Jump to content

Black man shot in back by police in Wisconsin city, governor says, curfew imposed


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, simple1 said:

Apparently the shooter is a 17 year old member of a white militia, now been charged with murder.

 

Source for him being a member of a "White Militia" needed, because your link just says "Militia" and that he was there to help anyone who needed it and to protect businesses. 

 

He was also attacked with molotov cocktails, a skateboard, threatened with a pistol and by every available metric was unequivocally defending himself. 

 

My opinion is that there is no way on planet earth that hes gonna be convicted of murder, and arresting him for it is laughable. 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

Source for him being a member of a "White Militia" needed, because your link just says "Militia" and that he was there to help anyone who needed it and to protect businesses. 

 

He was also attacked with molotov cocktails, a skateboard, threatened with a pistol and by every available metric was unequivocally defending himself. 

 

My opinion is that there is no way on planet earth that hes gonna be convicted of murder, and arresting him for it is laughable. 

can't be bothered to play your games. The white militia group had requested local law enforcement to be deputised, which was refused as they didn't support vigilantism - bottom line, they were acting unlawfully.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, simple1 said:

So what, doesn't justify shooting the guy in the back seven times. Let's see if charges are laid for attempted murder or whatever the prosecutors find appropriate to prove 'beyond reasonable doubt'.

 

"Blake admitted he had a knife in his possession" 

 

"DCI Agents recovered a knife from the drivers side floorboard of Mr Blakes vehicle" 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, simple1 said:

can't be bothered to play your games. The white militia group had requested local law enforcement to be deputised, which was refused as they didn't support vigilantism - bottom line, they were acting unlawfully.

 

Evidence that he was a member of a "white" militia group please. 

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Pilotman said:

That was inevitable and more will follow. 

A WHITE SUPREMACIST (17 yeras old) killed 2 protesters and injured 2 more ( as far as I know now!).

Come on, usual suspects: you cry over looted property, when it comes to "protesters"- where is your outrage now?

Posted
1 minute ago, The Barmbeker said:

A WHITE SUPREMACIST

 

He was not a white supremacist. 

 

1 minute ago, The Barmbeker said:

killed 2 protesters and injured 2 more

 

Killed 2 people who were attacking him, bashing him in the head with a skateboard, and another who was aiming a pistol at him, and shot another who threw a molotov cocktail at him. 

 

I really wish people would stop fibbing about this guy. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

I'm familiar with Kenosha.  What a fvckin' shame.  Nice old town.  Should have sent in the national guard the moment the guy got shot to protect innocent people's livelihoods.  Not hard to predict what's going to happen.  I could imagine some people forced out of work due to Covid, then finally get back to work only to lose it once again because of these "social justice warriors."  This is not the method to bring about change.

 

 


 

How about NOT SHOOTING UNARMED PEOPLE IN THE BACK?

That might have helped the community!

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, The Barmbeker said:

How about NOT SHOOTING UNARMED PEOPLE IN THE BACK?

That might have helped the community!

 

Blake admitted he had a knife, and the cops recovered a knife from the drivers side floorboard of his car. 

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

There is a very, very good reason Tucker Carlson has the number one rated cable news show in the USA at the moment. 

 

 

 

Mind boggling how Democrats think they'll win this election these insane policies.  Good luck, LOL.

 

MAGA - Trump landslide 2020

  • Thanks 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Mama Noodle said:

And after what, this is the third? Fourth city to be set alight and people murdered during riots? 

 

Democrat governers STILL allow their cities to burn and businesses to be destroyed and people to be assaulted and killed out of nothing but pure political optics, and the mainstream media STILL refuses to cover it in the context and capacity if what's actually happening on the ground with mostly independent and citizen journalists being the only ones with the balls to actually catch all this chaos on video. 

 

Democratic Governor Tony Evers Rejected Hundreds Of National Guard Troops Police Needed Before Shootings: White House

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/democratic-governor-tony-evers-rejected-hundreds-of-national-guard-troops-police-needed-before-shootings-white-house

Daily Wire! 

I would also love to know, what Infowars has to say!

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

He was not a white supremacist. 

