Jump to content

Thousands of people trapped in Australian coastal town by huge wildfires


Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Soooooo, either they are saying that the undergrowth I saw burning on a tv news clip wasn't actually there, or they are saying undergrowth had no factor in the fires. Hmmmmmmm.

No, the fires are of an unprecedented magnitude. I think you are a kiwi so I’d expect you’d know the geography of Australia somewhat. They have their targets but they can’t get everywhere due to basic geography. Add in shorter burning off windows (shorter winters). 
 

Houses and buildings surrounded with well manicured farms with fields and pastures are being destroyed. Embers flying 40km creating new fronts.

 

https://www.facebook.com/107787018440/posts/10156883674788441?sfns=mo

Posted
1 minute ago, samran said:

No, the fires are of an unprecedented magnitude. I think you are a kiwi so I’d expect you’d know the geography of Australia somewhat. They have their targets but they can’t get everywhere due to basic geography. Add in shorter burning off windows (shorter winters). 
 

Houses and buildings surrounded with well manicured farms with fields and pastures are being destroyed. Embers flying 40km creating new fronts.

 

https://www.facebook.com/107787018440/posts/10156883674788441?sfns=mo

Not to mention that some of the "fire reduction burns" have escaped containments due to unexpected high winds. Couple that with a year of further drought, higher temperatures, and dryer fuel load, lightening strikes, 

Because of the danger some areas due for reduction burns have not been able to be burned, less staff on the ground in National Parks and fire crews.

Fires where I have come back to began in September and continue even though the danger which was there is much less.

We had a tree, which had not smoked or smouldered for 3 days, ignite from under the roots, spread unexpected, to already burned surface area.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, samran said:

No, the fires are of an unprecedented magnitude. I think you are a kiwi so I’d expect you’d know the geography of Australia somewhat. They have their targets but they can’t get everywhere due to basic geography. Add in shorter burning off windows (shorter winters). 
 

Houses and buildings surrounded with well manicured farms with fields and pastures are being destroyed. Embers flying 40km creating new fronts.

 

https://www.facebook.com/107787018440/posts/10156883674788441?sfns=mo

I do, but I only have experience of Sydney and the outback around Broken Hill. Never been in the forested area.

However, should similar drought and temperatures happen in NZ, the North Island is going to burn, because every pine forest I've passed by on the road has undergrowth. It hasn't been necessary to clear it in the past, though we do have fire breaks. I do hope that in the halls of forest owners and government they are considering what to do in the event of similar weather as Australia has now.

Far as I know, we only have helicopter buckets, and no planes for dropping water.

Posted
4 hours ago, samran said:

No, the fires are of an unprecedented magnitude. I think you are a kiwi so I’d expect you’d know the geography of Australia somewhat. They have their targets but they can’t get everywhere due to basic geography. Add in shorter burning off windows (shorter winters). 
 

Houses and buildings surrounded with well manicured farms with fields and pastures are being destroyed. Embers flying 40km creating new fronts.

 

https://www.facebook.com/107787018440/posts/10156883674788441?sfns=mo

No..not a Kiwi..

Posted
9 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I do, but I only have experience of Sydney and the outback around Broken Hill. Never been in the forested area.

However, should similar drought and temperatures happen in NZ, the North Island is going to burn, because every pine forest I've passed by on the road has undergrowth. It hasn't been necessary to clear it in the past, though we do have fire breaks. I do hope that in the halls of forest owners and government they are considering what to do in the event of similar weather as Australia has now.

Far as I know, we only have helicopter buckets, and no planes for dropping water.

So what's the range of the FDDI on the North Island?

Posted

If you want to see where a lot of the lies about how Greens are responsible for the fires, or that this fire season is no worse than others, or that arsonists are largely to bloom, look no further than Rupert Murdoch.

How Rupert Murdoch Is Influencing Australia’s Bushfire Debate

 

The idea that “greenies” or environmentalists would oppose measures to prevent fires from ravaging homes and lives is simply false. But the comment reflects a narrative that’s been promoted for months by conservative Australian media outlets, especially the influential newspapers and television stations owned by Rupert Murdoch.

