-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
115
The Art of Saudi Dementia
Trump EFFECT--WINNING (now do biden and impress us all -
83
How to tell if you're dealing with a MAGA folk?
Putting lots of spaces does not add credibility. The child was removed from the USA. The US government has already acknowledged the event and does not deny the child's removal. You are ignoring the known fact that the child who was a U.S. citizen suffering from a rare form of metastatic cancer was forcibly removed without medication or the ability to consult with their treating physicians–despite ICE being notified in advance of the child’s urgent medical needs. What part of the child protection laws do you not understand that places the safety of the child primary to the alleged claim that the child belonged with the parents? Whether or not the child will return to the USA is irrelevant. The child was removed without its required medication and its immediate safety was put at risk. The child will most likely die without medical care. The child was sent to a country that will not be able to provide the healthcare that the child was receiving. The removed families had no choice in the matter. The manner of removal demonstrates that ICE arranged the removal process with the intent to deny access to legal assistance and to deny the US citizen children to have access to due process. The court filings state that ICE detained the first family on Tuesday, April 22, and the second family on Thursday, April 24. In both cases, ICE held the families incommunicado, refusing or failing to respond to multiple attempts by attorneys and family members to contact them. In one instance, a mother was granted less than one minute on the phone before the call was abruptly terminated when her spouse tried to provide legal counsel’s phone number. The families were completely isolated during critical moments when decisions were being made about the welfare of their minor children. This included decisions with serious implications for the health, safety, and legal rights of the children involved–without any opportunity to coordinate with caretakers or consult with legal representatives. The actions were in direct violation of ICE’s own written and informal directives, which mandate coordination for the care of minor children with willing caretakers–regardless of immigration status–when deportations/removals are being carried out. You say that it sounds like the parents took the children without notifying the doctor. Wrong. The mother tried to have the medical authority contacted and ICE refused. It is nice that you acknowledge that US citizens should not be forcibly removed from the USA. However, that is what occurred here. There was no effort to act in the child's best interest. Even in draconian states like Texas, a court will appoint a person to represent a minor when there is a serious proceeding. The appointee is there to ensure that the child's rights are respected. This did not occur. You know what it looks like? You are attempting to cover up and make excuses for a catastrophic blunder by the local ICE office. Even the most extreme right wing of SCOTUS judges are going to have a hard time supporting what was an unconstitutional and illegal act. Sending a sick US citizen to suffer and probably die in a foreign land is not going to play well with most people. -
-
115
-
115
-
75
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
.thumb.jpeg.d2d19a66404642fd9ff62d6262fd153e.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now