Jump to content

Boris Johnson gets boost in race to become Britain's new PM


webfact

Recommended Posts

Boris Johnson gets boost in race to become Britain's new PM

By Guy Faulconbridge and Elizabeth Piper

 

2019-06-17T125527Z_1_LYNXNPEF5G0ZK_RTROPTP_4_BRITAIN-EU-LEADER-JOHNSON.JPG

Conservative Party leadership candidate Boris Johnson gestures as he talks during the launch of his campaign in London, Britain June 12, 2019. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls

 

LONDON (Reuters) - Boris Johnson got a boost in his campaign to replace British Prime Minister Theresa May on Monday when one of his former rivals and EU supporter Matt Hancock backed him saying he was almost certain to win the contest.

 

Johnson, a former London mayor and foreign minister, is way out in front in the race to become leader of the Conservative Party and despite so far deciding to steer clear of debates with his rivals, his popularity has yet to be dented.

 

Most of the other five hopefuls concede that Johnson, whose career has been marked by gaffes and scandals, will almost definitely make the final two in the race, when mainly pro-BrexitConservative Party members will cast the deciding votes.

 

But the race is on to decide who will challenge him.

 

Health Secretary Hancock, who dropped out of the race on Friday after winning 20 votes in the first ballot of Conservative lawmakers, said Johnson was the best candidate to lead the party.

 

"Boris has run a disciplined campaign and is almost certainly going to be our next prime minister," Hancock said in an article in The Times newspaper, which tapped him as a strong contender to become finance minister.

 

"My view is that we need to start coming together sooner rather than later."

 

Johnson, the face of the official campaign to leave the European Union in the 2016 referendum, has promised to lead the United Kingdom out of the EU with or without a deal. But parliament has indicated it will try to stop a no-deal Brexit, which investors warn could roil markets and shock the world economy, while the EU has said it will not renegotiate the Withdrawal Agreement that May agreed.

 

According to economists polled by Reuters, the likelihood of a no-deal exit has jumped in the past month.

 

TWO-HORSE RACE

Almost three years since Britain voted to leave the EU, the country, the parliament and both main parties are still deeply divided over Brexit. But all of the Conservative leadership contestants agree they must take Britain out of the bloc.

 

Johnson won the support of 114 of 313 Conservative Party lawmakers in the first round of the leadership contest. The second round is on Tuesday with the result due around 1700 GMT.

 

Any candidate with 32 votes or fewer is eliminated. If all candidates have more than 32 votes, the one with the fewest is eliminated.

 

For the other five, the fight was on to prove they had what it takes to challenge Johnson, or at least test some of his arguments.

 

"This is a two-horse race, and we know one of these horses - it's Boris ... There is literally only one question you have to answer, who is likely to beat Boris?" international development minister Rory Stewart said in an appeal to other lawmakers who he needs the support of.

 

"He (Boris) doesn't, as far as I can see, he doesn't have a plan. I say as far as I can see because he doesn't talk to me, he doesn't talk to you, he doesn't talk to the public," said Stewart, who is now placed second favourite.

 

Environment minister Michael Gove also took a dig at Johnson, saying his absence from Monday's hustings in Westminster was described to him as being like "Hamlet without a prince".

 

"And of course we all remember that at the end of Hamlet, he isn't the king," Gove added.

 

If Johnson does win the top job and does go for a no-deal Brexit, a constitutional crisis could be on the horizon if parliament tries to block such a departure.

 

Pro-Brexit candidate Dominic Raab has said parliament could be suspended if necessary, a possibility he refused to rule out on Sunday in a debate with other contenders.

 

But the speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, said it was fantasy to think that the lower house of parliament could be pushed aside.

"It's a joke!" Bercow told French newspaper Le Figaro in comments reported in French. "The idea that the British parliament can be pushed aside when such a crucial decision is to be made is fantasy."

 

(Writing by Guy Faulconbridge; Additional reporting by William James and Richard Lough in Paris; editing by William Schomberg and Janet Lawrence)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-06-18

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


3 hours ago, legend49 said:

Just give Boris a comb over and voila, we have book ends with the Orange haired buffoon in USA.

That "orange haired buffoon" is running circles around his communist opposition. MAGA. TRUMP 2020

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, vogie said:

So are you justifying the EUs travelling circus and wasting of money is part and parcel of the EU.

 

The “travelling circus” shuttle sees 750 MEPs and 3,000 administrative staff make the round trip to conduct business in the French city for four days a month. They are followed by lorries carrying 2,500 plastic containers of files.

The Court of Auditors report reveals calculations that taxpayers across Europe would save more than £2billion over the next 50 years if the MEPs stayed put.

There would also be a one-off windfall of £490million if the Strasbourg buildings were then sold off. The buildings are said to cost £50million a year in upkeep.

The Conservatives, who are campaigning to have the practice stopped, put the cost higher at around £130million.

Accepted. On the cost side there is a lot savings potential.

 

But how do you see the parliamentary seat ratio, organizational quality and the ability of decision-making of the UK Parliament of the last 3 years?

Everything is perfect or what?

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, vogie said:

You say things as if the EU are immune from any fallout. The majority of the British were not happy in the way which the EU was morphing, we saw and heard Verhofstadt and didn't like what we heard. Too much control was not necessary.

Are you now claiming that everyone who voted Leave did so because they 'were not happy in the way which the EU was morphing'?

 

That's a remarkable claim, where did you get the data to support it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Benroon said:

.....

 

Degrees are overrated, it merely means you study well - Diane Abbott has a first degree from Cambridge yet planned to pay the police £3 a year, then £300, then £13, then £600, if Labour got into power, not even the simplest of mathematical questions could she get right, and every interview is a car crash - so shall we leave it there ?

Diane Abbott has a 2:2 in history from Cambridge, rather like Theresa May who got a 2:2 in Geography from Oxford.

Boris managed a whole 2:1 in  ancient literature and classical philosophy from Balliol 

 

So why do we elect these second rate politicians with second rate degrees from "good" colleges in useless subjects ? We seem to be getting what you would expect from them, which is not much.

 

I dropped out of a Science degree at North East London Poly, but I could do better than them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""