Watchdog opposes easing of licence payment terms for mobile operators

By SIRIVISH TOOMGUM 
THE NATION

 

 

AN ANTI-GRAFT watchdog yesterday asked the government not to grant controversial requests by two major mobile-phone network operators for easing of licence upfront payments.

 

The Anti-Corruption Organisation of Thailand (ACT) said it shared a common view with scholars and certain social elements that there are no good reasons to justify government aid. The government would better seek a resolution on this issue through the National Legislative Assembly, it suggested.

 

Advanced Wireless Network (AWN) and True Move H Universal Communication (TUC), in separate requests to the junta last September, sought ways to allow them to divide the final instalments of the 900MHz spectrum licence upfront fees into seven tranches.

 

Also yesterday, True Corp – the parent of TUC – met with the press for the first time regarding the matter. True defended its request for government aid, insisting that its request would not hurt the public’s interest.

 

ACT said yesterday that if the junta wanted to assist any parties by invoking its special powers under Article 44 of the interim charter, which is also allowed under the new Constitution, it must be in the public interest.

 

AWN and TUC are scheduled to pay the hefty final instalments of Bt59.574 billion and Bt60.218 billion, respectively, in 2020.

 

The junta had consulted the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) on the two operators’ requests.

 

The NBTC recommended that they should be allowed to split the final instalment payment into between three and five tranches and that they should also pay interest of just 1.5 per cent per annum, based on the Bank of Thailand’s policy rate.

 

The proposal has drawn opposition from many people, including Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI) president Somkiat Tangkitvanich. He said the government and regulators should hold firm against their requests, as such a concession would benefit only the operators and not the country.

 

NBTC secretary-general Takorn Tantasith yesterday strongly dismissed a widespread perception that the agency initiated the move to help the two operators. He said it is the two operators that requested the junta directly and that it is beyond the NBTC’s authority to grant their requests regarding licence-fee payments.

 

True Group’s co-president, Vichaow Rakphongphairoj said yesterday that in 2016 the digital TV licence holders asked for government relief measures to ease their financial burden, given their final licence bidding price was about two times higher than the starting bid price.

 

True views that the company could make a similar request, given that the average final bid price of the 900MHz licences is around six times higher than the starting price.

 

He insisted that True’s request would not affect the state coffers. Under the request, the company has still continued to pay the instalments plus an interest rate. Importantly it has placed all the required bank guarantees at the NBTC for all instalment payments. He denied that this request would amount to the company  failing to pay the instalments on their due dates.

 

He added that the company will respect a final decision by the junta. But if the easing of payment schedule is not granted, the company might experience possible difficulty, or higher costs, to enter the upcoming auction of new spectrum licences and to spend on the development of new wireless technologies. If so, this could affect the country's progress accordingly, he warned.

 

However, it is its executive board that will make a final decision if the company participates in the next licence auction, he said.

 

Last Thursday, both TUC and AWN separately issued press releases saying that easing of the schedule would save them capital that could be spent on network expansion and the development of advanced telecommunications services and technologies, which would help in the country’s progress.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/business/30342855

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-04-10

1 hour ago, webfact said:

True views that the company could make a similar request, given that the average final bid price of the 900MHz licences is around six times higher than the starting price.

thai logic, if you bought something and you Knew that you were paying 6x, would you both buy it and then ask for government relief ?!; idiots

1 hour ago, webfact said:

ACT said yesterday that if the junta wanted to assist any parties by invoking its special powers under Article 44 of the interim charter, which is also allowed under the new Constitution, it must be in the public interest.

Try as I might, I just see this story as another example of corporate whores begging the government for money. They are 'world-class' companies, or so we are told, who signed a deal and now are asking for their terms to be eased.

 

If I enter a business deal and it doesn't work out perfectly for me, then the government isn't going to help me; why should the government help them? 

 

Pay the money owed, ya deadbeats! 

 

 

I have no sympathy for AIS or True. If they have over extended themselves out is due v to their managerial incompetence and the public should not bail them out in any way. They have vast resources and any suggestion that future investment in upcoming spectrum auctions might be prejuduced is naive in the extreme. Rather b than look for financial relief they should learn to curb their impetuous spending at auctions. Dtac did not get sucked into overpayment because it knows the dangers of profligacy.

 

I am a customer of both Dtac and True, and have great respect for the former because it delivers unobtrusive and good service. True on the other hand is a constant source of irritation because it's staff cannot cope and it uses cheap and nasty equipment that is not up to the job. Give me dependable competence rather than flashy overpromises!

All part of a bigger plan.....To get DTAC (foreign owned) off the market...

To allow True and AIS delaying their payments, they will have enough cash to pay stupid prices at the next license auction....leaving DTAC without a license....Mission accomplished....

And as far as I know...True and AIS didn't even ask for the extended credit....The Supreme Savior just decided to use art 44 as the magic wand...

 

54 minutes ago, JOC said:

 

And as far as I know...True and AIS didn't even ask for the extended credit....The Supreme Savior just decided to use art 44 as the magic wand...

 

 

 

JOG better learn to read, its been in previous articles too the supreme savior was not the one that suggested this, the companies did.

 

Like you I am of course against it but I don't need to embellish the truth. 

 

Also yesterday, True Corp – the parent of TUC – met with the press for the first time regarding the matter. True defended its request for government aid, insisting that its request would not hurt the public’s interest.

Big company get money from government. Little people don't get money from government.

Same same every time!