...His standard-bearing national newspaper, The Australian, has also repeatedly argued that this year’s fires are no worse than those of the past — not true, scientists say, noting that 12 million acres have burned so far, with 2019 alone scorching more of New South Wales than the previous 15 years combined.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/08/world/australia/fires-murdoch-disinformation.html

  • Like 2
Posted

Yes-it is an exceedingly false narrative which started on day 1 of the fires.Perhaps one should mention the radio station's "talk-back jocks" as well as this form of media is still very popular in Australia and it's influence is often under-rated.

Posted
On 1/5/2020 at 7:25 PM, Olmate said:

But you know so much about Australian bush fires and tree huggergreens. I grew up in that area as a young fella ,I know the grazing of the high country was an issue then. It was the precursor to the current thinking of locking up the national parks and generally using political pressure to prevent controlled back burns and other measures in the name of conservation? Really if you know nothing about that area what,s the point of replying.

Just because I don't come from down south don't mean I don't know anything of the area.

 

Before I moved to the Gold Coast in the 90's I lived in Canberra.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Odysseus123 said:

Yes-it is an exceedingly false narrative which started on day 1 of the fires.Perhaps one should mention the radio station's "talk-back jocks" as well as this form of media is still very popular in Australia and it's influence is often under-rated.

I wonder how many posters on the subject of “back-burning” have read the links to the expert articles on it, and comprehended what has been written and said on the subject.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Odysseus123 said:

No..not a Kiwi..

As he was replying to my post I assume you are referring to me, so perhaps you can explain your very strange claim.

I don't go on facebook so I have no idea what the link is about.

Posted
2 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

I wonder how many posters on the subject of “back-burning” have read the links to the expert articles on it, and comprehended what has been written and said on the subject.

When you are running a narrative such as this you keep it simple and re-enforce it repeatedly-Dr Goebbels knew the trick...

 

If challenged you merely shift from one topic to another-an endless "whataboutism"

 

In terms of the Murdoch press it fitted seamlessly into the already existing campaign that they have been running for years-climate change denial,"anti-Greens" and,most recently,virulently anti Greta Thunberg.

 

We all knew in my area that the fires were coming due to the three year intense drought,the very short winter season,the hot and high winds and the fact-experienced by all-that there was no rain-and there still hasn't been any.

 

So this was going to go up like a bomb..

 

DSCN0123.JPG

Posted

Arson, mischief and recklessness: 87 per cent of fires are man-made

 

https://www.smh.com.au/national/arson-mischief-and-recklessness-87-per-cent-of-fires-are-man-made-20191117-p53bcl.html

 

The main thrust of Australians now must be to ignore the climate cultists, and catch all these firebugs. How many of them turn out to be members of the climate cult trying to prove the fallacy that man made climate change caused the fires(that they themselves set!) would be interesting to know. I suspect the majority were.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Arson, mischief and recklessness: 87 per cent of fires are man-made

 

https://www.smh.com.au/national/arson-mischief-and-recklessness-87-per-cent-of-fires-are-man-made-20191117-p53bcl.html

 

The main thrust of Australians now must be to ignore the climate cultists, and catch all these firebugs. How many of them turn out to be members of the climate cult trying to prove the fallacy that man made climate change caused the fires(that they themselves set!) would be interesting to know. I suspect the majority were.

Ah..yet another emissary of looney,right wing Tralfamadore.

 

They are penetrating our air space thick and fast these days...

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
58 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

The point about Scott Morrison is that he is entirely a creation of the Murdoch press and would love to dance to their tune.

 

Hence the climate change denial but the increasing confusion between ideology and the actuality on the ground.

 

As long as Rupert and his Tralfamadorean crew pull the strings ScoMo will remain in a state of confusion.

 

Considering that a substantial portion of his party consist of looney right wing Tralfamadoreans who believe that the Earth is but 6,000 years old you can see that he will have a problem when independant decision making is called for.

 

Meanwhile the greatest danger to all looney right wing Tralfamadoreans is the miscreants from the planet Greenie who may inhibit free access to the airspace.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, RJRS1301 said:

I read your second link and THIS seemed to hit the spot.

