Mueller submits Trump-Russia inquiry report to U.S. attorney general

[riclag]

10 minutes ago, attrayant said:

 

Then I suggest you direct your bile at those people.  Until we have Mueller's findings, I am content to rest my case on the prima facie evidence.  And unlike you, I am not going to blind myself to Trump's other numerous acts of malfeasance.

 That is the current evidence  of ,No collusion and no Americans or his people have been indicted for this Russian non sense!

[Farangwithaplan]

11 minutes ago, Nyezhov said:

Nope. And I wont stop until someone gives me the answer to the question...where is the collusion?

 

And until that is shown, it would seem that the folks claiming that there was collusion are liars. Stone cold liars.

 

So again, I direct the question to you and your childish avatar...where is the collusion?

 

 

The point is that whatever the report states, is that there were discussions with other nations by Trumps team. That has been established. Some of those team lied about the meetings. That in itself is justification to investigate the claims further. The investigation has since found other lies from Trump leadership team. It would have been a dereliction of duty to not investigate further. It is disturbing that people within arm's reach all ending up in legal strife can be so closely associated with such an office of power.

 

To my mind, the thinking here is that the law and the credibility of the US legal and political systems is paramount. If Trump and his team were confident they had done nothing wrong, why didn't they just let justice take it's due course?

 

A lot of issues found during this investigation were outside the scope of the Mueller investigation. These issues have been handed over to other authorities to continue the trails.

 

It will be interesting to see whether there was any findings noted in the report, and if there were findings, how they are presented. Will the report be aiming for a quick response or will the report writer be looking at the long game?

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, Nyezhov said:

Wheres the collusion y'all have been yelling about? *crickets*

Do a search on the word "collusion" and see which side uses it the most.  Trump and the Trumpies have been yelling "no collusion" repeatedly, often when it had nothing to do with the subject at hand.  People who want the corrupt and incompetent con man out of the White House have used the term sparingly.

[Becker]

17 minutes ago, MAGA 2020 said:

And the tears continue to fall.....lol

I love the sound of liberal tears in the mornings 

Wow, the way you cleverly used that quote from Apocalypse Now in your post - amazing!

The stable genius sure does attract some impressive followers.

[Nyezhov]

6 minutes ago, Farangwithaplan said:

The point is that whatever the report states, is that there were discussions with other nations by Trumps team. That has been established.

So what?

 

Where is the collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians to interfere in the election?

 

*crickets*

[heybruce]

54 minutes ago, Nyezhov said:

Yep. We elected him. And we will again. 

 

But call him stupid? OK.  He has a billion dollars. How much do you have?

 

And Im sure he is a "misogynist". I am too. I use  the ladies for my own filthy and degrading pleasure. Why just last night.....

 

How about you, ever been to Pattaya?

You think it takes intelligence to inherit money?

 

Analysts have taken best guesses at Trump's secretive finances and determined that his net worth has increased slightly less than it would have if he had put his inheritance into an S&P 500 index fund.  Index funds are no-brainer funds that track the market.  So as a businessman, Trump is slightly less intelligent than a no-brainer.

[xylophone]

20 minutes ago, Nyezhov said:

Ah yes the ad hominems again.

Not exactly as YOU have already stated that you support and admire him and thereby his traits, so by your own admission you leave yourself open to such comments. It follows logic.

[heybruce]

44 minutes ago, MAGA 2020 said:

And in other News, the real investigation into the crimes committed under Hussein Obama and the Clinton crime syndicate are soon to follow.

Your imaginary crimes are off-topic.

[Farangwithaplan]

7 minutes ago, Nyezhov said:

So what?

 

Where is the collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians to interfere in the election?

 

*crickets*

Did you actually read my post? Because from your post I am really starting to question your ability to comprehend English.

 

I have no idea if there was 'collusion' or not. But neither do you. The findings have not been released. There are *crickets* because the only sane and logical thing to do it wait until the report is released to a wider audience.

 

So are you saying that even though some of Trump's team members were found to have lied about business dealing for multi million dollar property development under oath, lied about getting access to stolen emails from a person in office and other indiscretions, was not grounds to investigate further?

 

 

Edited March 24, 2019 by Farangwithaplan
added and typo

[Nyezhov]

2 minutes ago, Farangwithaplan said:

So are you saying that even though some of Trump's team members were found to have lied about business dealing for multi million dollar property development under oath, lied about getting access to stolen emails from a person in office and other indiscretions, was not grounds to investigate further?

Post hoc ergo propter hoc.

[Nyezhov]

9 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Analysts have taken best guesses at Trump's secretive finances and determined that his net worth has increased slightly less than it would have if he had put his inheritance into an S&P 500 index fund.  Index funds are no-brainer funds that track the market.  So as a businessman, Trump is slightly less intelligent than a no-brainer.

Best guess lol. Un named analysts. OK

 

8 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Your imaginary crimes are off-topic.

Actually, not, who knows what will be in the report? ????

10 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Not exactly as YOU have already stated that you support and admire him and thereby his traits, so by your own admission you leave yourself open to such comments. It follows logic.

Ah I see. Deplorables. 

 

[Farangwithaplan]

2 minutes ago, Nyezhov said:

Post hoc ergo propter hoc.

Do you understand the meaning of the latin you just wrote. By writing it it shows you do not. No fallacy at all. It would be remiss of the authorities to not to investigate further. That is the way western law works, generally speaking.

 

Anyway, you have proved yourself to be a person not fit for any more retorts due to your slogans and inability to talk rationally on this discussion. You get no more of my time.

 

[Nyezhov]

4 minutes ago, Farangwithaplan said:

You get no more of my time.

*crickets*

 

Another one who cant back it up.

