Jump to content

Thaksin acquitted in 7-year-old Krungthai loan case


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Thaksin acquitted in 7-year-old Krungthai loan case

By THE NATION

 

800_23912e200c23bb7.jpg

2012 file photo

 

The Supreme Court's Criminal Division for Persons Holding Political Positions on August 30 acquitted former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra of malfeasance over allegedly influencing the approval of a huge Krungthai Bank (KTB) loan to property giant Krisda Mahanakorn. The court also withdrew the arrest warrant for the 70-year-old fugitive.

 

The Supreme Court's Criminal Division for Persons Holding Political Positions on August 30 acquitted former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra of malfeasance over allegedly influencing the approval of a huge Krung Thai Bank (KTB) loan to property giant Krisda Mahanakorn. The court also withdrew the arrest warrant for the 70-year-old fugitive.

 

 

Thaksin was indicted in 2012 under Article 157 of the Criminal Court, as well as violating four offences under as many laws governing financial institutions. 

 

As for why Thaksin was acquitted, the court cited “an unaccredited allegation” as the reason, saying two unnamed individuals had vaguely been referred to, which became a groundless allusion referring to Thaksin and his then-wife Potjaman in a case filed by the National Counter Corruption Commission and the Office of the Attorney General. 

 

The term “big bosses” was reportedly cited at a meeting of high-ranking KTB officials when it was suggested that a sum of money would be given to the “big boss” in exchange for the approval of a Bt99-billion loan to Krisda Mahanakorn, which was already not qualified for being a high-risk borrower. 

 

This case saw the indictment and prosecution of 27 individuals, including Thaksin and Viroj Nualkhair, a former KTB managing director. Viroj briefly served his 18-year prison term before being released recently due to poor health and age.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30375631

 

logo2.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2019-08-31

 

  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, robblok said:

Sure he can return, there are far more cases against them with more evidence. So if he returns he will probably end up in jail. That is why his sister when in power wanted to grant him an amnesty (nepotism anyone)  was a big reason why so many people came to protest against the government. 

 

Nothing holding him back from returning.. except facing justice.

You mean death

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well no magic can make this guy come back to Thailand, even it said come back we forgive you all ur sins, because the fear is he trust nobody and he don't want to end up in jail, I think one of the case is just been dropped, what about others

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ezzra said:

that bit above i could never understand, a special court for special people, like saying you ordinary lot need not to be tried here, this is a VIP court... Amazing...

The court has facilities to receive bigger brown envelopes. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robblok said:

Dream on Eric, nice try to rewrite history.

That’s what Suthep want people like you to believe that the amnesty meant to whitewash corruption cases. Yingluck has explicitly stated “The Amnesty Bill was designed to absolve the victims of the power seizure and not to whitewash corruption”. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

That’s what Suthep want people like you to believe that the amnesty meant to whitewash corruption cases. Yingluck has explicitly stated “The Amnesty Bill was designed to absolve the victims of the power seizure and not to whitewash corruption”. 

Ah yes, his sister said so.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Thechook said:

Well that was a wasted coup.  Anyway gave the Army something to do.

Not so sure about that is was a wasted coup, since it seems that the same person is responcible for beening late of regestring the Thai educational systen as well other things to the internatonal comunity that make the many Thai certifoxated and diplomas are not regonized and becasue of this thai people are limited in working abroad like being sailor in a meecheantship of a european nation without redoing all the exams. Things that would not have hapoend if this person and his adminsitration did do that what was needed.

There are more cases they not acted in the intrest of the people of Thailand.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...