South-eastern Australia has long experience of intense fires, yet our population has spread into the bushlands of coastal hinterlands and urban fringes. This has occurred despite scientists warning for more than 30 years that wildfire risks were intensifying due to climate change.

 

So long as people continue to ignore reality, such events will happen. Fire in bushland is NORMAL. People trying to stop bush fires is not the best strategy, IMO, when they should be working WITH nature, not against it.

 

PS. The actions suggested seem to be overly dependent on volunteers, so I can't see that working. Perhaps 30 years ago when people were more community minded. Asking VOLUNTEER fire fighters to do even more is a bit cheeky, IMO.

They need to come up with a better strategy than asking communities to do the work for nothing.

Posted

The fires are a natural occurrence however now to the extremes, I believe this along with floods, earthquakes, cyclones & tornado's, drought and landslides, and the ice age are what killed off the mammoths, dinosaurs and made others extinct. The world moves in cycles and times change, as well as weather patterns. Hot one century and cold the next or whatever, but this is what is happening.  imo  

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Odysseus123 said:

The point about Scott Morrison is that he is entirely a creation of the Murdoch press and would love to dance to their tune.

 

Hence the climate change denial but the increasing confusion between ideology and the actuality on the ground.

 

As long as Rupert and his Tralfamadorean crew pull the strings ScoMo will remain in a state of confusion.

 

Considering that a substantial portion of his party consist of looney right wing Tralfamadoreans who believe that the Earth is but 6,000 years old you can see that he will have a problem when independant decision making is called for.

 

Meanwhile the greatest danger to all looney right wing Tralfamadoreans is the miscreants from the planet Greenie who may inhibit free access to the airspace.

 

 

Their creation,s latest stuff up, on Kangaroo Island...oops sorry I forgot the two residents who died!ED5F724E-2D65-44E8-90A2-19CF02F61068.thumb.jpeg.c9f6a7d1e66b5cb03b130f52c4115267.jpeg

Posted
44 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

 

And what's truly alarming about these fires is that they began in October. January and February used to be the fire season. Thank you climate change.

What difference does it make that the fires used to be in Jan Feb?  Do you honestly believe that the earth's climate has been constant for a million years?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, giddyup said:

What difference does it make that the fires used to be in Jan Feb?  Do you honestly believe that the earth's climate has been constant for a million years?

Fires still are in Jan and Feb, It's just that now they're also in October, November, and December. What denialists don't seem to understand is that it's not a question of climate change, it's about the increased rate of change and what's causing it.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, bristolboy said:

Fires still are in Jan and Feb, It's just that now they're also in October, November, and December. What denialists don't seem to understand is that it's not a question of climate change, it's about the increased rate of change and what's causing it.

Can you categorically say that similar changes haven't happened before in Earth's history.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

And what's truly alarming about these fires is that they began in October. January and February used to be the fire season. Thank you climate change.

Wrong. The fire are arson as per my post 257 above. I will copy paste for your benefit and to stop the propagation of fake news. The Aussie fires have as much relation to man made climate change as the Smollett lynching had to do with the MAGA movement.

 

Arson, mischief and recklessness: 87 per cent of fires are man-made

 

https://www.smh.com.au/national/arson-mischief-and-recklessness-87-per-cent-of-fires-are-man-made-20191117-p53bcl.html

 

The main thrust of Australians now must be to ignore the climate cultists, and catch all these firebugs. How many of them turn out to be members of the climate cult trying to prove the fallacy that man made climate change caused the fires(that they themselves set!) would be interesting to know. I suspect the majority were.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 4
Posted
21 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

And even Paul Read, the person whom you cite, says this:

"We do not have an 'arson emergency,'" he says. "They might light the fires, but the consequences are due to climate change first, fuel load second."

https://sea.mashable.com/science/8478/the-arson-emergency-trending-amid-australias-bushfire-crisis-is-actually-not-a-thing

If the trees and leaves weren't there, nobody would burn them, right? 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

If the trees and leaves weren't there, nobody would burn them, right? 

It’s very dry and very hot. And these conditions are unprecedented. Arson not the major cause of these fires.
 

But it seems whatever alt-right web board you get your info from is giving you these lines, so predictably (surprise surprise) you come here to repeat them...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...