Jump to content

PM Johnson: No impropriety in my relationship with U.S. businesswoman

snoop1130

By snoop1130
in World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

sawadee1947 Platinum Member

sawadee1947

Posted
Posted

Another lie added to all those before in his life...... who cares? 

Really? 

I think Brits are to care about by what kind of character they would like to be presented? ????

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

champers
champers

What is the world coming to when a politician can't fund dirty weekends away with some hot totty from public funds? 

klauskunkel
klauskunkel

in related news: Donald Trump has offered to send his lawyer Rudy Giuliani to assist Boris Johnson. "My friend Boris got in trouble over his Johnson and my friend Rudy has a lot of experienc

Chomper Higgot
Chomper Higgot

Just the bit about handing her a large wedge of public money to be explained.

Posted Images

evadgib Ruby Member

evadgib

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Rookiescot said:

What Johnson did was illegal. 

Also in the UK you have an unelected House of Lords and an unelected head of state.

Presumably you are ok with them passing laws so long as they are ones you agree with. 

Wot did he do & where's the evidence?

  • Like 1
evadgib Ruby Member

evadgib

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, SheungWan said:

For which ones? Breaking the law to block Parliament decision-making or taking a floozie on public expense trips or sticking his hand up a woman's skirt?

Anything that backs your persistent trolling will do.

 

Whenever you're ready...

 

BTW: I'm enjoying Mark Francois devouring Victoria Derbyshire elsewhere on live TV as I type ????

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, SheungWan said:

Government rules through Parliament. Supreme Court enforces that. Have another go.

Sent from my SM-N935F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Separation of powers. The Judiciary should not over-rule the government on political decisions. Proroguing is a political decision, not justiciable. If the prerogative power to prorogue can be changed by judges then almost anything can be.

 

You may support it now, but you know it's a dangerous precedent, and wrong. You'll pretend it's fine because the verdict went your way, this time.

 

  • Sad 1
JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, SheungWan said:

sticking his hand up a woman's skirt?

Clutching at straws now. It's sad that you've reached this level, all due to losing a democratic vote.

billd766 Star Member

billd766

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, sawadee1947 said:

Another lie added to all those before in his life...... who cares? 

Really? 

I think Brits are to care about by what kind of character they would like to be presented? ????

Take a good look at all the politicians in parliament and see how much Boris differs from them.

billd766 Star Member

billd766

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, rhyddid said:

Not improper as he got a lot of profit out of his position, this lad its a clear disaster to UK !

Good to see that you are pillorying Boris.

 

Do you actually have any proof, links whatever to prove it?

 

If you do then, please inform the UK police with a copy to TVF.

  • Popular Post
OneMoreFarang Star Member

OneMoreFarang

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Finally we have the proof that Boris is smarter than Trump. They both f$#% around and they both pay for it. But Trump uses his own money while Boris is so smart to let the tax payers pay. 

  • Like 3
OneMoreFarang Star Member

OneMoreFarang

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, sawadee1947 said:

Another lie added to all those before in his life...... who cares? 

Really? 

I think Brits are to care about by what kind of character they would like to be presented? ????

It seems many Brits want to be represented by Boris.

KneeDeep Senior Member

KneeDeep

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, JonnyF said:

I am against unelected, unaccountable judges reversing the political decisions of elected governments. 

 

Sounds right up your street though.

 

 

 

Are you against Mr Johnson lying to the Queen, as to his reasons for requesting her to prorogue Parliament?

Because that is what was under revision.

 

A political decision to lie to the Queen? 

Maybe someone is so disgusted with his behaviour that they okayed the release of information that illustrates that he is without compunction.

 

KneeDeep Senior Member

KneeDeep

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Separation of powers. The Judiciary should not over-rule the government on political decisions. Proroguing is a political decision, not justiciable. If the prerogative power to prorogue can be changed by judges then almost anything can be.

 

You may support it now, but you know it's a dangerous precedent, and wrong. You'll pretend it's fine because the verdict went your way, this time.

 

 

Wrong. The Queen prorogues Parliament on advice given to her. If the advice given is erroneous, it is only right that we have 'checks and balances'.

It was only made political, as Mr Cummins thought he could abuse the Queen by involving her in his political game.

 

 

  • Like 1
elliss Platinum Member

elliss

Posted
Posted
On 10/1/2019 at 7:33 PM, evadgib said:

Shouldn't there be an 'allegedly' in there or does his being a brexiter enable you to ride rough-shod over all that?

image.png.38bfeb3096df134f6787fded87a858f7.png

 

      Cavaliar attitude ,  fkc em all ...

 

elliss Platinum Member

elliss

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, champers said:

What is the world coming to when a politician can't fund dirty weekends away with some hot totty from public funds? 

 

         Mandy Rice Davies,  worth every penny of taxpayers money, and more ....

 

 

KneeDeep Senior Member

KneeDeep

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, elliss said:

 

      Cavaliar attitude ,  fkc em all ...

 

The irony ????

 

Boris caught with his pants down....again. 

 

As to your second comment...he certainly appears to be trying.

  • Haha 2
oldhippy Silver Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, KneeDeep said:

 

Wrong. The Queen prorogues Parliament on advice given to her. If the advice given is erroneous, it is only right that we have 'checks and balances'.

It was only made political, as Mr Cummins thought he could abuse the Queen by involving her in his political game.

 

 

Those who don't like this comment should not only leave the EU but also civilisation in general, and move to Thailand.

And don't let the door hit you on the way out. (I never thought I would quote an apologist....)

SheungWan Gold Member

SheungWan

Posted
Posted
Separation of powers. The Judiciary should not over-rule the government on political decisions. Proroguing is a political decision, not justiciable. If the prerogative power to prorogue can be changed by judges then almost anything can be.
 
You may support it now, but you know it's a dangerous precedent, and wrong. You'll pretend it's fine because the verdict went your way, this time.
 
Hard Brexiteer legal expert [emoji1782]

Sent from my SM-N935F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



ASEANNOW

ASEANNOW (formerly Thai Visa) Thailand's oldest and most popular forum for expats and foreigners.

Sign up today and have your say

MORE INFO

POPULAR AREAS

CONTACT US

219/59 Asoke Towers, 15th Floor, Soi Sukhumvit 21, Watthana, Bangkok 10110
(+66) 99 196 1100
[email protected]

×
×
  • Create New...