scorecard Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 21 minutes ago, simple1 said: As an example additional funding for NewStart was not provided in the 2019 budget, even though most Australians would consider the current rates appallingly low. Same with the very aggressive payment reductions if someone on an Age Pension has a partner who is working. One would really struggle day to day if no access to additional funds for whatever reasons e.g. investment failure / fraud. Don't recall the detail, but there have been a number of attempts by the Liberals to make life harder for pensioners and others which Labor have managed to block during the course of Liberal governments since Abbott came to power. You may be interested in the Liberal's 2019 policy plan. https://www.liberal.org.au/our-plan Thanks, all very interesting, my main interest is a report (1 year ago, not sure) that the DVA (Dept., of Veteran Affairs) would be disbanded and their remit be dovetailed into Centrelink. Apparently it's up for a major decision coming soon. Like it or not, and some non-vets don't, veterans receive a lot of care and support from the DVA (I know, I'm one of them), and any suggestion that it be disbanded is frightening to say the least. Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 11 hours ago, scorecard said: Do the libs have a stated agenda to reduce welfare, anything specific stated? Serious question. If anything they have increased welfare even further for retirees by proposing that those aged 66 & 67 even if not working can add more money to their superannuation Link to comment
simple1 Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 28 minutes ago, ThaiBunny said: If anything they have increased welfare even further for retirees by proposing that those aged 66 & 67 even if not working can add more money to their superannuation You're talking to personal funds, not Welfare. Personally wasn't aware one was previously blocked from routing funds from other investments into Super based upon age. 1 Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 45 minutes ago, simple1 said: You're talking to personal funds, not Welfare. Personally wasn't aware one was previously blocked from routing funds from other investments into Super based upon age. You can't contribute to superannuation unless you're working. This proposal changes that test Link to comment
simple1 Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, ThaiBunny said: You can't contribute to superannuation unless you're working. This proposal changes that test OK, but more clarification on criteria below, not as black and white as you infer. https://www.afr.com/personal-finance/superannuation-and-smsfs/do-you-need-to-work-to-contribute-to-super-20190122-h1achv 1 Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, simple1 said: OK, but more clarification on criteria below, not as black and white as you infer. https://www.afr.com/personal-finance/superannuation-and-smsfs/do-you-need-to-work-to-contribute-to-super-20190122-h1achv I imply, you infer Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 Here's a full electorate-by-electorate guide https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal/2019/guide/electorates Link to comment
Popular Post Bagwain Posted April 13, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 13, 2019 20 hours ago, Will27 said: I'll vote for any party who promises to abolish the 2 year waiting period for the OAP if you return from overseas and want to return back overseas The 2 yr rule is just plain wrong. They have increased my retirement age to 67. So if I go back to Oz at 65 go on the dole & get the pension at 67 I am OK to come back to LOS. However you can't qualify here on the Oz pension anyway. Australia is somewhere near the bottom of the list of pension payments in the world and people living under the poverty line. Lucky country my Ar*e!! 3 Link to comment
Nemises Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 ^ Going back for the dole? Then you may be happy to know that Shorten says (in today’s AU papers) that he’ll bump up the dole by $75 a week, plus index it to wages. 2 Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 Just now, Nemises said: ^ Going back for the dole? Then you may be happy to know that Shorten says (in today’s AU papers) that he’ll bump up the dole by $75 a week, plus index it to wages. Any link? Link to comment
Nemises Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 Page 4 of today’s Sydney Daily Telegraph. Let me know if you can’t find a link as I can copy and paste the text from the newspaper. Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 8 minutes ago, Nemises said: Page 4 of today’s Sydney Daily Telegraph. Let me know if you can’t find a link as I can copy and paste the text from the newspaper. Yes thanks, I'd be very interested to read the full article Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 Oh you mean this story - https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/labor-leader-bill-shorten-vows-to-raise-the-newstart-allowance-rate-and-backs-his-tax-agenda/news-story/83a74cb2e49d74b33ab30e8277821ae5? Shorten says it needs to be raised. Quite separately the Australian Council of Social Services give an example of what a rise of $75 "would mean". Shorten's promising nothing except a review Link to comment
Nemises Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 My paper says he has “vowed to raise”, it doesn’t say “needs to be raised”. Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Nemises said: My paper says he has “vowed to raise”, it doesn’t say “needs to be raised”. "Vowed to raise" or "Needs to be raised" - there's no figure given. You're confusing what he's promised to do with a completely different organisation hypothesising about what the raise might be Edited April 13, 2019 by ThaiBunny Link to comment
