Jump to content

Trump takes hard line on U.S. monuments, threatens force against protesters


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

Calling/framing what these people are doing as 'protesting' is so far devoid of any logic that it would be almost amusing if the repercussions weren't so severe. 

 

The actions of these black-clad rioters is the polar opposite of 'protesting' and even the VERY FIRST AMENDMENT describes it:

 

 

These people have been toppling statues for weeks now and its high time they stopped. 

I'm sorry, how is knocking down statues not peaceful? Is violence against inanimate objects a thing in your world?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

Dumbest post of the day, and thats saying something coming out of this Forum. 

So you can't figure out a way to twist vandalism into violence. Didn't think so.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Mama Noodle said:

You just can't go and destroy stuff that isnt yours, any way you cut it. 

But you can. In fact, much better to burn(destroy) something that doesn't belong to you. Even bystanders think go ahead and burn it, it don't belong to me. 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

Calling/framing what these people are doing as 'protesting' is so far devoid of any logic that it would be almost amusing if the repercussions weren't so severe. 

 

The actions of these black-clad rioters is the polar opposite of 'protesting' and even the VERY FIRST AMENDMENT describes it:

 

 

These people have been toppling statues for weeks now and its high time they stopped. 

Why, is it high time they stopped? Because you said so? Far too many very peaceful protesters are demanding that the bigotry of the U.S., and in fact all around the civilized world, cease! and for a very first in America are standing up and saying so. Too da*n bad you don't like it, cuz it's a whole lot bigger than you are.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

     Can't stand Trump but I am with him on protecting national monuments from destruction.  You can protest and make your point without destroying property, both personal and public.  

  • Like 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, car720 said:

No it is not.  As usual it is the vocal minority that have got no respect for others whatsoever.

Wow, you actually consider this worldwide upheaval to be unsubstantial enough to identify as a ... minority?  Really?

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, vogie said:

Does anyone else think these people should be locked up, even if it's just for their own safety?

Winston Churchill once famously said that the best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter*. Perhaps his status should be made from indestructible stainless steel.

 

* 'They say' he said that.

 

 

Edited by rabas
Posted
On 6/24/2020 at 7:16 AM, steven100 said:

bring in the military and start using rubber bullets & tear gas,  start locking the protesters up.

nothing more than thug vandals who need to be arrested.

And nothing less than that is the only solution. The military should have been activated on day one. And if not enough space in local jails then military bases. This is becoming a civil war and high time overwhelming force is necessary. 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 4
Posted

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right."

  • Like 2
Posted
13 hours ago, Dap said:

Wow, you actually consider this worldwide upheaval to be unsubstantial enough to identify as a ... minority?  Really?

 

Upheaval? If and when something actually changes, perhaps. Remains to be seen. Worldwide? Sorta, not in every country, not in the same force, not even with same agenda always. And hyperbole aside, it is not a worldwide majority or even a US one. Most people do not partake, most people aren't fully signed to all that's related to the protests, the vandalism and violence in particular.

  • Like 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, morrobay said:

And nothing less than that is the only solution. The military should have been activated on day one. And if not enough space in local jails then military bases. This is becoming a civil war and high time overwhelming force is necessary. 

 

If this is becoming a civil war (hyperbole, but let's entertain the notion) then bringing in the Army might have some consequences - such as soldiers siding with protests, for example. Further, armed forces aren't really well equipped or well trained to deal with this. More likely someone will go overboard and just make things worse. Don't recall USA generals being much in favor of the Army's involvement, but what do they know, eh?

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, aj73 said:

Fascinating to read such nonsense. You clearly don't know how the US legal system works, and you sure as hell don't have a clue when you state, "majority of Americans".. 

 

Then again I don't read ThaiVisa for the news anyway... It's not like there's such a thing as journalistic integrity in the world anyone.. 

 

If you think ANTIFA and BLM are anything other than paid Marxist organizations then you should get your head examined... 

 

It's not about racism, it's about control.

 

So where do you get your news from?

Doubt you could provide any serious support for the ANTIFA/BLM comment.

 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...