Jump to content

Thai 20-year strategy 'at risk of being outdated'


webfact

Recommended Posts

Thai 20-year strategy 'at risk of being outdated'

By KAS CHANWANPEN, 
SUPALAK GANJANAKHUNDEE

THE NATION

 

832ff544a67838e24924984d3b56dede.jpeg

File Photo

 

THAILAND’S 20-year strategy will become obsolete once the US implements its new Indo-Pacific strategy and expands its role across the two oceans, notably on security matters, two prominent Thai scholars on security and military affairs said.

 

The national strategy on security approved by the National Legislative Assembly last month was unclear about how to deal with the new US strategy, said Chulalongkorn University security expert Surachart Bamrungsuk.

 

While US President Donald Trump’s strategy expands US power to cover the two oceans from Australia to India and perhaps east of Africa, the Thai strategy merely says the country would balance and engage all countries, notably the superpowers.

 

The junta’s strategy looks to the US as the main actor and attaches importance to BRICS – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – while also dealing from a security standpoint with the Islamic State (IS) terrorist organisation, he said. “We all known the US is there and security is important, but BRICS and IS are not relevant anymore,” he said.

 

Thailand needs to adjust its grand strategy to cope with new changes in global geopolitics, otherwise the country could lose its position in the international community, he said.

 

“Only an elected government with full mandate from the people can do it. The military government is not flexible enough to adjust its strategy and policy,” Surachart told The Nation. While Trump has mapped out his government’s strategy to counter China, Thai junta chief Prayut Chan-o-cha has repeatedly made it clear that the military government would go along with China, he said.

 

The position on leaning towards China is not a strategy, but more a reaction to the criticism by the Barack Obama administration after Prayut’s coup in 2014.

 

Thailand and the US have moved closer during Trump’s tenure. Prayut was welcomed to the White House in Washington and military-to-military ties have edged closer.

 

“I understand that Washington might be worried about the close ties between Thailand and China,” Surachart said. “It seems Thailand is now a part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” The military government is now the link between Thailand’s geography and China’s strategy, he said. “We have seen a strong push to build the Kra Isthmus Canal to complete China’s strategy of linking the Pacific and Indian oceans.”

 

Surachart said Washington needs to readjust its policy to push Thailand back to full democracy. “Of course, military-to-military engagement is necessary, and joint military exercises – bilateral or multilateral such as the Cobra Gold – should continue. But giving a red-carpet welcome to the leader of a military government is the wrong signal,” he said.

 

Piyaphob Mahamad, a military affairs expert from Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, said Thailand was continuing to do a great job in nurturing relations with the US despite the increasing influence of China in both the country and the region.

 

As full military exercises have resumed, high-ranking military officers from the US, in particular Joseph Dunford, have visited the country and chaired meetings of the chiefs of staff, he said. Dunford insisted that relations remained strong, as they have been since after World War II, said Piyaphob.

 

While Thailand – as a smaller country – seems to benefit from the military exercises, Piyaphob pointed out that there were many things in it for the US, too. Thailand’s varied terrain is great for war drills and is largely unmatched by other countries.

 

The Thai Army, however, has looked east in recent years, purchasing more weapons from China as it was cost effective. This has led to speculation about possible bigger and more frequent military exercises with China as well.

 

But Piyaphob said they could not match the multilateral US military exercises led by the US, while drills with China drills were significantly smaller and bilateral.

 

There could be increased procurement of Chinese hardware, he said, but opaque deals would make it hard to know how much had been spent from the Thai defence budget.

 

“Unlike procurement from the US, we would never know the real price of Chinese hardware,” he said. “More importantly, if we purchase more Chinese equipment till it dominates the weapon systems, I think the Thai military would need to change its defence doctrine to match the weapon systems being used,” he said.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30350659

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-07-24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, webfact said:

“Unlike procurement from the US, we would never know the real price of Chinese hardware,” he said. “More importantly, if we purchase more Chinese equipment till it dominates the weapon systems, I think the Thai military would need to change its defence doctrine to match the weapon systems being used,” he said.

To find out the cost of something, you open it up and look inside.  We know what steel costs in China as well as a tantalum capacitor.  You then combine that with the approximate costs of engineering and testing.   If you know the exact cost of the US product, you then have some basis for your approximations. 

