Jump to content

Alzheimer's patient forced out of Thailand: Daughter tells Thaivisa they love Thailand but immigration rule changes mean mum must go


Recommended Posts

Posted

This is a sad commentary= It appears to me that they have been using the 800K but now they have to season the money for 3 months after the extension and keep 400K in the bank permanently.

 

They most likely had been paying the hospice care out of that money so it could definitely  become a financial issue as they would still need another 86,000 Baht per month for the hospice plus keeping the funds in the bank.

 

An agent in the area could most likely have sorted the whole issue.

 

The issue could have been solved by Immigration using the clause in the Immigration Act which indicates a senior official can waive requirements  when necessary.  Certainly a medical issue like this should  qualify for such an exception.

Posted

Very sad. I get that there are  rules, but all it does is highlight how impersonal and harsh they actually are. One mistake, whoever's at fault, and that's it - off you go. ????

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Crash999 said:

Why didn’t the hospital apply for a medical extension?

Some Immigration officers don't care, while others are nice in such a situation.

 

  Not every Immigration is going by the rules'laws, our Immigration officers are pretty relaxed, and they would have accepted photos of him being hospitalized.

 

     But some of them don't give a flying kangaroo. If an office wants to see a foreigner in an ambulance, as happened in the past, there must be something wrong with them. ( And their brains, too!)

 

  There'll never be something like a green card for people who work, pay taxes, and live a life contributing a lot to Thai society. 

 

   

 

  

Edited by Isaanbiker
  • Like 1
Posted

Why should the rules be changed for one family? Where does it stop? Who gets concessions to the rules?

 

If they allow one person to stay, the next lawyer will use it as historical precedent and then the person after that. Soon the law becomes so blurred it's meaningless. 

  • Like 2
Posted

The people working at immigration are only following the rules. If every single farang left and never came back they would not be bothered as they have a job and work would be easier. 

It is the ones higher up who make the rules and don’t really know why they are making the rules, they just sound good. 

One person doesn’t have health insurance and so now everyone must have health insurance!!!!

  • Like 2
Posted

OP states, "The family have put 800,000 baht in the bank and Mrs Padgett could stay to February next year. " And after that if the 800k is in the bank...?

 

Sorry, I feel for the woman with her illness but as Immigration say rules is rules. If they bend them for one the floodgates open

 

Think I'll go cap in hand to my local Immigration office, the exchange rate drop means I don't quite meet the required 65k pm.... I'm sure they'll be accommodating and bend the rule for me......

Posted
5 minutes ago, Proboscis said:

While I completely disagree with the way the Thai authorities are changing the goalposts, let us not forget how many Western countries also make it impossible for law-abiding families to stay in their countries. Australia sent home an Irish family because of a condition that the child developed; and Australia block even the most deserving cases of refugees and make them live in camps in other countries for years with little in the way of services. The UK sent home thousands of children of immigrants from the Carribean invited to work in the country after the war because they could not prove their status after the authorities had destroyed the evidence. There are so many instances of cruel decisions in immigration cases in the USA, far too many to document here, between the families where some members have the right to live in the USA, some members are being hunted by ICE and some members have unknown status.

 

So before we start throwing stones at the Thai system, perhaps we should look at our own systems first.

Perhaps starting with a green card for those who have been living here for a long time, worked for the government and spent a hell lot of money. 

Posted
6 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Tip of the iceberg. Think of all the people that will leave, are soon leaving or have already left due to the weirdly changed and unclear immigration policies that never post and never make the news.

 

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

 

 

 

 

Wel, statistics tells otherwise - there are arriving more than leaving and an increase in both short and long term visas …  :thumbsup:

  • Thanks 1
Posted

They need to apply for a medical visa through the care-giving facility.  It is only good for 90 days, but it can be renewed indefinitely by the facility.  No monthly income requirement or minimum bank deposit is required.  the 90-da y reports must still be done as well.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, donnacha said:


My sympathies on that situation, it must have been incredibly upsetting for you and your wife.

You are, however, missing what I'm saying about the couple in this particular story. I am not suggesting they plead their case with the authorities - which might be part of what they are trying to do in drumming up this publicity - because, I agree with you, in this in this situation the only solution is to deposit $25K in a bank and let it sit there until their mother dies.

Given their backstory, $25K should not be a problem.

They say that they are American. They are in their 50's. They say they ran a Web design company which was so successful that they managed to sell it - you have to attain a certain size for it to be worth anyone's while to buy your company.

Now, for some reason, they are no longer able to use their valuable tech and business skills to drum up a relatively small amount of money. Even a coder without a history of business success would be able to earn that amount of money in about a month of working hard on freelance projects. There are two of them, it should be even easier.

Neither are they able to turn to family, friends, business colleagues, people they have helped in the past, members of their church or other groups they have been involved in.

Sadly for their mother, the reality is probably that the claimed business success never happened and they long ago burned all their bridges with friends and family.

 

Did you miss the part where they are already paying 80,000+ baht per month for the mothers care?

