33 minutes ago, Tounge Thaied said:

Where and when I grew up, if a mob came at my family home this way, they would get one warning shot over their heads. If they didn't leave, the shots were no longer warning shots. Amd is exactly why it never happened. No mob would have gathered like that because they knew. 

This incident (in St. Louis) with the couple happen a few weeks after Officer Dorn was murdered during the riots and assaults in St. Louis!

 

Scared and helpless

 

Edited August 25, 20205 yr by riclag

they successfully chased off the trespassing mob from their property, that is all

Edited August 25, 20205 yr by scammed

7 minutes ago, mokwit said:

For the benefit of Brits on this board I will translate: 'More and more people is the US are tooled up'.

any translation for us that arent familiar with white ghetto slang ?

5 minutes ago, keith101 said:

Since when does Fox BS News tell the truth , you really have got a problem if you believe what you you see and hear on that network .

Couldn't agree more. but if you think you are getting the truth from CNN, MSNBC etc you are just as misinformed, only from the other side.

Factually incorrect post and posts discussing moderation have been removed.

2 hours ago, riclag said:

The way the law is structured in Missouri, a citizen has the right to protect themselves and  property and if they feel  threaten, they can exercise lethal force! 

There is a big difference between the right to protect and pointing loaded guns at harmless people.

These pictures should explain it. Spot the difference:

 

Aggressive, guns pointed at people.

 

Protection, not provocation, guns pointed to the ground.

 

Numerous off topic, trolling posts and comments on moderation have been removed, from both sides of the perspective.

Contrary to the opinion of some, the moderation team remove untrue and trolling comments from the left as well as the right.

If you want to support your argument with a notoriously biased site, that by omission misses out key facts which are reported elsewhere, you should not be surprised when it is removed.

Further such comments will be removed without notice and warnings issued.

10) Do not comment on moderation publicly in the open forum; this includes individual actions, and specific or general policies and issues. This also includes posting an emoticon in response to a public notice made by a moderator. 

 

You may send a PM to a moderator to discuss individual actions or email support (at) thaivisa.com to discuss moderation policy.

 

 

2) You will not use ThaiVisa.com to post any material which is knowingly or can be reasonably construed as false, inaccurate, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of any law.

5 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

There is a big difference between the right to protect and pointing loaded guns at harmless people.

These pictures should explain it. Spot the difference:

 

Aggressive, guns pointed at people.

 

Protection, not provocation, guns pointed to the ground.

 

Out of curiosity is the photo of female officers anti-terrorism police in the UK?

Self deleted

Edited August 25, 20205 yr by simple1

Epic fail. Hot shell casings eject on the right, injuring both.

 

And does the Mrs. have mustard on her shirt? I think her gun is a lighter.

 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, webfact said:

Couple who pointed guns at protesters tell Republican convention that suburbs in peril

Couple who defended their home from trespassing mob tell Republican convention about suburban crime rise

 

Fixed the Reuter's headline.

Edited August 25, 20205 yr by Pattaya Spotter

6 minutes ago, riclag said:

Sorry buddy ! I'll conform to your thinking when Missouri changes their laws. Until then I suggest you read the laws of that state.  The AG of Missouri said he intends to follow the law and dismiss the case once its concluded. He says it political! IMOP They have witness the chaos that many people have watched on TV.

Schmitt cited Missouri’s Castle Doctrine, which he said provides “broad rights to Missourians to protect and defend their personal safety and property against those who wish to do them harm.”

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/missouri-a-g-to-seek-dismissal-of-charges-against-couple-who-pointed-guns-at-protesters/

if the pair are found guilty on the felony gun charges, doesn't the AG's stance amount to political interference?

1 hour ago, riclag said:

So your dismissing the  law in  Missouri as irrelevant lol! 

The AG in Missouri makes reference to the law you dismiss in this news story!

 

“Enough is enough,” the attorney general said in a video message posted just hours after the charges were filed. “A political prosecution such as this one would have a chilling effect on Missourians exercising the right to self defense.”

 

   “a large group of subjects forcefully break an iron gate marked with ‘No Trespassing’ and ‘Private Street’ signs,” St. Louis police said.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/missouri-a-g-to-seek-dismissal-of-charges-against-couple-who-pointed-guns-at-protesters/

 

 

 

In that case a do dismiss the law in Missouri. ???? 
 

I find it very hard to stand side by side with people that makes up laws that allow socially handicapped persons to use the laws to harass people walking in the streets just because they are to scared and anxious to hack it in a culturally diversified society where every person have the right to express their opinion.