 

Defense doctrine ?  The wrangling of those who wish to engage in debate and universal suffrage ?  Looking to violate a UN resolution to appropriate a Hindu Temple at the border ?  That would be bad for business.  Said border has a few "Thai" casinos. 

 

Mind numbing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DoctorG said:

Is it just the camera angle/depth, or is this guy 7 feet tall?

He’s a tall man indeed, but not seven feet...the four star general pictured was the most recent US Army Chief of Staff, GEN Ray Odierno, who was visiting Thailand when the photo was taken.  The current Chief is GEN Mark Milley.  

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DoctorG said:

Is it just the camera angle/depth, or is this guy 7 feet tall?

This photo is somewhat distorted, but in the original, which was in BK Post, the American is very damn tall.  Gen P's head barely came to the American's shoulder when they were standing close together.  I think it's a picture Gen P doesn't really like. lol

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Srikcir said:

What remains is whether the Thai people will now have the fortitude to break that cycle or continue to embrace it.

A rhetorical question, most certainly but also confusing with the words Thai and fortitude in the same sentence...

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Just1Voice said:

This photo is somewhat distorted, but in the original, which was in BK Post, the American is very damn tall.  Gen P's head barely came to the American's shoulder when they were standing close together.  I think it's a picture Gen P doesn't really like. lol

 

Very funny photo. Lots of symbolism of various kinds ...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good twenty year plan is a revolving, plan requiring minor adjustments as it goes along and major adjustments every five year.  Thailand needs to play the middle.  It can be the food basket of China and the only stable secure base for the U.S. in Southeast Asia.  Don't forget Japan, as it provides a good base for manufacturing with trained low cost workers in areas that Japan doesn't have the manpower to take care of.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, webfact said:

THAILAND’S 20-year strategy will become obsolete once the US implements its new Indo-Pacific strategy and expands its role across the two oceans, notably on security matters, two prominent Thai scholars on security and military affairs said.

That's making the assumption that the US Indo-Pac strategy will be more effective than China's control of the South China Sea couple their OBOR strategy.  This is now a rapidly evolving multipolar world.  But Thailand, being Thailand, will probably do what it has always done best - play the middle.

Edited by connda
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, liberty9133 said:

Thai Strategy must take note of what the International Globalist Establishment wants:The Establishment has deemed China the manufacturer to the world. Trump is opposing that. They want Trump out. Until it is clear who wins this battle, perhaps Thailand should take a wait and see position.

    I think that the American people are behind Trump and that might be sufficient for him to win in the end. However, the Establishment and its puppets are in full control of much of the US Government. If they succeed, Civil War in the US is likely. If the people succeed, then full steam ahead for the entire world!

 

HRC won the popular vote by 3 million so the "people" are definitively against the Swamp King currently infesting the WH. Civil war? A few potbellied NRA members won't be much of a challenge for the authorities and good riddance.

 

Back on topic:

Any 20 year strategy implemented by a military junta can and should be discarded as soon as free elections have been held. There will be opposition from the junta stacked senate but the new elected and legal government should play hardball and threaten to resign if blocked by the junta puppets in the senate.

With a fresh mandate from the electorate the old guard will hopefully back off (for now).

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Becker said:

There will be opposition from the junta stacked senate but the new elected and legal government should play hardball and threaten to resign if blocked by the junta puppets in the senate.

Do you think the "junta puppets" would be concerned by a threat of resignation? NO!

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the rapidly shifting world of global geopolitics it is inconceivable that any 20 year strategic plan would remain meaningful for very long, unless there is unlimited wiggle room to modify it.  Here we have a 20 year plan put together by people who have a poor track record of planning things a few weeks in advance domestically and a very limited understanding of global political economy.  Look what happened with the decree on the Working of Aliens that caused a massive exodus of migrant labour bring Thai businesses to a standstill, requiring a second decree to drastically amend it. 

 

In addition, the planners have failed to use their unlimited power to do anything about corruption, so it is hard to imagine that elected governments with limited powers and hogtied by this plan and the constitution will be able to uproot corruption which is the single greatest evil in Thailand that cripples social, political and economic development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lvr181 said:

Do you think the "junta puppets" would be concerned by a threat of resignation? NO!

If the future legally elected government got a very clear mandate by the electorate I don't think they will have a choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...