 

I’d love to see you save an extra $25k to waste when you’re already spending $2500 in addition to your own living expenses that are at least few thousand dollars more.

 

 

Edited by dcnx
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, moe666 said:

Spot on, this is the perfect spot to get some feel goods along with the Thai bashing that goes on. They lied to the consulate about the income statement over the years and now they do not want to put the cash in the bank. Great family true christian spirit they have for old mom

How do you know they are Christians? The old woman looks Jewish. Probably at least a Crypto Jew.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, ChrissUdon said:

OP states, "The family have put 800,000 baht in the bank and Mrs Padgett could stay to February next year. " And after that if the 800k is in the bank...?

 

Sorry, I feel for the woman with her illness but as Immigration say rules is rules. If they bend them for one the floodgates open

 

Think I'll go cap in hand to my local Immigration office, the exchange rate drop means I don't quite meet the required 65k pm.... I'm sure they'll be accommodating and bend the rule for me......

Thailand is the land of bending rules. Most people are just not rich enough to get them to bend.

  • Like 2
Posted

I remember  when the Asian crash occurred when Thailand  was almost begging  for  westerners  to come to live  here of  course  bringing  their money  with them  as  the Thai baht  plunged  to very low  levels.Now in 2019 the Thai baht is  fairly  strong and  with  tourism still  among  the  strongest revenue   raiser for  the Kingdom  the powers  that be seem now to  have  decided  to introduce measures making it much more  difficult for foreigners  who havemade a decison to make Thailand their retirement home.For many years  previous Retirement visa  holders were only to provide proof of having a income from outside Thailand of THB800,000 per annumn Those on  the said visa seemed happy with that and it seemed to have run smoothly for well over  the last decade. Now  the  current change regarding the THB800,000 annual income rules  looks  and  feels like  some sort of  deliberate  attack on Retirement  visa holders to make obtaining  or retaining the visa much  more  difficult  financially and when  one looks  at  the rules to this  change  can  resemble a form of  extortion  and  bordering on being an act of racism. I am not  trying to be an alarmist but  the situation is now this. Gone is  the renewal option of proving  a person has a annual income of THB800000 or for those who could  top up  their Thai Bank accounts  to  that  amount shortly  before  renewing  retirement visas . Instead Foreigners  are now under  the  new rules  that state perons who apply  for a retirement visa must  either show that they have  been banking THB65000 per month into a Thai Bank account;or have THB800000 in a Thai Bank account 3 months before  renewal or applying for the visa  and that amount must stay the same for 2 months  after the visa  has   been approved. The rest of  the year the visa holder can only withdraw 50% of  that money which  means  ANY FOREIGNER ON RETIREMENT VISA  must keep at a minimun THB400000 in a Thai Bank account. This is  their moiney no one elses  yet they are not alllowed  to withdraw it from  a bank and use their own savings as they desire. hence  the Thai Banks  have all these accounts  with THB400000 in  their for 7 months of  the year guaranteed and THB800000  in these accounts  for  the other 5 months. Even if  Retirement visa  holders  may own condos in Thailand  outright valued  much more  than THB800000 the immmigration dept  will not  consider  that as  PART  of a persons financial  standing even though it can prove  by living in your own home  fully paid  for that a  person  does not need to raise money  ffor rental purposes.   Imagine if  the same rules  were applied to Thai nationals  living and  working overseas  say USA  that would force a Thai National to have USD25000 in a USA Bank for  7 months of the year and  the rest of the year only allowed  to access half of  what is  their own money around USD12500  The  reality is  many American people  do not have  that sort of  sAVINGS LEVELS  GOING ON IN THEIR  ACCOUNTS AS AS  MANY OTHER COUNTRIES  Im  sure  the screams of  its a form of  exortion  etc  would be heard from  the Thai  people if this was done  to them  OS.  Sorry it just seems to me  that this new ruling is  another way of  extorting money  from foreigners  and  at the same  time making the Thai  Banks look  more profitable

Posted

RE - Daughter DeAnna Denis, 57 said she personally loves Thailand and doesn't want to go to the Philippines but the family have no choice. They simply don't have enough money to deposit 800,000 baht in the bank and leave it there. 

 

Mrs Denis and her husband who is 55 originally come from Atlanta. They were attracted to Thailand as a retirement option after running a successful web development business that they sold. 

 

----

 

It seems to have been lack of planning rather than a Money problem...

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, dcnx said:

Thailand is the land of bending rules. Most people are just not rich enough to get them to bend.

Meaning a lot of us must bend over … :whistling:

Posted
6 hours ago, Jingthing said:

I think you overestimate the planning that has gone into these policy changes. Were the changes that basically punish mainly people that have been following the rules designed to actually go after "cheaters" or were they designed to drum up business to agents? I don't know, it's all speculation, but what is clear is that there are real life human consequences to any government policy change and it's hard to know which of the consequences were intended and which were not. 

Its about money, always has been always will be !

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BritTim said:

Because she is able to travel so would not have been granted any medical extension.

 

        Hope so , airlines  have rules on the mental health of passengers.

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...