Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, I would like to know if there are any Ozzies out there that have had dealings with DVA or Centre link regarding being married to a Thai lady. Recently received a "Statement of Circumstances" form from DVA. Basically asking are there any changes to my circumstances living in Thailand, eg , assets, married, de facto. My current status with DVA is single, divorced. I am now married living with my Thai lady. My Thai wife is 50 and does not work.

Has any body had any experience with this matter, as I am concerned if I fill this form out declaring my marriage I am going to have my pension reduced substantially.

I know that DVA des not recognize a non Australian resident as a spouse for payments from DVA or Centre Link, also no payment of pension on my death.

Any info would be appreciated.

Posted (edited)

get divorced very quickly or you have lost 50% and Centrelink will be looking for repayment.

 

Edited by wombat
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, giddyup said:

Not sure if DVA will reduce your pension, but I know Centrelink does.

Holland's the same. My pension will be ~€50 less if I tell them that I am married. Since I can't imagine that they'd actually bother to check or indeed have any way of checking, I'm going to fudge that particular detail when I become eligible next year.

  • Like 1
Posted

Can anyone explain to me the respective government's reason a pension would be reduced if one were married? Beyond "you don't matter as an expat and we'll do whatever we wish"

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Emdog said:

Can anyone explain to me the respective government's reason a pension would be reduced if one were married? Beyond "you don't matter as an expat and we'll do whatever we wish"

Their reason is two can live cheaper than one, because overheads such as rent are shared. Being an expat is only relevant in terms of being married to someone who is not an Australian citizen. Same treatment irrespective of whether your foreign wife is in Australia or outside it.

Posted

I receive a pension through Australian CSS (now renamed CSC...."Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation "),  BUT only paid into an Australian bank account in my name.

 

My Thai wife, as my legal spouse, IS entitled to receive 67% of this pension when I die. So long as she is co.firmed as my legal spouse.

 

 

However we MUST open an Aust bank account in her name and get her a Tax File Number. Also notarized copies of our Thai marriage  certificate, her Thai passport and ID.etc

 

Once the css governors review these she will receive her full entitlement,  albeit into her Australian bank.

 

I understand that CSC has taken over admin of military pensions as well. Ie."MilitarySuper".

Posted
4 minutes ago, orchidfan said:

I receive a pension through Australian CSS (now renamed CSC...."Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation "),  BUT only paid into an Australian bank account in my name.

 

My Thai wife, as my legal spouse, IS entitled to receive 67% of this pension when I die. So long as she is co.firmed as my legal spouse.

 

 

However we MUST open an Aust bank account in her name and get her a Tax File Number. Also notarized copies of our Thai marriage  certificate, her Thai passport and ID.etc

 

Once the css governors review these she will receive her full entitlement,  albeit into her Australian bank.

 

I understand that CSC has taken over admin of military pensions as well. Ie."MilitarySuper".

Puts you ahead of USA. My Thai wife will get nothing from my Social Security when I die. If we lived in USA for 9 yrs (I think) she could be eligible, Not worth the grief IMO of living there

  • Like 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, Emdog said:

Can anyone explain to me the respective government's reason a pension would be reduced if one were married? Beyond "you don't matter as an expat and we'll do whatever we wish"

Different rates for married and single benefits and assets, whether in Oz or not,

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I have a friend living here on a marriage visa. He has actually enquired of Centrelink re his pension on the basis of "if he were to marry a Thai or live in a defacto relationship".  The response was as long as centrelink are NOT advised of the situation they will not adjust his pension to the couple rate, viz. for him approx. AUD $200 less per fortnight, even though she is not working or earning an income of any kind. SO OP the ball is in your court as to how to act on this one.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, TigerandDog said:

I have a friend living here on a marriage visa. He has actually enquired of Centrelink re his pension on the basis of "if he were to marry a Thai or live in a defacto relationship".  The response was as long as centrelink are NOT advised of the situation they will not adjust his pension to the couple rate, viz. for him approx. AUD $200 less per fortnight, even though she is not working or earning an income of any kind. SO OP the ball is in your court as to how to act on this one.

Failure to advise Centrelink of your married status would be probably be considered as fraud. Unlikely, but if they did find out, you would probably be liable to repay all overpayments.

  • Like 1
Posted

As far as the old age pension is concerned, you will receive less if you declare your marriage.

 

As an example, let's say your single pension is $500 per week. You then get married and the married pension is $750 per week (two can live cheaper than one). However, your Thai wife, not being an Australian resident, does not qualify for an Australian pension. Nevertheless, Centrelink assumes that she is bringing some benefit to the marriage.