Nemises Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 "Vowed to raise" or "Needs to be raised" - there's no figure given. You're confusing what he's promised to do with a completely different organisation hypothesising about what the raise might beGood you now agree with me that he has “vowed to raise”. $75pw was mentioned in the same newspaper article, but who knows exactly how much it will be. Bottom line is that it may be good news if going back to AU for the dole - as I stated in a previous post. Have a good day. Time for prepare for Winx’s last race! Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 Just now, Nemises said: Good you now agree with me that he has “vowed to raise”. Yes, I give up, you win Link to comment
rhodie Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 (edited) Has anyone applied for an O-A visa from the Sydney Consulate recently? Getting ready to do my second one and it has changed a bit. Main change seems it does not require a medical certificate. And now costs AUD$550. I'm sure I paid AUD$225 2 years ago. Edited April 15, 2019 by rhodie Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, rhodie said: Has anyone applied for an O-A visa from the Sydney Consulate recently? Getting ready to do my second one and it has changed a bit. Main change seems it does not require a medical certificate. And now costs AUD$550. I'm sure I paid AUD$225 2 years ago. Both the Sydney & Canberra consulates quote $275 - not sure where you're seeing $550. The Sydney consulate doesn't list a medical certificate and now wants only one copy and one set of originals, The Canberra consulate (yes, I know it's part of the Embassy), still wants a medical certificate and still wants two copies and one set of originals. Go figure http://www.thaiembassy.org/sydney/en/other/96010-NON-IMMIGRANT-VISA.html http://canberra.thaiembassy.org/Home/visa Edited April 15, 2019 by ThaiBunny Link to comment
rhodie Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 4 hours ago, ThaiBunny said: Both the Sydney & Canberra consulates quote $275 - not sure where you're seeing $550. The Sydney consulate doesn't list a medical certificate and now wants only one copy and one set of originals, The Canberra consulate (yes, I know it's part of the Embassy), still wants a medical certificate and still wants two copies and one set of originals. Go figure http://www.thaiembassy.org/sydney/en/other/96010-NON-IMMIGRANT-VISA.html http://canberra.thaiembassy.org/Home/visa Not going to argue, and I hope you are right, but.. Note the last entry on the latest form. $275 for ME, which I assume is 6 months. "Retirement only" $550. Before 6 month and OA were $225. The old form below. Note $225 and that was for 1 year too. As I say, I hope you are right. Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Interesting disconnect between what's on one page and another. Moral of the story - lodge via Canberra Link to comment
rhodie Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 2 hours ago, ThaiBunny said: Interesting disconnect between what's on one page and another. Moral of the story - lodge via Canberra OK, so here is the Canberra form. As with everything Thailand, nothing is ever logical or straight forward. There is a download link specifically for retirees "Visa application form for retirees". Not sure when you did your application, but I suspect it is now AUD$550 even in Canberra. Seems correct as I remember reading an American posting a price of US$400 for the OA there. Link to comment
ubonjoe Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 The fee for a OA visa is 275 AUD. The 550 AUD is for a non-ox visa that is valid for up to 10 years (two 5 year visas). 1 1 Link to comment
Nemises Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 The 2 yr rule is just plain wrong. They have increased my retirement age to 67. So if I go back to Oz at 65 go on the dole & get the pension at 67 I am OK to come back to LOS. However you can't qualify here on the Oz pension anyway. Australia is somewhere near the bottom of the list of pension payments in the world...As I previously mentioned, the ALP have “vowed” to raise the dole if elected next week. Unions and the Australian Council of Social Service want a weekly $75 increase to the fortnightly rate. Link to comment
moojar Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 (edited) Cannot qualify to live in Thailand on the Oz pension coz the AUD is so abysmally low. Tipped to go lower too - RBA are going to have to cut the official interest rate; NZ have already done so. And if China calls Trump's 'art of the deal' bluff and they go full-out trade war, we'll be back to calling the AUD 'the south pacific peso' IMO. On the election, this handy 'smart vote' tool helps identify who you might want to vote for - I've used it for the Senate, I'd love to see some maverick independent representing my state so we get lots of money thrown at us, like Tasmania keeps managing to do. https://australia.smartvote.org/en/home (Love how there's an 'EN' - English - specific URL helping you vote in an Australian election!) Tried looking up the "manifestos" of the independents in my state, about half of them have nothing published that I can find. Why bother nominating, what chance anyone will vote for you? Edited May 10, 2019 by moojar Link to comment