[Opl]

2 hours ago, Nyezhov said:

Which ones? Show me one person who has been found to have "colluded" with Russia in conjunction with Presdient Trump.

[Farangwithaplan]

14 minutes ago, Nyezhov said:

*crickets*

 

Another one who cant back it up.

I don't need to. There are people in jail and pending court over the matter. Your trolling or pure incompetence knows no bounds.

 

This time *blocked*

Edited March 24, 2019 by Farangwithaplan
typo

[Nyezhov]

4 minutes ago, Opl said:

whats the point of that then?

[Opl]

1 minute ago, Nyezhov said:

whats the point of that then?

simple, you asked for names Trump can pardon since there is no collusion  

[Lacessit]

2 hours ago, Nyezhov said:

You mean fake news and fair an balanced? Both. I even read the NY Times and the Guardian, both of which are best for lining the bottom of a bird cage. I read it all as I enjoy my carefully brewed cup of single origina Doi Chan coffee sweetened with just a dollop of Condensed Milk. So no need to be confused, I have it handled.

 

I despise all politicians too, and Donald Trump is no exception. But Im sort of stuck defending him because he too is a victim. Civil Liberties are civil liberties, and fair is fair.

A billionaire is a victim? Well, I suppose James Packer is a fairly unhappy camper, so it just shows money doesn't always work.

BTW, the Doi Chang in CM and CR is served with real milk and real sugar. Heaven knows what your condensed milk comes from.

[Nyezhov]

2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

A billionaire is a victim? Well, I suppose James Packer is a fairly unhappy camper, so it just shows money doesn't always work.

Correct: Anybody can be a victim of .gov. Money or not.

 

3 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

BTW, the Doi Chang in CM and CR is served with real milk and real sugar. Heaven knows what your condensed milk comes from.

Milk in coffee is something that the lower classes drink, I figured it would be number 1 in CM. Ill take the ersatz condensed "milk" here until get the real stuff back in the Goodold.

[chokrai]

2 hours ago, xylophone said:

Why? It has already been proven that he is a serial liar, a cheat, a draft dodger, a racist, a misogynist, an adulterer and a person of low intelligence.............

 

Perhaps that's the sort of president you guys like??

Better then Hillary or Obama or any other Democrat that is going to run in 2020. 

[chokrai]

1 hour ago, heybruce said:

You think it takes intelligence to inherit money?

 

Analysts have taken best guesses at Trump's secretive finances and determined that his net worth has increased slightly less than it would have if he had put his inheritance into an S&P 500 index fund.  Index funds are no-brainer funds that track the market.  So as a businessman, Trump is slightly less intelligent than a no-brainer.

That is just plain silly.

[heybruce]

28 minutes ago, chokrai said:

That is just plain silly.

I assume you don't understand it.

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, Nyezhov said:

Best guess lol. Un named analysts. OK

 

Actually, not, who knows what will be in the report? ????

Ah I see. Deplorables. 

 

Ok, I'll give you a name:  Fortune magazine.  http://fortune.com/2015/08/20/donald-trump-index-funds/  Happy?

 

If Trump followed long established traditions of transparency and integrity there would be no need to estimate his wealth, he would have disclosed tax returns and holdings.

 

The imaginary crimes were attributed to Hillary Clinton and Obama.  That is clearly off-topic.

[elmrfudd]

22 hours ago, attrayant said:

 

More than a dozen have been indicted/charged/convicted/sentenced, so this was anything but a sham. Actual crimes were found and actual criminals punished.

 

 

The US already does a piss-poor job of catching white collar criminals, but you want to make sure it gets even worse?

Complete nonsense, 13 Russians indicted that will never see a courtroom, process crimes created by the phony investigation and crimes that have nothing to do with the intent of the investigation. 

 

Well done, you have just insured the re-election. 

[elmrfudd]

8 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

Can I get a nothing burger no sauce with a side of silence?

 

[Farangwithaplan]

28 minutes ago, heybruce said:

I assume you don't understand it.

Unfortunately I'm beginning to think this is the case with a branches of posters. One of my new internal warning signs for kep out a look out for people not understanding the subject at hand is when all encompassing statements like "All of the ____________" or "Everybody__________" or "they always _________". These may or may not be accompanied by slogans that hold little meaning or well known phrases have have been used as statements but unfortunately do not have relevant context.

 

 

 

 

[roobaa01]

2 hours ago, heybruce said:

Ok, I'll give you a name:  Fortune magazine.  http://fortune.com/2015/08/20/donald-trump-index-funds/  Happy?

 

If Trump followed long established traditions of transparency and integrity there would be no need to estimate his wealth, he would have disclosed tax returns and holdings.

 

The imaginary crimes were attributed to Hillary Clinton and Obama.  That is clearly off-topic.

and what crime does that constitute in reference to russian collusion ???

 

wbr

roobaa01

[xylophone]

9 hours ago, alex8912 said:

How can one person speak for all decent Americans. Wow! 

Quite agree.........trump shouldn't be allowed to spout his lies all of the time, gives you Americans a bad name!!!

[scorecard]

On 3/23/2019 at 7:29 AM, Cryingdick said:

 

Funny how quiet it has become most of the usual suspects are absent. 

Well just maybe the usual suspects (by the way I suggest your the actual poster boy for the 'usual suspects') are waiting for some further details?

[scorecard]

29 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Quite agree.........trump shouldn't be allowed to spout his lies all of the time, gives you Americans a bad name!!!

In fact I believe he should be officially sanctioned for the obvious deliberate lies which are proven clearly to be lies.

 

Also seems to me that people with his lack of ethics and morals should never get to the white house, and does it say something about US society that he did get to the white house?