 

You new married pension is therefore half of $750, or $375.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Emdog said:

Can anyone explain to me the respective government's reason a pension would be reduced if one were married? Beyond "you don't matter as an expat and we'll do whatever we wish"

Nothing to do with being an expat. Oz residents are treated the same way.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/26/2019 at 9:13 PM, AlexRRR said:

From my understanding sooner or later they "who ever in AU" are informed, wasnt a smart move to get married, you surly can reply negative and of course if they catch you out eventualy they will be looking for back pay...

 

Might be in your best intrests to divorce, though there has been a lot written about this topic in the past, the guy did argue his case and eventualy his pension was restored, do you want to risk the stress and the hoops your going to need to jump through?

Never ever tell Centrelink you have a partner or that you are married. Not even a civil law partner. They will immediately deduct about $100 a fortnight from your pension or even more. Be careful too you don't slip up when asked quietly by an wilfare officer of you have a partner because as innocuos as it sounds it isn't. They'll pounce on you as quick as lightning.  An unfair aspect of this is the Social Welfare Department must consider a foreign woman can earn a wage equivalent to an Australian wife or partner or indeed if even if she may not be employed or employable.

Perhaps it is my cynicism that believes welfare front desk officers are just plain jealous of someone and some place is better off than they are.

Posted (edited)

oap rates.PNG

 

$843.60 single $635.90 each if married. If only one person is eligible then he/she gets $635.90 a reduction of $207.70.

Very tempting to risk it but if you get caught (and you will eventually) look forward to paying it all back, after you get out of prison.

Edited by emptypockets
Posted
10 minutes ago, PlastikbinLina said:

Never ever tell Centrelink you have a partner or that you are married. Not even a civil law partner. They will immediately deduct about $100 a fortnight from your pension or even more. Be careful too you don't slip up when asked quietly by an wilfare officer of you have a partner because as innocuos as it sounds it isn't. They'll pounce on you as quick as lightning.  An unfair aspect of this is the Social Welfare Department must consider a foreign woman can earn a wage equivalent to an Australian wife or partner or indeed if even if she may not be employed or employable.

Perhaps it is my cynicism that believes welfare front desk officers are just plain jealous of someone and some place is better off than they are.

Perhaps the rate should be reduced to match the cost of living wherever the retiree chooses to reside? Wouldn't that be a fair system?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GalaxyMan said:

Holland's the same. My pension will be ~€50 less if I tell them that I am married. Since I can't imagine that they'd actually bother to check or indeed have any way of checking, I'm going to fudge that particular detail when I become eligible next year.

I wonder what the logic might be to justify reducing a pension on marriage? In the UK we used to get extra tax relief on marriage, but that has now been abandoned

Posted

UK the same i get £69 a week marriage allowance which will end next April 2020 for everyone in the UK or abroad as far as i know, and no reasons given that i'm aware of!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Farang99 said:

I wonder what the logic might be to justify reducing a pension on marriage? In the UK we used to get extra tax relief on marriage, but that has now been abandoned

AS someone said previously "less expensive with two people sharing the costs", than a single person (utilities rates etc) 

 

Posted

I guess also we have more people in the world now over the age of 65 years than ever before.

Men now living longer than before, when pensions came in, it was envisaged that most would die within 10 years of retirement, now they are living about 15-20 years after retirement. 

More needing financial support for longer, so have to look at rationalising costs of pension payments

Also the tax base is dropping as people spend more time in education, work on contracts, more time between work contracts, so less taxes.

 

Posted
51 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

AS someone said previously "less expensive with two people sharing the costs", than a single person (utilities rates etc) 

 

 

Yes, I was quoted this as well. I tried under Section 25 to get my full pension as my wife makes no money, but I have more then $5,000 in an Australian bank, and I am not under a hardship clause.

 

They asked for my wifes Thai Photo ID card (they knew about her ID card), and I had to give them a copy of that. The last time I was in Australia, my wife while we were at Centrelink was asked for her National ID to put on my record as well again. I will be applying for PR for my wife, hence the reason why we married. If you plan on staying in Thailand forever, you need not to marry. There would-be  little advantage to you in this regard apart from the 400K Marriage Extension. 

  • Like 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, Farang99 said:

I wonder what the logic might be to justify reducing a pension on marriage? In the UK we used to get extra tax relief on marriage, but that has now been abandoned

It’s because I think if wife is not of retirement age she  could be expected to work.

Apart from the reason of course of trying to reduce costs and payments.

At least in the UK as seems to apply in most Western countries including the US, if you have worked most or all of your life you are entitled to receive a pension.

That is not the case in Australia where the pension is means tested and the assets level continues to be lowered excluding people who have worked and paid taxes all their life.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...