Jump to content

Trump says coronavirus under control as U.S. death toll rises


webfact

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, keith101 said:

The US is only 18th in the world for testing per population which is how it is actually calculated , so he was wrong about that as he is about everything related to the Corona Virus and deaths mean nothing to a Psychopath like Donald . 

He obviously meant per million population. However on that measure I understand the UK and Russia test more than the US. It has to be said though the US test more than any other nation on earth except the UK and Russia, per million figures.

 

 

Tests by c.jpg

Edited by Logosone
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Phoenix Rising said:

If they ever build a tiny presidential library for the trump "presidency" that quote should be above the door; "It is what it is".

 

And over the Medicine and Health section (610 in the Dewey Library Classification system)......."Just Flu"

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

You can see 'small rises' in a lot of countries but with the US there has been nothing but rises. It hasn't gone down in 6 months and it is still in it's 1st wave.

Well, cases in the US may have started to fall now, we'll have to see:

US progression.png

  • Confused 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Yes, it is truly amazing believing trump cold get a handle on covid getting under control, in three months. Or that unemployment could possible get better in that same three months. 

I understand that's what the dems are banking on,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://reaction.life/we-may-already-have-herd-immunity-an-interview-with-professor-sunetra-gupta/

 

Also a link to another source with more from Guptera and others such as nobel laureate and Stanford professor Dr. Michael Levitt who has based on classic epidemiology modelling and prediction created by William Farr put  August 25th as the date COVID19 will be essentially done with. He has been correct in his predictions about China and Sweden to his credit: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/lockdown-lunacy-3-0-its-over/?itm_term=home

 

(Irony/Sarcasm alert for the first sentence) Interview with conspiracy theorist,  frothing at the mouth ranting raving  menace  to society, Dr.  Sunetra Gupta, who probably used to date Alex Jones, and as a distant secondarily important side note is a professor of epidemiology at Oxford with much in depth and complex nuance to report on herd immunity which is what, along with our own immunity, protects us from being infected by the hundreds of trillions of viruses are present in each every human body and in practically infinite numbers all around us. There is also much in this interview  regarding her contention that to report death totals among vast swaths of populations such as entire nations as large as the UK, and certainly the US and other large countries,  is an incorrect and inaccurate way to get a picture of what is happening with the "virus". To quote Gupta from the article "COVID 3.0- Its Over," "When you think of the US as a whole, you’re missing the fact that the epidemic appears to be over in the north east and growing in the south west. Why would you put them together? There’s no reason to lump a rise in cases in Arizona with everything else." In the article linked above, Guptera elaborates more on this and in a nutshell she says that what is happening with people's immunity and their seroprevalence levels (anything that shows up in a blood test indicating exposure to a virus or whatever is being looked for) is very different from city to country and between different areas of countries, especially as large and diverse geographically and population-wise as the U.S. So to take what I infer is Guptera's perspective, I would assume that the OP is presenting yet another skewed msm/WHO/UN/Big Pharma perspective by using US death rates as a whole to support yet another alarmist position. In another article others present what epidemiology has long known regarding  how flu virus develop more slowly in warmer areas. A video that encapsulates that position based on the work of epidemiologist R. Edgar Hope Simpson:

 

 

And from the interview linked above:

 

Maggie: The expression “herd immunity” has entered the same realms as austerity and Brexit. It has become a sort of danger word because of that whole debate at the very beginning. The minute you say herd immunity, the popular newspapers say you want to kill all the old.

 

Dr. Guptera: It’s just a technical term. It’s just a technical term for the proportion of the population that needs to be immune in order to prevent the disease from spreading, which is the central concept in vaccinations. It’s a fundamental epidemiological concept, which clearly has been subverted. I guess the fact it includes the word herd has made it easier. The truth is that herd immunity is a way of preventing vulnerable people from dying. It is achieved at the expense of some people dying, and we can stop that by preventing the vulnerable class in the process. In an ideal situation, you would protect the vulnerable as best you can, let people go about their business, allow herd immunity to build up, make sure the economy doesn’t crash, make sure the arts are preserved, and make sure qualities of kindness and tolerance remain in place. We live, it seems, in this state of terror. Yes, international travel facilitates the entrance of contagion, but what it also does is it brings immunity."

 

 

 

Edited by Shaunduhpostman
addding a link
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...