No, he was just a run of the mill base trump supporter. And they're not white supremacists, are they? No, Sir!!

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/kenosha-shooting-suspect-idolized-police-224100613.html

 

"Kenosha shooting suspect 'idolized' police, sat in the front row of Trump rally"

Edited by Phoenix Rising
  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, bodga said:

because  handguns are so accurate and  legs  dont  contain major arteries that will bleed you to death very quickly...........huh

He was literally an arm lenght away!

I am not an expert, but I would say, if a trained police officer can not hit a leg at arms length, he should not be allowed to carry any weapon except for a super- soaker and a Nerf bat!

  • Haha 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Phoenix Rising said:

No, he was just a run of the mill base trump supporter. And they're not white supremacists, are they? No, Sir!!

This is you calling Trump supporters white supremacists? 

Posted
7 minutes ago, The Barmbeker said:

How about NOT SHOOTING UNARMED PEOPLE IN THE BACK?

That might have helped the community!

Sending in massive amounts of National Guard shortly after the Blake shooting would have helped the community.  The Democrat Governor and the Democrat mayor sat on their hands.  Even then they trickled in National Guard in an insufficient amount.  Governor Evars stated in part, "to provide support to local law enforcement and to protect critical infrastructure and cultural institutions necessary for the well-being of the community, and to provide support to first responders such as the Kenosha Fire Department. The Wisconsin National Guard may not be used to impede the ability of people to peacefully protest or impede the ability of the media to report on this situation."

 

No mention of protecting businesses or innocent people.  Apparently that doesn't fall under the category of "the well-being of the community."

 

As I had posted earlier:

 

Democrat Mayor John Antaramian stated to reporters Monday afternoon, "Rioting and looting is not something that is acceptable in this community, and therefore that also has consequences."  So what ensues?  Two nights of rioting, looting and arson.  He moved his presser into a public safety building which was attacked by rioters and a door was snapped off its hinges before police in riot gear pepper-sprayed them.

 

"Regrettably, in attempting to hopefully calm people down, I was not overly successful," Antaramian said.

 

What a bimbo.  You're going to attempt to reason with rioters?  What a fool.

Posted
1 hour ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

Source for him being a member of a "White Militia" needed, because your link just says "Militia" and that he was there to help anyone who needed it and to protect businesses. 

 

He was also attacked with molotov cocktails, a skateboard, threatened with a pistol and by every available metric was unequivocally defending himself. 

 

My opinion is that there is no way on planet earth that hes gonna be convicted of murder, and arresting him for it is laughable. 

He is WHITE and he was part of a MILITIA and he shot BLACK protetsres!

I don't know how dense you are, but let's find out!

Was he 

a) member of a white militia

b) President of the Malcom X- brigade

c) member of the socialist marxist Bernie Sanders w ing of ANTIFA?

Have a guess!

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, The Barmbeker said:

He is WHITE and he was part of a MILITIA and he shot BLACK protetsres!

 

All the victims I saw were not black. 

 

1 minute ago, The Barmbeker said:

I don't know how dense you are, but let's find out!

Irony. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

"Blake admitted he had a knife in his possession" 

 

"DCI Agents recovered a knife from the drivers side floorboard of Mr Blakes vehicle" 

 

 

 

...and beacuse all cops are mindreaders, they of course knew exactly that, when they gunned him down from close range, in the back and didn't try to confine him otherwise with the power of THREE police- officers!

Rrrrrright!

Posted
23 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

He was not a white supremacist. 

 

 

Killed 2 people who were attacking him, bashing him in the head with a skateboard, and another who was aiming a pistol at him, and shot another who threw a molotov cocktail at him. 

 

I really wish people would stop fibbing about this guy. 

WRONG!

He killed one person and was on the run after the crime!

 

Posted
Just now, The Barmbeker said:

...and beacuse all cops are mindreaders, they of course knew exactly that, when they gunned him down from close range, in the back and didn't try to confine him otherwise with the power of THREE police- officers!

Rrrrrright!

 

Blake, himself, with his own mouth, using his own words, said that he had a knife. Cops recovered a knife from the very place that he was reaching for in his car. 

