Jump to content

Ombudsman accepts for consideration PM’s oath-taking controversy


webfact

Recommended Posts

Ombudsman accepts for consideration PM’s oath-taking controversy

 

%E0%B8%9C%E0%B8%B9%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%95%E0%

(Photo) Ombudsman’s website

 

Thailand’s ombudsman has accepted for consideration a petition from Mr. Srisuwan Janya, secretary-general of the Thai Constitution Protection Association, regarding Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha’s alleged incomplete recital of an oath in the swearing-in ceremony before His Majesty the King last month.

 

The political activist wants the ombudsman to determine whether the Prime Minister violated Section 161 of the Constitution by not reciting the oath in full and then pass the matter to either the Constitutional or Administrative court if the ombudsman rules that the Prime Minister did violate the charter, said Mr. Raksagecha Chaechai, secretary-general of the Ombudsman’s Office, on Tuesday.

 

He added that he had instructed legal affairs officials of the Ombudsman’s Office to look into the facts of the matter and related legal aspects and to submit their findings to the ombudsman for consideration.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/ombudsman-accepts-for-consideration-pms-oath-taking-controversy/

 

 

thaipbs.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2019-08-07
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

The PM ,has now belatedly admitted ,that he did not read

the oath in full,so why have an investigation,to investigate him

or try to get him off the hook?.

regards Worgeordie

To investigate the circumstances,reasons and intentions of the failure to recite the oath fully and also what bearing it may have on the administering of governance and most importantly so that as many people as possible can make as much money out of the situation as possible.Lawyer's have families with higher than average financial demands!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The failure to perform the very first step of the job correct.y is a bad omen.
  • The fact that the first step is to pledge to uphold and protect the constitution is disturbing.
  • The fact that the constitution you failed to pledge to uphold is one you made up yourself and all but forced is scary.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, d2b2 said:
  • The failure to perform the very first step of the job correct.y is a bad omen.
  • The fact that the first step is to pledge to uphold and protect the constitution is disturbing.
  • The fact that the constitution you failed to pledge to uphold is one you made up yourself and all but forced is scary.

Add to that that we were told 16 million people voted for this constitution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...