Jump to content

Porn star sues Trump's personal lawyer for defamation


webfact

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, boomerangutang said:

Typical Trump shielder type of shielding/deflecting.  Trump and his fans can't counter Stormy with facts, so they devolve to trying to besmirch her.  It brings to mind how the woman who claims she was twice raped by trump at 14 years, was physically blocked from going to court by trump fans. Dec. 2016. ....while Trump's fans shouted ugly aspersions at her - for having the audacity to take her rapist to court.

 

 

You're a hater and jealous of his life.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, boomerangutang said:

Typical Trump shielder type of shielding/deflecting.  Trump and his fans can't counter Stormy with facts, so they devolve to trying to besmirch her.  It brings to mind how the woman who claims she was twice raped by trump at 14 years, was physically blocked from going to court by trump fans. Dec. 2016. ....while Trump's fans shouted ugly aspersions at her - for having the audacity to take her rapist to court.

 

 

 

imo  the monica lewinski clinton scandal was an equal waste of time and money

 

my response was about a post saying stormy was tainted by the likes of trump sex encounter but she has performed with a multitude of male porn actors and not too many of them are arkansas lawyers and rhodes scholars 

 

if true trump raped a 15 year old then he should be tried and imprisoned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Thakkar said:

That makes the funds used a campaign contribution

 

 

thats a matter the lawyers will figure out. seems a campaign contribution should go directly to a campaign and then if those officially earmarked funds go to pay "gag money" then it looks clearly as you say.     didn't a lawyer use his own money to pay daniels ?  

 

just my non lawyer ideas.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Credo said:

The fact that Trump has been so very, very silent on the Stormy issue speaks louder than anything he could say.

 

 

there is just the remotest of all possibilities trump and his team perceive north korean nuclear disarmament very slightly more important and pressing issue for the time being. lol

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/29/2018 at 8:04 PM, Jingthing said:

Yeah, sure, when in doubt make up a conspiracy theory. 

 

 

"Human beings, vegetables, or cosmic dust, we all dance to a mysterious tune intoned in the distance by an invisible player" .   this quote was one hell of a conspiracy theory

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Justfine said:
On 3/30/2018 at 12:49 PM, selftaopath said:

I'd bet more would rather have her as their Mother than him as their Dad.  He has absolutely NO redeeming qualities. 

 

 

He's rich.

 

 

money sure redeems a lot of expats in thailand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, atyclb said:

 

 

thats a matter the lawyers will figure out. seems a campaign contribution should go directly to a campaign and then if those officially earmarked funds go to pay "gag money" then it looks clearly as you say.     didn't a lawyer use his own money to pay daniels ?  

 

just my non lawyer ideas.

 

If Cohen used his own money, it’s still a campaign contributuion if it’s purpose was to benefit (or reduce harm to) the campaign. The amount also far exceeds the allowable amount of individual donations.

 

The timing makes it hard to argue that it wasn’t for the benefit of the campaign. So even if it was a Cohen’s personal money, even if it was declared in the campaign accounts, it’s still illegal because it far exceeds the allowable amount.

 

It doesn’t matter that Daniels is a “sleazy” prince star, or that she may be u  this for fame and fortune, or that her lawyer talks like a trollish thug, or that Cohen may be that illusive one in a billion lawyer who would spend his own money for a client. The only thing for a judge (in this case, the election commission) to consider is whether this was a campaign contribution.

 

Beyond that, and for a different judge to consider is whether the NDA is valid. If not, Daniels can sign book and movie deals. If it is, she has already broken it, but it seems she has something on Trump that gives her the confidence that as long as she doesn’t cross a line we don’t know about, he will not go after her.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, atyclb said:

 

if true trump raped a 15 year old then he should be tried and imprisoned

Sadly that is not true.................she was 13, the other was 12. The rape of the one at 13 was witnessed by the adult female who "sourced" the child. She is incidental willing to testify buy the woman that was the child has been subject to threats according to her lawyer.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Andaman Al said:

Yes, they seem to have arguments like ....'but but but Mary was very young when she had her baby...and it doesn't mention about minimum age in the bible as long as they are old enough to bleed.....and it says in the bible we must forgive peoples sins..unless they are democrats or black or gay, or against the second amendment or Hilary".

 

This Presidency has really muted the evangelical leaders for what they are... more conmen from the swamp.

I hope the evangelicals are scorned throughout the world for their beliefs.

evangelical hypocrisy.jpg

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thakkar said:

 

But not as pressing as taunting the new host of The Apprentice for its lower ratings than when Trump was hosting.

 

perhaps but i wouldnt know. got better things to do than obsessively follow the circus in preparation for tv forum debate

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, atyclb said:

imo  the monica lewinski clinton scandal was an equal waste of time and money

my response was about a post saying stormy was tainted by the likes of trump sex encounter but she has performed with a multitude of male porn actors and not too many of them are arkansas lawyers and rhodes scholars 

if true trump raped a 15 year old then he should be tried and imprisoned

 

16 hours ago, Andaman Al said:

Sadly that is not true.................she was 13, the other was 12. The rape of the one at 13 was witnessed by the adult female who "sourced" the child. She is incidental willing to testify buy the woman that was the child has been subject to threats according to her lawyer.

I heard there were 2 girls, both age 14.  One, named Maria, was never heard from again. It's common for kid rapists to threaten a victim with: "If you tell anyone about this, you and your family will be killed."  It's possible that threat was followed up.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...