 

He also fought with police on the ground, a female officer tried to tase him, and he managed to get away and take off to his car, open the door, and reach in to the very place where a knife was recovered. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, The Barmbeker said:

He killed one person and was on the run after the crime!

 

That person threw a molotov cocktail at him while others were throwing projectiles.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Phoenix Rising said:

<snip>

 

"Kenosha shooting suspect 'idolized' police, sat in the front row of Trump rally"

Is it criminal to idolize police (someone's characterization which may or may not be accurate) or attend a Trump rally?  Would attending a Biden rally effect the same negative reaction for you?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

Blake, himself, with his own mouth, using his own words, said that he had a knife. Cops recovered a knife from the very place that he was reaching for in his car. 

 

He also fought with police on the ground, a female officer tried to tase him, and he managed to get away and take off to his car, open the door, and reach in to the very place where a knife was recovered. 

I have a knife too!

Guess, I have to be careful from now on!

Your racist bias is showing!

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 8/25/2020 at 8:38 AM, Mama Noodle said:

 

See, I dont see any color in this situation. You, and everyone else, seem to want this to be about his skin color, and not his actions, that contributed to his death. Its the same old, boring, stale argument everyone makes.  

Wow. You remind me of this guy. 

image.gif.1850a5552cf77b1974134b864de4dff2.gif

image.gif

Posted
2 minutes ago, The Barmbeker said:

I have a knife too!

Guess, I have to be careful from now on!

Your racist bias is showing!

"Your racist bias is showing!"

 

You're losing it . . . badly.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Mama Noodle said:

 

Blake admitted he had a knife, and the cops recovered a knife from the drivers side floorboard of his car. 

So far as we know police did not know he had a knife in the car prior to being shot seven times in the back. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, The Barmbeker said:

I have a knife too!

Guess, I have to be careful from now on!

Your racist bias is showing!

 

If you've got a knife, and you tell a bunch of cops who are reporting to a domestic call that you have a knife while those very same cops are trying to arrest you for an outstanding warrant that consists of sexual assault with domestic abuse modifiers, and you refuse to obey, resist arrest, get tased, and bee-line for your car....

 

Yeah you should be careful. 

 

Dunno what any of that has to do with race or racism, but situation normal on here. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Pilotman said:

I like and agree with your sentiments here. It seems that the US white, middle class communities are too narrow minded and intransigent to make real change happen, unless by violent reaction to murders like this one by the black communities.  It has been going on for generations and real change can only come about now through violent reaction by the discriminated communities.  The US has brought this on itself.  I said at the beginning of this thread, that there is a sickness, a deadly virus, in the US, and its not Covid. 

I don't know if your familiar with my countries law of the land?

Only through peaceful assembly are we to protest! What your suggesting , violence to achieve a goal is akin to mob rule! imop Sad!

 

 The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress"

 https://www.learningtogive.org/resources/right-assemble#:~:text=The First Amendment to the,the government for a redress

Edited by riclag
  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, BritManToo said:

If you don't use violence nothing changes.

The more widespread and extreme the violence, the quicker the change.

Our whole civilisation is based on violence/threat of violence.

 

If the black people of America want change, they should attack corporate holdings.

Burn everything owned by companies listed on the stock market.

Hit the shareholders, their dividends, their pensions and things would soon change.

Don't attack your neighbourhood mom and pop stores, that just harms yourselves.

Violence does not always lead to change.

 

We have had many hundreds of years of race riots in the USA. Back in 1863 there were race riots in the US. 

 

The real question should not be if violence is needed for change. The first question should be is change necessary, and if so change to what?

 

Whilst racism is a reality, in fact the income of blacks has gone up over the last decades. Many administrations have put in place laws to ensure black people can access mortgages. There are in fact more white people killed by police than blacks. 

 

The only justifiable change would be to have police officers act perfectly in every situation, which given the split second and dangerous situations they are in, or believe they are in, is not a realistic goal. Mistakes will happen. Again and again. No matter what guidelines and training. It just happened in the UK too with police. It happened in France.

 

What other change is desirable or justifiable?

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...