutary.

 

 

Off the pot now, what do you find so offensive about a retiring senior police officer highlighting the threat of far right terrorism?

 

 

So it wasn't explained then ? but you said it was explained in the OP   

Quote

Read and inwardly digest the OP.

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

3 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

So it wasn't explained then ? but you said it was explained in the OP   

 

 

I think what needs explaining is your eagerness to play down the threat of rightwing terrorism in the UK. 

 

You very clearly object to it even being discussed. 

[lovelomsak]

I do not see right wingers as a threat any more I see them as our freedom fighter's.

[canuckamuck]

When Britain was fighting the Nazis, being far right was the only chance they had to save their culture.

This time though there is a 1000 Chamberlains to each Churchill.

 

[alfieconn]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I think what needs explaining is your eagerness to play down the threat of rightwing terrorism in the UK. 

 

You very clearly object to it even being discussed. 

At least we have cleared up that it wasn't explained  

 

 

[simple1]

1 hour ago, sanemax said:

Which process would you like to see in order to "lock them up "?

Its no illegal to be "right-wing" , "cowards , "bullies" or " none too bright"

On what charges would you like to see them jailed for ?

Could be that you are a lefty , who doesnt believe in free speech and you would like anyone whom you disagree with, to be silenced ?

A number of far right organisations have been banned by HMG. e.g. National Action, a good idea to understand why. I'm sure you would not wish to be misunderstood as a supporter or apologist for terrorism as are some other members in this topic.

Edited February 27, 2018 by simple1

[alfieconn]

7 minutes ago, simple1 said:

A number of far right organisations have been banned by HMG. e.g. National Action, a good idea to understand why. I'm sure you would not wish to be misunderstood as a supporter or apologist for terrorism as are some other members in this topic.

Can you name them Poster's and quote their post's so i can put them ignore please !

[dunroaming]

22 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

When Britain was fighting the Nazis, being far right was the only chance they had to save their culture.

This time though there is a 1000 Chamberlains to each Churchill.

 

When in doubt quote the second world war .   Not sure about your post though.  Are you saying that the far right in Britain were fighting for their culture?  I always thought that the far right fascist Nazi party were the bad guys?  Not sure my father who fought in the second world war would have wanted to be called far right, he would be turning in his grave!

[Air Smiles]

3 hours ago, champers said:

The EDL. They were all corralled in a pub before their march and after their fill of Dutch courage were allowed to lay a wreath at the war memorial. This was acompanied by a forest of Nazi salutes, probably their idea of a "tribute" but actually a huge insult to people who died fighting the likes of them.

 

I seen one EDL holding aloft a model Spitfire in a gesture of defiance, seemingly oblivious to the fact the Spitfire's sole purpose was to kill as many Nazis as possible.

[Air Smiles]

32 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

When Britain was fighting the Nazis, being far right was the only chance they had to save their culture.

 

Even by your standards, that is a particularly idiotic comment.

[ballpoint]

This is nothing new.  They've been warning about fascists trying to mow down crowds on their bicycles for years now.

 

[alfieconn]

2 minutes ago, Air Smiles said:

 

I seen one EDL holding aloft a model Spitfire in a gesture of defiance, seemingly oblivious to the fact the Spitfire's sole purpose was to kill as many Nazis as possible.

That's absolutely terrible, have him hanged drawn and quartered !

[malagateddy]

Face facts here..imo..Austria..Poland..etc..refuse muslim immigrants as they want to preserve their Christian way of life..whats wrong with that??
I do not believe in multi-culturism..it is s joke..BIG TIME

Sent from my SM-G7102 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

[canuckamuck]

7 minutes ago, dunroaming said:

When in doubt quote the second world war .   Not sure about your post though.  Are you saying that the far right in Britain were fighting for their culture?  I always thought that the far right fascist Nazi party were the bad guys?  Not sure my father who fought in the second world war would have wanted to be called far right, he would be turning in his grave!

Of course the far right in Britain were fighting for their culture and it was glorious. They were all nationalists in that era. 

The Nazi's were socialists that adopted a likeness of nationalism but by nationalism they meant the state, not the people. It was an authoritarian regime. Everything and everyone was subject to the state.

So it was not as simple as right against right. It was a nation against a state.

[alfieconn]

Just what the country need's, a assistant commissioner who is in denial !

 

Khurram Butt murdered 7 Londoners on London Bridge PC Mark Rowley stated there was no evidence to suggest Khurram Butt was planning an attack, even though he was filmed spreading ISIS propaganda and praying with ISIS flag. All for a Channel 4 documentary "Jihadi next door"! and was also reported to the police twice.

PC Mark Rowley (Head of Counter-Terrorism) was responsible for Westminster police being unarmed at the gates of Parliament. Too scary for the tourists to see machine guns. PC Palmer was stabbed to death by a Jihadi because of that policy Why wasn't Rowley sacked?

 

 

[dunroaming]

9 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

Of course the far right in Britain were fighting for their culture and it was glorious. They were all nationalists in that era. 

The Nazi's were socialists that adopted a likeness of nationalism but by nationalism they meant the state, not the people. It was an authoritarian regime. Everything and everyone was subject to the state.

So it was not as simple as right against right. It was a nation against a state.

Rubbish

[alfieconn]

.

Edited February 27, 2018 by alfieconn