Jump to content

Special counsel protection bill stalls in U.S. Senate, Flake starts protest


webfact

Recommended Posts

Special counsel protection bill stalls in U.S. Senate, Flake starts protest

By Lisa Lambert

 

2018-11-29T055839Z_1_LYNXNPEEAS0BE_RTROPTP_4_SAUDI-KHASHOGGI-SENATE.JPG

Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ) speaks to the media after a closed briefing for senators about the latest developments related to the death of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., November 28, 2018. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Legislation to protect the special counsel's office probe into possible Russian election interference stalled in the U.S. Senate on Wednesday, spurring Republican Senator Jeff Flake to make good on his threat of opposing judicial nominations until the bill moves forward.

 

Fellow Republican Vice President Mike Pence was called in as president of the Senate to break a tie vote on advancing Thomas Farr's nomination as a U.S. district judge in North Carolina, after Flake voted "no."

 

Flake is a strong advocate for the protection bill, known as the Special Counsel Independence and Integrity Act, which would make it harder for President Donald Trump to undermine the investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

 

The measure has already been approved at the committee level with support from both parties.

 

Trump has called Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe, which is also looking into possible collusion between Moscow and Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, a witch hunt. Russia denies interfering in the 2016 election and Trump has denied any collusion occurred.

 

Speaking to reporters earlier on Wednesday, Flake, who is retiring soon, said he believed the bill could pass but that he had been told "somebody will block it."

 

"So my commitment to not vote for judges before the committee or on the floor until we get this done stands," Flake said.

 

Shortly afterward, Republican Senator Mike Lee took to the floor to block the bill, saying it went against the U.S. Constitution and gave the special counsel's office too much power, "creating a de facto fourth branch of government."

 

Flake in turn put the Farr nomination in jeopardy, creating a tie with his vote.

 

Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, canceled a meeting of the panel set for Thursday. A brief statement by the committee did not give a reason for the cancellation.

 

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell had said on Tuesday he would "probably" block a renewed effort to bring the special counsel protection bill to a vote, calling it "a solution in search of a problem." 

 

With Republicans holding a slim majority in the Senate, Trump's nominees should win approval without much resistance.

 

Farr already faced a tough time, however, with moderate and liberal progressive groups objecting to his positions on civil rights. As a lawyer for North Carolina in 2014 he defended the state's voter registration law, which civil rights groups said intentionally suppressed minority votes.

 

(Reporting by Lisa Lambert; ddditional reporting by Susan Heavey and Susan Cornwell; Editing by James Dalgleish and Peter Cooney)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-11-29
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 11/29/2018 at 2:21 PM, Boon Mee said:

The "special council" is nothing but a cooked-up Witch Hunt which needs to be shut down now before it wastes more taxpayers money 

The special council is currently in profit (only special council ever to achieve that?) after confiscation of Manafort’s tax-evading ill-gotten gains.

 

For a witch hunt, it has indicted 26 Russians, convicted and jailed Trump’s campaign chair, jailed a foreign policy advisor, got guilty pleas from Trump’s national security advisor, deputy campaign chair (and chair of his presidentail inaugural committee), got guilty plea from Trump’s long time personal lawyer who has named Trump a co-conspirator and got guilty pleas from at least two other campaign operatives.

 

Trump himself has dutifully sent written answers to Mueller’s questions. Becuase even though he says it’s a witch hunt, he knows it isn’t—hence the dutiful submission of the answers.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Witch hunt?  Innocent people do not plead guilty.

There was talk of pardons from day one, which is an admission of guilt, as someone who is not guilty would not need a pardon.  Innocent people say "there was no wrongdoing, and the jury will see that."  Never heard that from these guys.

If someone is constantly declaring "there was no crime!" it's a pretty clear signal that any rookie cop or elementary school teacher can figure out.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2018 at 2:21 AM, Boon Mee said:

The "special council" is nothing but a cooked-up Witch Hunt which needs to be shut down now before it wastes more taxpayers money 

Yes indeed why do we need the special council wasting taxpayer money when we have Trump for that.  

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sirineou said:
  On 11/29/2018 at 2:21 AM, Boon Mee said:

The "special council" is nothing but a cooked-up Witch Hunt which needs to be shut down now before it wastes more taxpayers money 

 

6 minutes ago, sirineou said:

Yes indeed why do we need the special council wasting taxpayer money when we have Trump for that.

There is opinion,( everybody has one , like the proverbial bodily orifice.) And then there are facts.  

"The special counsel’s office is officially budgeted for $10.4 million in direct costs for fiscal year 2018 "

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/may/23/donald-trump/mueller-probe-costing-20-million-donald-trump-says/

 

"During his first 13 months in office, Trump flew down to his Mar-a-Lago resort 13 times. Those flights alone cost $27 million."

https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-career/trumps-56-million-in-golf-trips-cost-by-extravagant-cost.html/

 

Since Boon is worried about expenses, How about we get rid of Trump,

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""