moojar Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 1 hour ago, moojar said: Cannot qualify to live in Thailand on the Oz pension coz the AUD is so abysmally low. Tipped to go lower too - RBA are going to have to cut the official interest rate; NZ have already done so. And if China calls Trump's 'art of the deal' bluff and they go full-out trade war, we'll be back to calling the AUD 'the south pacific peso' IMO. ABC analysis piece published this morning: Quote Reserve Bank rate cuts almost a certainty as it slashes economic outlook https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-10/future-interest-rate-cut-likely-rba-releases-economic-forecast/11095752 Link to comment
ThaiBunny Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 2 hours ago, moojar said: Cannot qualify to live in Thailand on the Oz pension coz the AUD is so abysmally low. The long-term average for the AUD vs THB is 25, with variations around 10% either way. It's currently just a tad below 22.5% so roughly 10% below its long term average. The full Australian single pension for those not resident in Australia is $843.60 plus $68.50 Supplement - $912.10 as at the latest increase. If you're not resident in Australia you're not entitled to the $14 Energy supplement At the average exchange rate you would get 22,800 baht per fortnight. At the current exchange rate you would get roughly 20,500 per fortnight. At best you could hope for 25,000 baht per fortnight. Basically you're saying that 10,000 baht per month (the difference between the maximum probable amount and the minimum probable amount) is what stands between you and "qualifying to live" in Thailand?? The maximum fortnightly amount is still only 50,000 baht for four weeks which if you make it a monthly amount, and 54,000 per calendar month if you apply the normal multiplier to change 4 weeks to calendar month. I understood the "qualification to live in Thailand" to be 65,000 baht per month. The pension amount itself, no matter what the exchange rate of AUD/THB, is what stands between you and being qualified to live in Thailand 2 Link to comment
Popular Post moojar Posted May 10, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted May 10, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, ThaiBunny said: The long-term average for the AUD vs THB is 25, with variations around 10% either way. It's currently just a tad below 22.5% so roughly 10% below its long term average. The full Australian single pension for those not resident in Australia is $843.60 plus $68.50 Supplement - $912.10 as at the latest increase. If you're not resident in Australia you're not entitled to the $14 Energy supplement At the average exchange rate you would get 22,800 baht per fortnight. At the current exchange rate you would get roughly 20,500 per fortnight. At best you could hope for 25,000 baht per fortnight. Basically you're saying that 10,000 baht per month (the difference between the maximum probable amount and the minimum probable amount) is what stands between you and "qualifying to live" in Thailand?? The maximum fortnightly amount is still only 50,000 baht for four weeks which if you make it a monthly amount, and 54,000 per calendar month if you apply the normal multiplier to change 4 weeks to calendar month. I understood the "qualification to live in Thailand" to be 65,000 baht per month. The pension amount itself, no matter what the exchange rate of AUD/THB, is what stands between you and being qualified to live in Thailand Did you get a special deal on question marks? AUD is more like 21.5 THB or less atm - Commonwealth Bank will sell you 21 THB per dollar, Bangkok Bank under 21.5. Even SuperRich's rate for cash is only 22.10. If you're going to get all pedantic about someone else's post, best to get your own ducks in a row first. I am not of pension age and won't use the 'monthly income' method to live in Thailand anyway. But I imagine those guys that do get a pension and have been in Thailand 10 years or less are getting a bit uncomfortable - we're a long way from the 31 THB or more we were enjoying not so many years ago. In much of those 10 years you would have enough 'monthly income', or been close to it, with the single pension. I assume that's where bagwain's comment comes from. On a married pension, you'd still just about scrape it in at the current exchange rate. I wouldn't hold my breathe waiting for an increase in the pension either - the younger generations that now control public opinion don't give a stuff about you or your difficulties living overseas. Edited May 10, 2019 by moojar spelling 2 1 Link to comment
LosLobo Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 7 hours ago, ThaiBunny said: The long-term average for the AUD vs THB is 25, with variations around 10% either way. It's currently just a tad below 22.5% so roughly 10% below its long term average. The full Australian single pension for those not resident in Australia is $843.60 plus $68.50 Supplement - $912.10 as at the latest increase. If you're not resident in Australia you're not entitled to the $14 Energy supplement At the average exchange rate you would get 22,800 baht per fortnight. At the current exchange rate you would get roughly 20,500 per fortnight. At best you could hope for 25,000 baht per fortnight. Basically you're saying that 10,000 baht per month (the difference between the maximum probable amount and the minimum probable amount) is what stands between you and "qualifying to live" in Thailand?? The maximum fortnightly amount is still only 50,000 baht for four weeks which if you make it a monthly amount, and 54,000 per calendar month if you apply the normal multiplier to change 4 weeks to calendar month. I understood the "qualification to live in Thailand" to be 65,000 baht per month. The pension amount itself, no matter what the exchange rate of AUD/THB, is what stands between you and being qualified to live in Thailand When overseas for more than six weeks or going overseas permanently AAP Supplement drops to $36.70. Therefore AAP is $880.30 for non residents. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now