Jump to content

Russia ran U.S. election interference, no Trump collusion - panel Republicans


rooster59

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, mikebike said:

Of course, she's a politician, would never lie, wouldn't have ANYTHING to do with keeping' the US$$$ flowing into SK... Nah, couldn't be!!

 

There's the problem with you guys....you believe nothing that you don't want to believe/doesn't suit your agenda.   If she'd said that he had nothing to do with KJU's changed position, you'd be all over her like a bad suit, saying what a great politician she was.   

 

Hillary Clinton was a politician before the4 election....Trump wasn't a politician before the election, so it follows that she lied, but he didn't, exactly the opposite of what you're propagating elsewhere!!!   Joke!

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, F4UCorsair said:

 

There's the problem with you guys....you believe nothing that you don't want to believe/doesn't suit your agenda.   If she'd said that he had nothing to do with KJU's changed position, you'd be all over her like a bad suit, saying what a great politician she was.   

 

Hillary Clinton was a politician before the4 election....Trump wasn't a politician before the election, so it follows that she lied, but he didn't, exactly the opposite of what you're propagating elsewhere!!!   Joke!

My opinion has always been that both H and 45 are liars.

 

If being a politician = being a liar, logically it does not follow that all non-politicians are not liars. Clearly many NYC developers are liars, just like politicians.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, F4UCorsair said:

 

There's the problem with you guys....you believe nothing that you don't want to believe/doesn't suit your agenda.   If she'd said that he had nothing to do with KJU's changed position, you'd be all over her like a bad suit, saying what a great politician she was.   

 

Hillary Clinton was a politician before the4 election....Trump wasn't a politician before the election, so it follows that she lied, but he didn't, exactly the opposite of what you're propagating elsewhere!!!   Joke!

Given Trump's endless appetite for flattery, and his propensity to shoot off his mouth in anger, it doesn't seem unreasonable to assume that the minister was engaged in flattery. Especially given that nothing concrete has been signed off on yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, roobaa01 said:

1. who arranged for peace on the korean peninsula ???

2. who is meeting uniquely in us modern history a north korean leader

3. who is kicking middle eastern poltician bumps

4. who is giving the us taxpayer money back

5. who makes the us economy thriving

6. who kicks deep state bumps

 

it is the ultimate mr. donald trump who will serve a second term.

 

wbr roobaa01

Here some more questions for you:

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/us/politics/questions-mueller-wants-to-ask-trump-russia.html

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, roobaa01 said:

obama sold us national security issues to iran, president trump needs to clean obama's mess up.

 

@FritsSikkink ny times, washington post are biased mainstream medias as well as mueller is. hence comments are useless.

 

wbr

roobaa01

That is what Nixon said too before he got kicked out of the office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mikebike said:

My opinion has always been that both H and 45 are liars.

 

If being a politician = being a liar, logically it does not follow that all non-politicians are not liars. Clearly many NYC developers are liars, just like politicians.

But you didn't address the highlighted part......

 

There's the problem with you guys....you believe nothing that you don't want to believe/doesn't suit your agenda.   If she'd said that he had nothing to do with KJU's changed position, you'd be all over her like a bad suit, saying what a great politician she was.   

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, F4UCorsair said:

But you didn't address the highlighted part......

 

There's the problem with you guys....you believe nothing that you don't want to believe/doesn't suit your agenda.   If she'd said that he had nothing to do with KJU's changed position, you'd be all over her like a bad suit, saying what a great politician she was.   

I didn't address that directly because I see no situation where the FM would say that. Even if it were true there is no value for a FM to state it publicly. BUT if what she did state publicly was true or not it serves a powerful purpose for her as FM.

 

I don't know her but she seems to be a competent FM in her handling of this.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...