Edited August 25, 20205 yr by Matzzon

40 minutes ago, Orton Rd said:

why nobody was shot and they had a legal right to own guns and tell the trespassers to f off, heroes, not villains

Tell it to the court

44 minutes ago, riclag said:

This incident (in St. Louis) with the couple happen a few weeks after Officer Dorn was murdered during the riots and assaults in St. Louis!

 

Scared and helpless

 

Snowflakes who scare REALLY easy apparently.

35 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

There is a big difference between the right to protect and pointing loaded guns at harmless people.

These pictures should explain it. Spot the difference:

 

Aggressive, guns pointed at people.

 

Protection, not provocation, guns pointed to the ground.

 

no, that is a downright dumb comparison,

in the first pic, you had a couple with a mob trespassing on their property,

and in the second pic, you had two police woman posing for a pic

43 minutes ago, Tounge Thaied said:

Just to name a few... 

Didn't see any "destroyed suburbs" in your screed...

41 minutes ago, Tounge Thaied said:

Let's see...
1965 MLK civil rights riots... Kennedy/Johnson (Democrats)

1965 Watts, California Riots... Lyndon Johnson (Democrat)

1967 Detroit, Michigan riots... Lyndon Johnson (Democrat)
1992 Rodney King riots... Bill Clinton (Democrat) 

Obama's and Biden's Tenure... (Democrats)>SNIP"

deleted the long list of incidents. The member posted the comment below in response to claims by republicans....

 

The suburbs have never been destroyed under democratic rule before. 

 

Can you identify where 'suburbs' have actually been destroyed during riots?

1 hour ago, transam said:

Oh......????

I can remember what took place in London in 1984, I bought a 1976 Trans Am basket case......????

Now why is Bluespunk confused about my post...?

Come on now BS, what's confusing...????

Never mind the ‘random gun nuts’ did you see Donald Trump Jnr’s performance?

 

Putting aside his histrionic ranting, he didn’t look at all well.

 

 

47 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

There is a big difference between the right to protect and pointing loaded guns at harmless people.

These pictures should explain it. Spot the difference:

 

Aggressive, guns pointed at people.

 

Protection, not provocation, guns pointed to the ground.

 

Yes, they are carrying guns just incase they get confronted by an angry violent mob .

If they get attacked, they would raise their guns .

33 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

Epic fail. Hot shell casings eject on the right, injuring both.

 

And does the Mrs. have mustard on her shirt? I think her gun is a lighter.

 

 

 

 

Are hotdogs with mustard a problem now...?

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Never mind the ‘random gun nuts’ did you see Donald Trump Jnr’s performance?

 

Putting aside his histrionic ranting, he didn’t look at all well.

 

 

Trump comments are tiresome, his family even more.................

i note that the couple must have had both training and had control over them self,

they do not have the finger on the trigger.

the woman still seem under educated tho, she would be faster to a proper shot

if she held the handgun with both hands pointing downward,

it takes a longer time moving her left hand to a firm grip over the pistol then moving both hands up

4 hours ago, webfact said:

"No matter where you live, your family will not be safe in the radical Democrats' America," Patricia McCloskey said.

Well, if you feel compelled to stand outside your house aiming guns at people it says something about Trump's America, doesn't it?

Good part of this story is they they don't know how to handle guns, so maybe they'll suffer at their own hands.

 

Problem with American life is people like these.

 

 

2 minutes ago, bendejo said:

Well, if you feel compelled to stand outside your house aiming guns at people it says something about Trump's America, doesn't it?

Good part of this story is they they don't know how to handle guns, so maybe they'll suffer at their own hands.

 

Problem with American life is people like these.

 

 

So its Trumps fault the Constitution says about the right to bear arms...?

How do you know they don't know how to use their weapons..?

1 minute ago, transam said:

So its Trumps fault the Constitution says about the right to bear arms...?

How do you know they don't know how to use their weapons..?

Look at the way they're holding them.

 

55 minutes ago, simple1 said:

Out of curiosity is the photo of female officers anti-terrorism police in the UK?

I don’t think so....the weapons they are holding are not British. Maybe Sweden or another European country.

13 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

Yes, they are carrying guns just incase they get confronted by an angry violent mob .

If they get attacked, they would raise their guns .

 

 

Look like UK anti-terrorism police on patrol. So far as I know in the UK Police with lethal weapons do not confront protestors.

1 hour ago, Orton Rd said:

why nobody was shot and they had a legal right to own guns and tell the trespassers to f off, heroes, not villains

Sir, can you please point out the trespassers, and where they went in on another persons grounds?