Jump to content

Prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee for documents


webfact

Recommended Posts

Prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee for documents

 

2019-02-05T012414Z_1_LYNXNPEF1403X_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP.JPG

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting to "discuss fighting human trafficking on the southern border" in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., February 1, 2019. REUTERS/Jim Young

 

NEW YORK (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's inaugural committee said it had received a subpoena on Monday for documents from the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, which is investigating the group.

 

"We have just received a subpoena for documents. While we are still reviewing the subpoena, it is our intention to cooperate with the inquiry," a spokesperson for the committee said in a statement.

 

The subpoena requests documents related to the committee's donors and spending, the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times reported.

 

In December, the Journal reported that federal prosecutors were investigating whether the inaugural committee misspent some of the record $107 million it had raised from donors.

 

The investigation is examining whether some of the committee's donors gave money in exchange for policy concessions, influencing administration positions or access to the incoming administration, the Journal reported.

 

Prosecutors also showed interest in whether any foreigners illegally donated to the committee, the New York Times reported. Federal law prohibits foreign contributions to inaugural funds.

 

A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan declined to comment to Reuters.

 

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

Although campaign finance laws restrict the size of campaign contributions, inaugurations can accept unlimited donations, including from corporations. The amount raised by Trump's inaugural committee, chaired by real estate developer and investor Thomas Barrack, was the largest in history, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

 

(Reporting by Nathan Layne; Editing by Sandra Maler)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-02-05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The investigation is examining whether some of the committee's donors gave money in exchange for policy concessions, influencing administration positions or access to the incoming administration. ,,,,,, Will they be have a chat with the Clintons about the clinton foundation and all the lobby firms in DC.?

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jamesy9368 said:

The investigation is examining whether some of the committee's donors gave money in exchange for policy concessions, influencing administration positions or access to the incoming administration. ,,,,,, Will they be have a chat with the Clintons about the clinton foundation and all the lobby firms in DC.?

Well, as she has not been elected, all that remains quite hypothetical. In the case of Trump, it may be possible to check if they got something in exchange for their funding.

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Donald you can’t skim like one of your failed casinos it’s kinda like money laundering for the Russian federation it’s illegal as hell fed and state you are in deep deep you know what!oh there is a real good chance you and your older kids will get there own private wall 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Would taste better if they also went after Democrats and Republicans with the same zeal.

 

Lesson to be learned - anyone or anything using democrat or democracy in their title usually wants to apply the law to others rather than themselves!

 

Perhaps the prosecutorial interest -- apart from the fact that everyone connected with Trump and Trump himself have clear and blatant disregard for any laws that would hinder their worst instincts -- has something to do with the following:

 

Quote

The amount raised by Trump's inaugural committee, chaired by real estate developer and investor Thomas Barrack, was the largest in history, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The House Intelligence Committee is preparing to send Mueller formal copies of all testimony given under oath to the House’s ‘Russian Interference’ investigation.

 

Mueller already has informal records, he needs the ‘formal official’ records to place indictments before the courts.

 

Devin Nunes is no longer in a position to run distraction missions for Trump with testimony given to the committee and Trey Gowdy has run to hide in the bushes.

 

Illiberals get your denial glasses on, the truth will (despite Individual-1’s best efforts) out!

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, billd766 said:

That may be a bit tricky. He died 86 years ago.

 

Born: March 24, 1887, Smith Center, Kansas, United States

Died: June 29, 1933, Manhattan, New York City, New York, United States

I know that. My point was that an innocent man was convicted because the system was rigged.

  • Confused 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...